Search results

  1. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, I would like to file a response to these objections tonight once I am home from work.
  2. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions Did you or another member of the DCT validate the eviction report filed by the Town of Oakridge before actioning the eviction? Did the specific report being disputed get reported on the forums before the plot was evicted? Did the town of Oakridge report the plot in a DCT...
  3. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, I wish to note that this image failed to upload previously to the forums, but it appears to be not working. We want to enter this image pulled directly from the 'Building Inspector Guide,' a document published on the DCT information and policy page. A document outlining the process...
  4. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Objection - Ambiguous/Nothing Pending (Answer to question 2) Your Honor, The witness's response to a simple question could have been written better. We asked if there is or is not a policy within our question. Can the court please compel the witness to answer the question? They are an...
  5. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions Do you message every individual being evicted that their plot will be evicted and not mention that you are not a part of the DCT? Under what authority do you have the ability to determine what properties are reported versus not being reported? Did the property that was...
  6. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions Does the DCT validate the reports before evicting them, or does it merely take the mayor's word and take action against them? Your response to question 3 states, "The DCT policy mandates that the job of Inspectors consists of filling reports on the forums." However, in your...
  7. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions You have indicated to the court that you are not a DCT employee. Can you please explain why you messaged my client on 6/11/24 informing them of an eviction of their plot? Please reference (P-005). Did you or the DCT decide to evict plot 'OR-VALLEY-15'? What was the reason...
  8. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Objection - Nothing Pending Your Honor, The answer to question 2 goes way outside the scope and the simple response of the question. We request that the response outside of the specific answer be struck. "As Oakridge Mayor I have very important relations to the department. Every paste the...
  9. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions Who has the authority to report plots within the DCT? Does the Mayor of Oakridge have the authority to evict plots? Does DCT policy mandate that BIs need to report the plots on the forums and send mail in-game?
  10. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Response to Objection Your Honor, We merely got out days confused in posting our response as I, in my head, firmly believed we had 48 hours to publish the questions to the witnesses. However, now looking back I realize I was gravely mistaken. I accept the contempt charge as I fully...
  11. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Yeet_Boy (@YeetBoy1872325 ) 1. Are you currently employed by the Department of Construction and Transportation? 2. What are your relations to the Department of Construction and Transportation? The_Superior10 (@The_Superior10 ) 1. What is your current Department of Construction and...
  12. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, Respectfully the time has come and gone and the defendant has failed to provide their response. We request a that we progress this case.
  13. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Opening Statements Your Honor, Today, I stand to defend not just the rights of my client, BoopingBerry, but the very principles of fairness and justice in our community. BoopingBerry is a dedicated and peace-loving resident of Oakridge, who has always adhered to the rules and contributed...
  14. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    your honor, I’d like to request a two hour extension I got held up at a family event, saying goodbye to my aunt before she flew home. I may be within the next hour. I sadly don’t have access to my computer.
  15. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, We would like to enter the following list of individuals to be our witnesses. 1. Yeet_Boy (Plaintiff) 2. TheSuperior (Inspection Manager in the DCT)
  16. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, We want to enter the following into evidence.
  17. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION BoopingBerry (Nacholebraa representing) Plaintiff v. Town of Oakridge Defendant COMPLAINT On 6/11/24, BoopingBerry, my client, received a notification from the Mayor of Oakridge, Yeet_Boy, informing her that the DCT would...
  18. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EMERGENCY INJUNCTION We request the court to freeze the plot mentioned below from being sold or held by the government in any capacity and restrict the commonwealth's ability to evict future plots in the same manner. Emergency injunctions are...
  19. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Yes, your honor, that is correct. I did not realize you were asking a clarifying question.
  20. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, We didn't submit the witnesses because we didn't need them, so there is nothing to strike. We did not submit the witness out of care and consideration for the Plaintiff, who we knew would just complain the whole time about it.
Back
Top