Search results

  1. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT The plaintiff argues that the defense is seriously twisting the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to support their argument. The submitted chat logs do not mention the room in any shape or form. The argument that the...
  2. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    Your honor, I would like to ask for a 48 hour extension. I was busy with my exams and I haven't been able to work on my closing statement. EDIT: closing instead of opening statement obviously.
  3. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    Your honor, I would like to ask for a 48 hour extension. I was busy with my exams and I havent been able to work on my closing statement.
  4. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The possibility that the door may or may not have been left open is completely irrelevant. There were extremely clear signs(P-07) saying that access is only for employees, and therefore even entering violates the trespassing...
  5. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    Your Honor since witness Marissa4 has trouble finding information of this fact, and in the interest of time, the defense would like to submit exhibits D-043 (the photo) and D-044(the link) from the November government budget transcript. This report was released on the 8th of December and thus...
  6. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO END DISCOVERY EARLY The plaintiff moves that discovery be ended early, since we have nothing to submit and want to move this case along.
  7. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    For question 15, you should have gotten a dm from the "Server" bot. If that is not possible the unfine can be requested from DHS I believe.
  8. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    for @Marissa4: 15. How much were you compensated by the DHS/DOJ/other government institution for each killed animal? How much was this in total? 16. Did this cover the costs you incurred? Did it cover more than these costs? 17. Since killing animals is such an unpleasant part of your job, why...
  9. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    For @asexualdinosaur: 1. Do you verify that these coreprotect logs are truthful and real? 2. Did Marissa4 use or rename a nametag anywhere on the property?
  10. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Sirbucket420 [2024] FCR 127

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT The defence moves for summary judgement as agreed with the prosecution.
  11. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Sirbucket420 [2024] FCR 127

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The defendant is a bit of an idiot. He sold WMDs to the attorney general, without even thinking about it. Even the attorney general couldn’t believe it. However the defendant is someone with a clean record and without any...
  12. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    Could you recheck your answers because I asked 14 questions, and I got 13 answers. Additionally some of the answers are pretty weird when paired with the question.
  13. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT The defendant has gotten more than enough time to even give an indication of life. The plaintiff therefore moves for summary judgement based on the known facts of the case.
  14. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - SPECULATION Based on the submitted evidence of this case, the witness cannot know if the defendant killed the animals “for fun”. The witness even admits to not knowing the reason behind the animal kills. The defense would like to...
  15. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    Did you ever name the killed animals? If yes, did you write these names down anywhere? Did you tell them to someone? How does this “special bond” allow you to kill the animals for their products? Do you feel any remorse or distress for killing at least 218 animals in about a month? Did you ever...
  16. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    Seeing the circumstances and as a show of good faith, the plaintiff will agree. After the deadline we would like to automatically motion for summary judgement.
  17. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Sirbucket420 [2024] FCR 127

    The defense does not agree to summary judgement.
  18. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The plaintiff has already exceeded the 72 hour mark. Even a 24 or even a 48 hour extension that was granted where a reason is given, would have passed already. Now the court has ultimately given the plaintiff a total of 4...
  19. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, it has been more than 72 hours since the plaintiff could start asking questions to their witness. This far exceeds the 24 hours allowed under Court Rule 6.6. The defense therefore requests the...
  20. Omegabiebel

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION dimitre977 Plaintiff v. .BlazingFoxKit Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On the 28th of November at 23:00 EST, the Defendant broke into the employee-only room on 6th floor of C601...
Back
Top