Search results

Questions for @1950Minecrafter 1. Did you see the vote for the Judicial Oversight Committee chair after the 24 hour period? 2. If you did see the vote, What did it look like? Im reserving the right to ask follow up questions

It was a responses as you allotted me 24 hours to respond to the objection and so I did

OPENING STATEMENT When first looking at this case it seems that this case only fringes on one thing. Did end vote within the 24 hour period? To answer this question simply look at Exhibit B and C. Exhibit B is a screenshot after the 24 hour time frame and Exhibit C is the date at which the...

Your Honor, Discovery ended almost 4 days ago and I would like to move on with this case

Nay - kneejerk reaction to a very niche set of circumstances.

The defense states these statements dont shed light on facts in the case. They infact do shed light on facts in this case including the validity of ends testimony. These question ask The motive behind Ends testimony since he wrote one of the bills being contested and because the precedent in...

No further questions your Honor

Response to Objection Nothing there in any question is making an arguement. Those are valid questions about the validity of End's Testimony while giving a sentence of context so the questions arent considered vague. Every statement before each question is stating a fact that has already been...

Questions for @End 1. As you did write one of the bills in question, Why should one take your testimony at face value when you could be trying to protect your bill? 2. As already shown the case being used as precedent negatively impacted you, Why should one believe you are not giving testimony...

(Almost forgot) Objection for Calls for Narrative: All I am doing is asking why is the witness's testimony creditable. It a simple question and if the witness should need to provide a Narrative means that there are multiple reason one would consider their testimony not creditable which would...

Response to Objections Objections for Testifying: I am giving context to let the court and the witness know why I am asking the questions. These questions on their own would not make much sense without said context and would be objected to for Vagueness. Objections for Witness incompetents: I...

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION to STRIKE AlexanderLove is not employeed by the DLA as a Prosecutor and therefore does not have the power to represent the commonwealth. As he is not apart of this case in the slightest. I motion to strike everything that AlexanderLove has just...

I noticed a typo in one of my questions and wish to amend my first question to Why should the court believe that you are not giving this testimony today out of self interest?

"What is the DCT's policy regarding the inclusion of the "$" sign in a player's bid during a DCT auction?" There is no written policy for the DCT when it comes to either needing or not needing a $ for your bid. I know the DOC does have that policy but as the DCT runs Eviction auctions we dont...

Questions for @End 1. You are someone who takes a lot of pride in the bill they write. You are often seen in press releases bragging about the number of bills you have written. As you wrote one of the bills in question. Why should the court not believe that you are not giving this testimony...

You Honor, I wish for the other members of the Supreme court to decide on this recusal and not you. You are of course going to feel that your actions so far are valid and should not be recused. According to Rule 4.9 in the Court Rules and Procedure it states: "In order for a witness to be...

Present

Your Honor, I would like to call: 1950Minecrafter - a member of the JOC and someone who watched and voted in the election in querstion

MOTION TO RECUSE Your Honor, You have worked with snowy in the DLA extensively as both her boss and her employee. I held from asking for a recusal because I thought you would have more impartialness. It is clear that this is not the case. For no reason you allowed the defense to submit their...

Questions for @End Here is a screenshot of part of the verdict to refresh your memory. 1. So if the precedent being used went against you, is it true that it could be seen as beneficial for you to give witness testimony that refutes said precedent