Search results

  1. F

    War with the 1008er

    Ooooo now we're scared if the great erragon joins u
  2. F

    War with the 1008er

    I have proof of your members confessing to that. You're lying.
  3. F

    War with the 1008er

    I havent seen anyone join ur movement tbh
  4. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    I hereby respond to the summon. I plead not guilty, and would like to refer to what I have written above, and again apologize for having talked out of turn. Please still consider the points made above, Thank you your honor. Freeze28
  5. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    your client told me to go die, im not the toxic one here
  6. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    actually, royalsnake, no one has the right to safety in the wild. pvp is fully legal in the wild, as is everything else, because, and I'm repeating myself: Laws. dont. apply. in. the. Wild.
  7. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    I dont see how my past as a mafiaboss should somehow impact this trial. being in the Mafia is not illegal + I'm retired from it
  8. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    Oh and also, my name is not Freeze83. fix your lawsuit
  9. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    Judge, there are no laws in the Wild. Redmont gov does not reach into wild. I admit to killing the villager completely, but I also know it was legal, since it was in the wild. trespassing also does not exist in the wild, I dont understand what proof is needed here other than that is was in the...
  10. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    Oh trust me it'll be very speedy, cuz this has 0 legal basis.
  11. F

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre077 V Freeze29 [2023] FCR 35

    hey there, I do not need a lawyer for this laughable lawsuit, I'll represent myself Dear Judge, not so dear opposition: pls tell me what does it say once you enter the wild? thats right, it says "No laws apply in the Wild". That alone should be enough to close this joke of a case. I was...
  12. F

    Bill: Rejected Federal Security Office Act

    didnt we nay this idea 2 times yet?
  13. F

    Vetoed Congressional Subpoena Clarification Act

    you changed something in subsection c) but didnt mark it as a change
  14. F

    Bill: Rejected DEC Grants Are Cool Act

    why'd you aye it then?
  15. F

    Bill: Rejected Blackmail Act

    ahh I get it now. Why have a law that is a rule already tho?
  16. F

    Bill: Rejected Blackmail Act

    Bans are only applicable for rules, not for laws if I'm not mistaken, therefore this bill isnt even possible. Thats if I'm correct about bans only being applicable for rules and not for laws, I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure that I'm not. So this Bill cant be a Bill basically.
  17. F

    Bill: Rejected Information of the Public-Act

    dont you think this could maybe be a first step towards better speakers?
  18. F

    Vetoed The Broke B Act

    I see, and I didnt know that, so thanks for telling me!
  19. F

    Vetoed The Broke B Act

    I totally get that and agree, I should have clarified and bettered the bill before just posting it after Taro sent it to me, but I do have one question: If the speaker already had concern about color coding, why did he not get in contact with me in the draft stage?
Back
Top