Appeal: Denied [2024] FCR 71 - Appeal Request

[Meowow55]

- Client Name: Starlight0661

- Counsel Name: Meowow55

- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff

- Reason for the Appeal:

1. The reason why the case was declined was because we had a "lack of claim", however we believe that with additional clarification, we would be able to show the Judge that we in fact, do have a very valid claim. To start, the defendant originally promised the plaintiff $5,000 to make the first 15 minutes/first half of a ~25 minute video. However, it turned out that the defendant was unable to download the footage, so he asked the plaintiff to work on the other half. The plaintiff did so, and instead of being paid at least double the $5,000 initially promised (as that would make sense considering the $5,000 was promised for just one half of a video, and the plaintiff did the other half and more), the plaintiff was only paid an additional $3,000, making a total of $8,000. The Contracts Act states that "this covenant shall be read into contracts to ensure that the parties act with honesty, integrity, and fairness", and the defendant's refusal to pay just a bit more was unfair and unjust, thus being a violation of the Act.

- Additional Information: This is some additional evidence. The first screenshot shows proof of the defendant claiming that the plaintiff would be paid $5k for editing 15 minutes of a video, and the second screenshot shows that the defendant would pay $8k for the finished product.

 

[Dartanboy]

This appeal was lost in the business and re-organization. The court apologizes for the delay and will respond soon.

 

[Dartanboy]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DECISION ON APPEAL

The Supreme Court, in a 3-0 decision, upholds the Federal Court's decision to dismiss the case based on lack of claim.