1.) The Department of Justitce reviews all subject matter and a multitude of diffrent things when it comes to the termination of an employee
2.) This is a borad statement that the DOJ does not agree with, there are a ton of legal professionals that are not employeed with the DOJ, so no.
3.)...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
Your honor this is a clear breach of procedure, no response was requested by the presiding officer. Furthermore the bio is not proof that this person works for the firm nor has the consent to work on this case. We request...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
Superwoops is not the attorney on record and has not provided that they are taking over the case or that they are even employeed with the Dragon Law Firm. For this we ask that both the Objection and the Motion to Comple be...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your honor, this person is not the original attorney on record and they have not brought it up to the court.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
EpicFought
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1.) The Commonwealth affirms that EpicFought contacted RealTV, They then had an argument about who was correct and EpicFought informed...
Motion to Reconsider is Denied i will be allowing it in this instance. This is a case in which we will be deciding to bar a lawyer, one of the most active ones within our community his ability to practice law in his current capacity.
This is something this court will not take lightly and in...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
steveshat v. wetc [2024] FCR 64
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. Steveshat won $1,800,000 from a game of Roulette in the Keystone Holdings Casino,
2. Keystone Holdings refused to pay the full 1.8 Million because they claimed the max bet was...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 114
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Solitary Confinement Order was unconstitutional because it violated the plaintiff's XIII right "Every citizen is equal before and under the law and has...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
In a 3-0 Decision, The Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal.
Majority opinion delivered by Justice Dr_Eksplosive
The Supreme Court will be upholding the Contempt Charge, on basis of law superseding court policy. It is court...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.