Search results

  1. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    I would like to apologize to the Court for this confusion. I would like to also motion to reconsider the contempt charge as I am only making motions to dismiss as I see them come up. They all have merit despite not being accepted by the Court, so much merit that response was solicited from the...
  2. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Your signature says otherwise. I motion for another judge to review the motion to recuse.
  3. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Ok you know what, impeding court proceedings my ass. I motion to recuse. The presiding judge is the Chairman of a competing bank which constitutes a conflict of interest.
  4. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence and speculation.
  5. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Objection, your honor. Speculation and assumes facts not in evidence.
  6. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Objection, your honor. Perjury. This is not true. A motion to dismiss cannot be entertained on an appeal, which is subtly but dramatically different than what the plaintiff is claiming. This case is not an appeal. The appeal was a separate case.
  7. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Motion to Dismiss Your honor, I move to dismiss under rule 5.5, lack of claim as well as lack of standing. Vanguard Bank did not own shares in Keystone at the time of the alleged damages. The allegations are from February but the stocks were transferred March 7th. They were sold to Vanguard...
  8. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Your honor I motion to dismiss with prejudice under rule 5.5 lack of claim. The Commercial Standards Act absolves my client of any alleged liability incurred by Keystone Holdings, as Vanguard was not in a management position. See below: Therefore there is no valid claim of wrongdoing by my...
  9. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Your honor, I object to exhibit A on the grounds of improper evidence as it is cropped. We can't see the context of that screenshot nor can we even see the Discord server it is in. The plaintiff should submit an uncropped screenshot. Your honor, I object to exhibit B on the grounds of improper...
  10. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT steveshat Plaintiff v. Vanguard Bank Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. Fact one is disputed by the defense. 2. Fact two is disputed by the defense. 3. Fact three is disputed by the defense. 4. Fact four is disputed by...
  11. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Your honor, the answer to complaint was already submitted. I motion to move to discovery.
  12. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Objection your honor breach of procedure. A response was not warranted.
  13. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Pending Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62

    Your honor, as Chief Legal Officer of Discover / Vanguard Bank, we apologize for the delay. Counsel has been fired and me along with WhyDoesThisWork will be be taking over. We will issue a response to complaint as follows: T (Yes this is intentional, before anyone calls me crazy there is logic...
  14. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen v. Redmont Bar Association [2024] FCR 46

    K, I motion to reconsider. Court procedure never says a closing statement is mandatory.
  15. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen v. Redmont Bar Association [2024] FCR 46

    Court procedure never says a closing statement is compulsory, your honor.
  16. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen v. Redmont Bar Association [2024] FCR 46

    Your honor, a closing statement wasn’t necessary. Why am I being held in contempt when providing a closing statement is not mandatory?
Back
Top