Search results

I'm dropping the suit as I'm leaving the server 🙂

The condition for responding to an objection allow opposing counsel to respond without asking for 24 hours, I believe in this situation as the objection is directed at me it would apply. I can assure the court that this amicus brief is simply additional material to the previously made amicus...

I request to file an amicus brief to the court regarding this latest Motion, in relation to my previous amicus brief.

I can confirm to the court the DLA has complied with the order and as such with the requested information I will be filling opening statements shortly, however it is new years!

I would like to inform the court I can no longer in good conscious represent @xEndeavour.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Onyx Industries (Prodigium: Dusty_3 & Donut Law Firm: The_Donuticus Representing) Plaintiff v. Tello Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Your Honor, When you make an agreement you need...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION *sigh* Your honor the Defendant claims I committed perjury for stating they have lied in court, so it appears accusing someone of perjury is now in itself perjury according to the Defence - a truly dazzling legal mind. Perjury is stating something that is knowingly...

OBJECTION Firstly breach of procedure. Secondly as explained this Freedom of Information request is in response to unprivileged statements made by the Defence that must be disproven for a fair trial to be undertaken, chiefly the claim that a vote happen to assert Tylxr as Mayor. The Defence is...

Apologies your honor, life has been extremely busy and the DLA has still not granted my freedom of information request for information vital to this case, having made the request 9 days ago. This Freedom of Information request is vital to answer the unprivileged claims of the defence that a vote...

The Plaintiff would request a 48 hour extension as we are waiting on a Freedom of Information request made on the 21st.

OBJECTION As explained in our original response there exists a distinction between members of the town council and seats on the town council. The legal process which allows for mayoral appointments is for seats. I ask the court to stop this chicanery on the part of the Defendant.

A BILL To Introduce More State Commendations The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short...

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Due to the fact that Tylxrfied is now not Mayor (And hopefully soon not to be Deputy Mayor), they cannot appoint any individuals to the role of Deputy Mayor as doing so would invalidate their own position. Thus I would ask the court to roll back the appointment of ItsMeVoid...

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION As there are no legal provisions or reason which would grant Tylxrfied the role of Deputy Mayor, I ask the court that they grant the Prayer for Relief to have them removed from the role immediately. They have shown that they will abuse the role for their own personal gain...

MOTION TO AMEND FILING Following on from closer inspection, as explained above, there is no process by which a Deputy Mayor can be appointed in the Consitution of Klondike. Tylxrfied became Deputy Mayor at the appointment of SnoWhitebeard on the 18th of Nov 2022, this is not possible under the...

OBJECTION: PERJURY In their Motion to Dismiss the Defence writes: I believe this sequence of event to be factually incorrect. I believe that this did not in fact happen, there was no vote and that Tylxr just stepped back up to the role as they had previously stated. If the Defence cannot...

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS 1. The Defendant is factually incorrect when claiming the Plaintiff is factually incorrect that there is not a process for the appointment of a new mayor. The Defendant has chosen to raise an irrelevant section of the constitution to try and confuse the court, now...

May the Plaintiff please have a chance to respond to this?

NAY - Redundant Language, this is already covered by the Proceeds of Crime Act.

House Vote: 7-0-0 Senate Vote: 4-0-0 A BILL To Establish Offences under the Standardized Criminal Code The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do...