Search results

  1. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Matthew100x & xLayzur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 20

    Thank you for recognizing this, I would ask for a 6 hour extension on the deadline to respond to the case given that the case up until this point has been so chaotic and I am busy this evening until 2 hours before the deadline.
  2. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Matthew100x & xLayzur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 20

    Furthermore I must object to this your honor, the Plaintiff has not been given the opportunity to respond to the initial complaint even though we are still within the original 48 hour window. Because of all this circusry they have only been able to make a motion to reconsider the decision for...
  3. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Matthew100x & xLayzur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 20

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Attorney General would strongly urge the court to reconsider its position in its belief that the Attorney General has committed perjury, a disbarrable offense. This case, which is a simple open and shut one, has turned into a...
  4. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Matthew100x & xLayzur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 20

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Defense move that the Court reconsider its position, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. By carrying out this Referendum the Speaker of the House is fulfilling his constitutional duties. If he were to halt it he...
  5. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Matthew100x & xLayzur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 20

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL The Defense moves that the Court compel the Speaker of the House to allow the Attorney General to do his job as prescribed in the Constitution via the Department of Legal Affairs which ‘is charged with legally defending...
  6. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77

    Your Honor, For maybe the first time in Redmont's history, I'm actually going to have to cross the aisle on this one. As the new Attorney General (As of for four hours ago) I apologize for the tardiness of the DLA in this case, however it seems that nobody in the DLA seemed it appropriate to...
  7. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77

    Your honor, The Plaintiff would like to call xEndeavour as the author of the ‘Property Fairness Act’, the ‘Property Definitions Foundation Act’, & the 'Reveille Taxation Act'.
  8. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Unfairly Taxed Citizens Class Action Lawsuit Group (DouCo Law & Partners Representing) Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant As the points made in the Motion to Dismiss have been made in this court the...
  9. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The_Donuticus v. Dartanman [2022] FCR 74

    Your honor, Myself and the Defendant have reached an agreement on this matter outside of court and wish to end this suit amicably.
  10. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77

    I apologize your honor, I had thought I requested an extention as life has been a bit horrible the last few days - I am happy to elaborate on these details and provide evidence if requested. I hope the court can understand this.
  11. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77

    Your Honor, Some glitch seems to have occurred and posted this to the Supreme Court when it was definitely opened as a thread in the Federal. Please may it be moved.
  12. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Unfairly Taxed Citizens Class Action Lawsuit Group (DouCo Law & Partners Representing) Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Your Honor, We have...
  13. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The_Donuticus v. Dartanman [2022] FCR 74

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION The Plaintiff would like to take this opportunity to reiterate the criteria for what constitutes slander. 1) The statement must be false. 2) There must be intent to do harm. 3) There must be harm. So lets evaluate the statement...
  14. Lord_Donuticus

    Appeal: Denied FCR 67 - Perjury Charges - Appeal Request

    As the suit in question has ended the Plaintiff would like to request this suit continues.
  15. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The_Donuticus v. Dartanman [2022] FCR 74

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS The_Donuticus Plaintiff v. Dartanman Defendant I. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS 1. The Court Rules and Procedures outlines a Frivolous Court Case as: There is no other definition provided for a Frivolous Court...
  16. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The_Donuticus v. Dartanman [2022] FCR 74

    In the absence of a timeframe for this response being given the Plaintiff would like to request a timeframe of 48 hours from this point, in order to not cause confusion down the line. The reason for requesting such a long time is that the Plaintiff has real life work commitments over the next...
  17. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Admin23 v. The Exchange [2022] SCR 17

    Apologies your honor, When writing the Defense opening statement I must have clicked post reply by mistake.
  18. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Admin23 v. The Exchange [2022] SCR 17

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Admin23 Plaintiff v. The Exchange (Represented by DouCo Law Partners) Defendant Your honor, this case is nothing more than an individual who was incapable of using a service correctly, lashing out due to the fact that they were incapable of...
  19. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The_Donuticus v. Dartanman [2022] FCR 74

    Your Honor, the Plaintiff would like the opportunity to respond to this motion on grounds of objections, points of law and precedence.
  20. Lord_Donuticus

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The_Donuticus v. Dartanman [2022] FCR 74

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION The_Donuticus Plaintiff v. Dartanman Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Your honor, The RBA election is not meant to be a political show, it is meant to be a simple one of electing...
Back
Top