Search results

  1. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    OBJECTION Relevence? This is just insulting to the Plaintiff, Your Honor.
  2. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, Half the answer that was struck was relevant to the question. The plaintiff's initial reaction was surprise and they described it by saying that they were not expecting their words to be used in that manner. "I was not expecting my words to be used like that"...
  3. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    Did the refusal by the defendant to comply make the damages relating to the situation any harder to bear?
  4. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    Witness Questions for Unseatedduke1 1. Can you describe your initial reaction when you first read The Radish's article titled "Judge Unseatedduke1 Joins Fight Against Big Media"? 2. Were you asked for your words to be used in that article? 3. Did you want your words to be used in that article...
  5. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bardiya_King v. CrackedAmeoba1 [2024] DCR 29

    The Plaintiff agrees with summary judgement.
  6. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    OPENING STATEMENT Good afternoon, Your Honor. This case is fairly straightforward. The Radish, a news reporting company, published an article containing false, defamatory, and libelous statements about the plaintiff, Unseatedduke1. These statements not only misconstrued the plaintiff’s...
  7. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bardiya_King v. CrackedAmeoba1 [2024] DCR 29

    RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS The Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to deny the Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that the Defendant's arguments are fundamentally flawed and unsupported by the applicable laws and facts of the case. The Defendant argues that the current case should be...
  8. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bardiya_King v. CrackedAmeoba1 [2024] DCR 29

    OBJECTION Hearsay D-003 is an out-of-court statement that cannot be cross-examined. The witness should testify to this in court.
  9. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bardiya_King v. CrackedAmeoba1 [2024] DCR 29

    OBJECTION Relevance. The improperly labeled evidence provided by the defendant titled Exhibit D-003 does not constitute relevance to this case.
  10. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the motion to dismiss in question provided no actual argument for why the claim in question should be dismissed. According to the Intellectual Property Act, we have the right to sue for breach of contract for copying an individual's work and displaying an...
  11. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    COUNTER OBJECTION This piece of evidence (P-007) is relevant because it is proof of a continued and sustained attack against the plaintiff as the defendant continues to write libelous and defamatory statements in retaliation for a lawsuit.
  12. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    COUNTER OBJECTION The Hearsay exception is applied because the statement in question is evidence of AugustusPlays/Dartanboy's reputation and/or character. Cite Objections Guide.
  13. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    The Plaintiff would not be open to scheduling an in-game trial at this time.
  14. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    Your Honor, the 24-hour extension has passed. The Plaintiff requests we move forward.
  15. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    Note to court: The original complaint has now officially been amended.
  16. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bardiya_King v. CrackedAmeoba1 [2024] DCR 29

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Bardiya_King, Plaintiff v. CrackedAmoeba1, Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES Bardiya_King, Plaintiff CrackedAmoeba1, Defendant The Town of Oakridge II. FACTS On...
  17. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    WITNESS LIST SUBMISSION Witnesses for the Plaintiff are as follows: 1. Unseatedduke1
  18. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    2. Would you say that being a patron of a company is a bad thing? Depending on the company and the perception of an individual, being a patron of a company could be either good, bad, or neutral.
  19. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT The Plaintiff respectfully requests this honorable Court to grant leave to amend the original Complaint pursuant to Rule 3.3. Amendments Sought: Addition to Parties: The Plaintiff requests to formally add AugustusPlays as a party to this case. The Plaintiff...
  20. IncompleteRiver

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26

    Your honor, we answered the question as presented. If we are going to be asked to compel we would like to submit an objection to the question for the following reasons: 1. The question was leading. 2. The question calls for a conclusion. 3. The question was inflammatory. The defense asked this...
Back
Top