Search results

MOTION TO DISMISS Lack of Claim Your Honor, we have seen through the entire Discovery process and the Plaintiff has provided no new information that would assist within their case and the Defense enters in our original Motion to Dismiss as still valid arguments and we would like to increase our...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, this Objection is fruitless as stated within Exhibit D by Secretary Adam the quota was set to 5. OBJECTION Perjury Your Honor, to put this as simplistic as it can be. The Plaintiff is stating that there is no evidence within this case regarding a quota of 5...

Your Honor, apologies for posting this separately, I sent the message above on accident without the screenshots given I was providing them after writing this up. The screenshots are provided below however.

The only documentation is in the screenshots provided by the Plaintiff. Beyond that, there is also the screenshot provided below of the changelog within the Department of Health Discord. INTERROGATORY 1. How many attends did the Plaintiff have? 2. Did the Plaintiff reach the quota of 5...

MOTION TO DISMISS Under Court Rule 5.5, Lack of Claim While the Plaintiff does bring up some interesting arguments that are well worded the underlying tone is this, the Plaintiff failed to fulfill the quota set for that month. Why is this quota not posted anywhere? The quota changes per month...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT csimiami14 Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. We affirm that the Plaintiff was fired from the Department of Health. 2. We dispute that the Plaintiff was fired unfairly. II...

This Emergency Injunction will be granted and the DHS is to seize the 50k for the duration of the case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @WackJap is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. WackJap. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the...

I will not be recusing as regardless of that I will rule fairly. A good Presiding Officer can put it aside and to be completely honest, I would not have known about the censure if you had not told me within this lawsuit. This is also rejected as although there is maybe a bit of contradiction, I...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 14 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Unseattedduke1 was unfairly elected to the position of Chair of the Judicial Oversight Committee. 2. The Electoral Act states the the Supreme Court is to act...

The Motion to Recuse is already rejected. Your not going to continue down this road, your held in Contempt and at this point this is a waste of time. You stated you were fine with Fluffy ruling on the Recusal and they did when they did not have to. You are trying to pick your Judge which is...

Do you wish to drop the case then?

You are hereby held in Contempt again. These are already answered and what is honestly a shock is the fact that you can keep writing these yet fail to post your Opening Statement even with the extension.

Why not mention before?

No. I'm not entertaining this, your hereby held in Contempt and I order the DHS to jail/fine appropriately. This has already been ruled on and you are posting nearly identical Objection and Motions, they have already been ruled on and been ruled on by two other members of the Judiciary. That...

You already motioned for this twice. You cannot motion a third time.

I will be overruling this Motion to Reconsider as that is not a sufficient reason for us to host a Closed Court Session. You are to post the ticket transcripts within this lawsuit.

Thank you, the Defense now has 72 hours to present their Closing Statement.

Now you have no room to argue the ruling on the motion to recuse. This is also now rejected. I'll grant a 12 hour extension for you to post your Opening Statement.

This is your one and only warning. We are not going to keep going through this over and over again with slight changes the ruling is done. You have an Opening Statement that you have yet to post as you are sitting here attempting instigating an argument to find reasons for impeachment. Yes, I...