I hereby respond to the summon. I plead not guilty, and would like to refer to what I have written above, and again apologize for having talked out of turn. Please still consider the points made above,
Thank you your honor.
Freeze28
actually, royalsnake, no one has the right to safety in the wild. pvp is fully legal in the wild, as is everything else, because, and I'm repeating myself: Laws. dont. apply. in. the. Wild.
Judge, there are no laws in the Wild. Redmont gov does not reach into wild. I admit to killing the villager completely, but I also know it was legal, since it was in the wild. trespassing also does not exist in the wild, I dont understand what proof is needed here other than that is was in the...
hey there, I do not need a lawyer for this laughable lawsuit, I'll represent myself
Dear Judge, not so dear opposition: pls tell me what does it say once you enter the wild? thats right, it says "No laws apply in the Wild". That alone should be enough to close this joke of a case.
I was...
Bans are only applicable for rules, not for laws if I'm not mistaken, therefore this bill isnt even possible. Thats if I'm correct about bans only being applicable for rules and not for laws, I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure that I'm not. So this Bill cant be a Bill basically.
I totally get that and agree, I should have clarified and bettered the bill before just posting it after Taro sent it to me, but I do have one question: If the speaker already had concern about color coding, why did he not get in contact with me in the draft stage?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.