Search results

I will be denying the injunction for a restraining order, and summons will be filed soon, but could you please provide proof of doing /as info region while standing next to a villager.

Could you provide proof that the villagers are on your property, and where you have a right to a restraining order.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT The Galactic Empire of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 27 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The DCT, specifically DrThunder7 has reported multiple buildings of the GER and its members to be eyesores. 2. These reports are...

Thank you to the Defense for their closing statement, a verdict will be posted within the coming days.

Thank you to the Plaintiff for their closing statement. The Defendant now has 48 hours to post their closing statement.

Thank you to the witnesses for answering their questions. The Defendant has failed to post their questions for FTGWop or failed to state that they have no questions for that witness. For that reason, I hereby charge RelaxedGV with 1 count of contempt of court, and order the DOJ to fine/jail...

DrThunder7 has 48 hours to answer the Plaintiff’s questions, and the Defendant now has 48 hours to post all questions they have for FTGWop or state that they have none.

In the next 48 hours, the Plaintiff must post their cross examination questions for DrThunder7 as well as any questions they have for FTGWop. If they have no questions for either party they must say so within the 48 hours. The Defense may also ask a question to FTGWop either within these 48...

Both of the witnesses have 48 hours to answer their questions.

I will be denying the motion to reconsider. An objection on the grounds of calling for a conclusion are when a witness is asked for their opinion that is not of importance. For example, question 1 was stricken because the opinion was whether or not the building was an eyesore. It’s not important...

I will be accepting the objection for question number 4, and it has been stricken from the record. I will be denying the first objection to strike question 2 as opinion questions are allowed to be asked. The Defendant now has 48 hours to post all of their questions for any of the Plaintiff’s...

I will be accepting this objection for the first question only as the first question isn’t relevant to the case as a building being an eyesore isn’t an opinion but rather if it meets the criteria set by the DOT. TheReal42Person, you have 48 hours from now to answer all but the first question.

I hereby charge Nexalin and FTGWop with 1 count of contempt of court each and order the DOJ to punish them appropriately. The Plaintiff has 48 hours to post all of their questions for all of the witnesses except for DrThunder7. I would also like to inform both parties that LAKottke has not...

All witnesses have 48 hours from now to state that they are present if they have not done so already.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @LAKottke is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of The Galactic Empire of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 27 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at...

ZLost, as 3 weeks is too long to wait, you can either choose to not call xEndeavour as a witness, or you may choose to call a different witness to replace xEndeavour. You have 48 hours from now to make your decision.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS Nexalin, xEndeavour, FTGWop, TheReal42Person, and DrThunder7 are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of The Galactic Empire of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 27 as witnesses. Please...

I will be partly accepting the motion. I will still be allowing Nexalin, xEndeavour, and FTGWop to testify as well as 1 person from the category that zLost called “Everybody else” in his response to the motion. As there is no reason to have close to 10 witnesses all being called for the same...

You may respond to the objection. You have 24 hours to do so.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Dartanman v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 33 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. On January 31st, the Super Modern Legal Board Act was proposed and sent to congress. 2. Both the House and the Senate voted on and approved this bill. 3...