Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, This document is illegal or null and void in numerous ways. First, this document is not what my client signed. The contract has been edited, as seen in the first attachment in the Complaint. The Plaintiff has edited it after my...

Your Honor, just to clarify, it was not the response to the subpoena. It was the answer to the interrogatory question.

The Defense would like to end Discovery early, your Honor.

MOTION TO STRIKE Your Honor, everything opposing counsel posted after the first sentence is immaterial as it has no essential or important relationship to the claims for relief. Additionally, it is impertinent as it consists of statements that do not pertain, and are not necessary, to answer...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBPOENA BubblyBo Plaintiff vs. MysticPhunky Defendant DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED 2. Plot sale history for BubblyBo, the owner of Constellation Realty Co. and BaroqueGem65762, employee of Constellation Realty Co., between the dates of...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBPOENA BubblyBo Plaintiff vs. MysticPhunky Defendant DOCUMENT TO BE PRODUCED 1. The full edit record of the employment contract signed on the 23rd of December 2023. The Defense maintains the right to subpoena more documents and/or...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT INTERROGATORY BubblyBo Plaintiff vs. MysticPhunky Defendant QUESTIONS FOR THE PLAINTIFF 1. Has Constellation Realty Co. sold one (1) plot of real estate since the 24th of December, 2023? The Defense maintains the right to ask up to four...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the in response to: “Nowhere within the contract does it state either that you must continue working even if you wish to resign and instead the contract within this case states that if you wish to resign before working...

OBJECTION BREACH OF PROCEDURE Opposing counsel was not prompted to respond. Unlike objections, motions do not allow the opposing party to respond without being asked to by the presiding judge.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH MOTION TO DISMISS 1. Per Rule 5.9 (Collateral Estoppel), this case should not be heard as it has already been ruled in The Lovely Law Firm v. babysoga [2023] FCR 87, any clause in a contract that… “stifles economic mobility and, essentially, requires...

Your Honor, the Defense would like to end Discovery early.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the Plaintiff has hired an attorney to represent him. The Plaintiff does not need an extension due to their real life issues when they have legal counsel to appear in court on their behalf.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH Addendum to Motion to Dismiss The Defense would like to request the Court to award the Defendant with the cost of legal fees in the amount of $5,000.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH MOTION TO DISMISS 1. Per Rule 5.12 (Lack of Personal Jurisdiction) of Court Rules and Procedures, the Plaintiff has not proven that they have been at all harmed by the Defendant and thus have no standing to file a case against the Defendant. 2. Per Rule...

We do, your Honor. It was posted before the answer.

Response to Objection Your Honor, this is getting silly. I have already previously posted the grounds for a response without prompt by the presiding judge. Opposing counsel obviously has not read that response. Opposing counsel is simply wasting the court’s time. In addition to that, we have...

Response to Objection The screenshot I posted was of the Plaintiff’s own attachment in the first objection. No new evidence or information has been added with my attachment. Your Honor, it was attached for your convenience as to show which screenshot I was referring to so you did not waste time...

Objections Guide

Response to Objection These screenshots that the Plaintiff has attached still do not show that, “The Defendant bought properties of r-066, r-099, and r-075 with company funds to sell for the company,” as claimed by the Plaintiff in paragraph 2 of Facts in the original filing. There is still...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT BubblyBo Plaintiff vs. MysticPhunky Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT The Defendant does not dispute this claim. The Defendant disputes this claim. The Defendant does not dispute this claim. The Defendant disputes this claim. II. DEFENSES...