IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
A, "Favorable Outcome," is an opinion and one may count a victory differently than another person. One could say, "He's lost all of his cases because the verdicts never rule in favor of him," while another could say...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Your honor, the plaintiff named the owner and sole shareholder of the company. We understand that this is failure under the Commercial Standards Act, however, we ask that we just amend it instead of dismissing...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION
Asked and answered, your honor. When the witness was asked, "Have you ever won a case?" he responded with, "I've never lost a court case." Any citizen would realize that if you've never lost a court case, you must've won all of them...
A
BILL
TO
Establish the Oakridge Police Department, outline what deputies are, and increase policing in Oakridge
The citizens of Oakridge, through their elected Representatives in the Town-Council and the force of law ordained to that Town-Council by the people through the constitution of...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
The defense moves that the ruling made by you, your honor, be reverted, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1) It is important to uphold the law, despite the circumstances. It is unacceptable to pardon the prosecution...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Bardiya_King
JustA_Dumpling
Plaintiff
V
CrackedAmoeba1
Defendant
COMPLAINT
On the 3rd of April, 2024, The Daily Chuckle, owned by CrackedAmoeba1, launched a defaming/false article about plaintiff Bardiya_King (P-001). It...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
The defense moves that the question made by the prosecution be struck from the record, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1) The prosecution has spoken out of turn, as they were not told to make a response by you...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
The defense moves that the question made by the prosecution be struck from the record, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1) The question was posted after the alloted time had expired, and therefore the prosecution...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
Redmont Bar Association
Prosecution
V
Royalsnakee
Defendant
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
1) Did you ever make rude remarks when you were not put under pressure?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
Redmont Bar Association
Prosecution
V
Royalsnakee
Defendant
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
1) Have you decided to recklessly abandon the path of lawfulness?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
Redmont Bar Association
Prosecution
V
Royalsnakee
Defendant
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
1) Do you represent your clients to the best of your ability?
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
The point of a witness testimony is to ask witnesses questions about an incident. This doesn't mean that there has to already be concrete proof, as that would defeat the purpose of a witness testimony. In other words, the witness testimony, definitive or not...
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
The definition of "Assumes facts not in evidence" is the following: "the question assumes something as true for which no evidence has been shown." The question which I asked doesn't assume something to be true. The witness testimony is meant to shed light on whether it is...
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
Your honor,
Based on the "Staff Insight" image, xEndeavour, the owner of the server, clearly states that forum bans may be put in place if deemed necessary. It is still possible that a staff member deemed it necessary to forum ban the witness.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
Redmont Bar Association
Prosecution
V
Royalsnakee
Defendant
QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESS
1) Were you banned from the forums?
2) Did you intentionally abandon posting messages in the lawsuits you were involved in?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your honor, may it please the court,
Many of the contempt of court charges were caused by a staff forum ban. Even assuming that they weren’t, the prosecution’s wording compared to the Redmont Bar Association Charter is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.