IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95
I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. The Defendant offered multiple people money to vote for them in the house of representative election.
2. Therefore he has committed electoral fraud...
The Defendant has 48 hours to state that they agree or disagree. Furthermore if they disagree, they must post their closing statement within this time period.
The prosecution has failed to meet the deadline. I hereby charge neemfy with one count of contempt of court, and order the DOJ to fine/jail him appropriately.
The Defendant now has 48 hours to post their closing statement.
Objection: Perjury
I never denied the warrant, and there is a return warrant showing that the warrant was never denied. In their opening statement, the prosecution stated twice that I denied the warrant when it is clear that I didn't.
OPENING STATEMENT:
1. This was a warrant on Xeu100, not Tello Bank, If judges were expected to recuse themselves from warrants that involved anyone they have ever done business with, or a business connection with, there would be no judges to approve of any warrant. This is because as a citizen...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Kukkinekko v. FTGWop [2022] FCR 96
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant committed fraud by presenting himself as a medical specialist despite not being one.
2. He demanded the Plaintiff pay him the $13 that he got from treating a...
If the supreme court will only accept a plea deal if one of the punishments is removal from office, I will not be accepting the plea deal, and I will be pleading not guilty.
I will be denying this objection as the Prosecution was the initial party that brought up bribery in their filing when they were defining electoral fraud.
We will now move onto witnesses. Both parties have 48 hours to list all of their witnesses, or state that they have none.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Drippzy_Tox v. ToasterwithADHD [2022] DCR 56
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant called the Plaintiff a bad lawyer multiple times which is a purposefully false statement which is slander.
2. This slanderous statement hurt the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Jdroppert [2022] DCR 58
I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff filled out an eviction report despite not working for the DCT, and by doing so posed as a DCT worker.
2. If the DCT didn't notice this...
Because FTGWop considered that his closing statement and not a motion to dismiss, you are not able to post a rebuttal. This also means that I will not rule on whether to dismiss the case or not, but rather post a verdict within a couple days.
I have made a mistake. The public defender utilization act has been repealed, and therefore it is no longer a requirement to have a public defender represent the Defendant instead of a default judgement. Because of this I will be writing a verdict soon.
Due to the new law that there must be a public defender, as well as the new law that changes the public defender program, there are no public defenders at the moment, and therefore this case will be in recess until the Defendant gets a public defender, or appears in court to defend themselves...
Due to the fact that I will be in school when the time is up, and I can't ensure that the prosecution will reply in time, I will provide my plea now, however I am still in negotiations with the prosecution.
I am currently pleading not guilty for the one count of corruption.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.