Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Vernicia (Dragon Law representing) Plaintiff vs. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains as follows: At 11:07 PM EST on March 2, 2024, the DoC Secretary posted private information about sales...

Additionally, the Plaintiff would like to attach these items to prove that the DoC investigation started on January 9th, the day that the Plaintiff gambled at MGM’s casino. Exhibit N shows the end of the investigation — not the beginning. Exhibit O Exhibit P Exhibit Q

The Plaintiff will call Mask3D_WOLF as a witness.

Question for razorsharpbread: 1. Why did you deny v__d employment at your bank?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, This court case before you is about government overreach. There are two main points here. 1. According to the (now repealed) Financial Institutions Tax Act: “The DOC is able to seize Financial Institution and Director/Owner...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Ducky_Doge (Dragon Law representing) Plaintiff vs. MGM (owned by coptop and operated by Lex404) Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Plaintiff went into the Defendant’s casino...

Your Honor, can we move this along?

The Plaintiff will call razorsharpread as a witness. Additionally, we would like to submit this screenshot into evidence as Exhibit F.

The extension of 7 days as opposed to 48 hours is acceptable to the Plaintiff.

Your Honor, I would like to request an additional 48 hours of Discovery on top of the original 7 day deadline.

It has been nearly a week and there has still been no summons. Can we get this show on the road?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION v__d (Dragon Law representing) Plaintiff vs. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains as follows: The DoC has seized the Plaintiff’s assets under the Financial Institutions Tax Act. The process...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, As opposing counsel stated: “If i recall, we are innocent until proven guilty in this land, and since guilt was not proven let’s look at the facts.” Even though he has confused this case for a criminal one, I agree. He has not...

Objection, your Honor. This is Breach of Procedure. As per Rule 4.9 (Witness Protocol), a witness list must be submitted during Discovery. We are past Discovery and are past Opening Statements. Additionally, opposing counsel decided to end Discovery early thus willingly revoking his right to...

Your Honor, when I pasted my opening statement into the forum post, it changed all of the numbers in the numbered points to “1.” May I edit my post to fix that problem?

Response to Objection Your Honor, the definition of “Assumes facts not in evidence” as per the objections guide is: “the question assumes something as true for which no evidence has been shown.” What question? I am not asking any question to a witness. I am making a statement in opening...

Response to Objection Your Honor… what? It is written into the contract that BubblyBo has the explicit right to take the “shares” back at any time. Additionally, I need to clarify that the contract does not state “shares of stock.” And it simply states “shares.” The fact that these “shares”...

Response to Objection I stated that my client signed an employment contract with Constellation Co. to become an employee of Constellation Realty Co. I am stating that my client did not sign that employment contract. Meaning the employment contract shown in evidence, as it has been edited. This...

Response to Objection Your Honor, the definition of “Speculation” as per the objections guide is: “When a witness is asked to testify about something they have not directly observed. Witnesses are only allowed to testify about their own direct experiences and thoughts.” This does not apply to...