Lawsuit: Pending AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont

juniperberries

Citizen
Supporter
juniperfig
juniperfig
Attorney
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
6

Case Filing



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


AlexanderLove (represented by juniperfig)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

AlexanderLove was unfairly denied his rightful nomination as Secretary of the DCT. Acting President lcn ignored the proper constitutional process and refused to move the nomination forward, solely due to political bias. This decision violated AlexanderLove’s right to equal treatment under the law and set an unfair, baseless standard.

I. PARTIES
1. AlexanderLove (Plaintiff)
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. President UnityMaster informed AlexanderLove that he would be nominated as Secretary of the Department of Construction and Transportation (DCT). (P-001)

2. UnityMaster also informed Vice President lcn of this decision. (P-002)

3. Vice President lcn assumed the role of Acting President during UnityMaster’s deportation. (P-003)

4. Acting President lcn did not follow his obligation to honor UnityMaster’s nomination of AlexanderLove as Secretary of the DCT. (P-004)

5. Acting President lcn dismissed President UnityMaster’s explicit nomination of AlexanderLove, claiming it was “not valid” through arbitrary, invented requirements for nomination validity. (P-004)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Redmont’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees every citizen the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without unfair discrimination, including on the basis of political belief (Section XIII).

By refusing to honor AlexanderLove’s nomination to Secretary of the DCT, Acting President lcn denied AlexanderLove equal benefit of the Constitutional nomination process and subjected AlexanderLove to unfair discrimination based on political belief.


2. Nomination of a Secretary, as outlined in the constitution, is a two-step process. First, the President nominates an individual for a role. Second, the Senate approves (or disapproves) the nomination.

President UnityMaster fulfilled the first step by explicitly stating his intent to nominate AlexanderLove. This created a legitimate expectation that AlexanderLove’s nomination would proceed to Senate approval, as per the constitution.

lcn arbitrarily bypassed this Constitutional process. There is nothing in the Constitution stating nominations must be announced publicly- AlexanderLove was unfairly subjected to a standard that does not exist.

Acting President lcn’s decision to disregard President UnityMaster’s nomination was rooted solely in a political shift in power and not in any legitimate or constitutional basis.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $15,717 in compensatory damages for lost wages for the period of time between January 7, 2025 and February 15, 2025. January 7, 2025 was the day AlexanderLove’s nomination was meant to be announced according to P-002. February 15, 2025 would be the commencement of the next administration, when AlexanderLove would likely leave office. $15,717 was calculated by the following formula: ($260/hour * 1.55 hours/day * 39 days).
Secretaries are paid at a rate of $65 per 15 minutes of being active in-game. AlexanderLove is active in-game for an average of 1.55 hours per day (P-005). 39 days is the timespan specified above.

2. $30,000 in punitive damages. Violating a citizen’s constitutional right to equal treatment should be the dictionary definition of “outrageous conduct”, doubly so when these actions are done by the Acting President.

3. $25,000 in emotional damages. lcn’s dismissal of Alex’s nomination created a sense of betrayal, insecurity, and stress due to the unexpected and unjust nature of the decision. It also undermined AlexanderLove’s trust in the fairness of the government, causing ongoing anxiety about his standing in the community.

4. $35,000 in damages for Loss of Enjoyment. The arbitrary denial of this role deprived AlexanderLove of the fulfillment, satisfaction, and pride he would have gained from serving his community in this capacity. Alex furthermore began preparing policies and plans at this point for the Department that went to waste due to lcn’s decision to not honour legal process.

5. $31,715 in legal fees, 30% of the value of this case, to cover the costs the plaintiff incurred hiring juniperfig as his legal counsel in this case.

V. EVIDENCE

AD_4nXewzBWqlDh80a5U5_KdzMpjJfh2TpbwlQICgbfbJ8YMfoeA5JJeNOJx0ILn_WKHWEFAvZB8a9lSqabZCroRdWd3OWkP5rZCTCDId179w9zf5NvKv3VKrxaC405xrYOkS4ek2BivBg

AD_4nXeNHPwsCMBQjlIa7GuqK8nNzpVr8KvESDFb1CA4TqjkOxMOOSLqwbac21UD_rxqmJDdWwKyumG7Tvw-G6BMUDiOEoLbR-tZd4uSx7LcwyQWq2jHCb7bjTsMKIo6skMOWGaoZAk-Lg

AD_4nXf954kiU81_bcorFb3ZhKwhE7668hMyknXnQDgoEpR8yrUBIg_oKQEmthhp2Htm5e5K1gLUL8HSBf_ctec3hxjQfgvm8CG5zBk32-26f1weR6PnYNIzQlaBNbEUSmv5Ch5MgeP9Cw

AD_4nXcjS1XaDnqtciBbknorEuZcWnpXFV-82gBC3Jvh1Zj090nzWd14ONTuMsfEcX2FIfAFBscKBOi2gVNDn9BrrSVimPrGz50Pp7HdfjChG2KLjatZKPo0Kvo6ns4PNnRdEWRPahX0SA

AD_4nXeEz4OphliF3y_0-OTeZHD5OVi8f2QJjTcQfbJZCNDduRS16yF2CFHW4jqOEGKQ_3niCSDYdJR8NT7CqT4HQNiaVUuwqUuacRXh3XMq-eh4q1dj4VHLDGBJUnKgiUlB5ro7vmaU4Q


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18th day of January, 2025.

Proof of Representation:
1737186821493.png


 
Last edited:
Requesting to file an amicus brief
 
Requesting to file an amicus brief
Your honor, respectfully, we don’t need an amicus brief from every single person and their two cents who wish to act as secondary defendants. This is also the federal court. I ask the court deny this request.
 
Requesting to file an amicus brief
For the interest of the court, what matters do you wish to discuss and what are your relevant qualifications?
 

Writ of Summons



@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
For the interest of the court, what matters do you wish to discuss and what are your relevant qualifications?

Constitutional law expert to discuss Executive Discretion and considerations for political questions in court
 
Constitutional law expert to discuss Executive Discretion and considerations for political questions in court
Thank you. Please proceed with your brief.
 

Writ of Summons



@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Good morning, your honor. I will be representing the Commonwealth in this case.
 
Good morning, your honor. I will be representing the Commonwealth in this case.
Thank you prosecutor.

Discovery is hereby set for a period of 72 hours, and may be cut short upon mutual agreement by both plaintiff and defense.
 
The Defense submits the following evidence:

Screenshot_20250121_192559_Minecraft.jpg


Note that my timezone is Central Time.

Screenshot_20250121_104536_Discord.jpg
 
The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:

AD_4nXebzWlXzTbCgxtpkze4N-eeh3D7MpQ3FP5V89cDU7MPL36vhbFacy_P5mfTRVYcELqjMkJ87DyHe89f3IU1dpvUovV6-kDJWpFrO4WKy9qjZU6ZN7DWoviGWMBaIv8uuoeTaaSejw

Note that my timezone is Pacific Time.

AD_4nXenovncsSg_nkNXoUNPZefvYB75AdjAey-A8NmZR-JSgC4idhaYdDnhnBb76hG2xXmq0s3G2gIYBM6ahnuSk6nVJ2frOKXBgHjY2_rX-VcZ8PipWd9Wv0EoOC3aihNp3acFbYH4
 
The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:

AD_4nXebzWlXzTbCgxtpkze4N-eeh3D7MpQ3FP5V89cDU7MPL36vhbFacy_P5mfTRVYcELqjMkJ87DyHe89f3IU1dpvUovV6-kDJWpFrO4WKy9qjZU6ZN7DWoviGWMBaIv8uuoeTaaSejw

Note that my timezone is Pacific Time.

AD_4nXenovncsSg_nkNXoUNPZefvYB75AdjAey-A8NmZR-JSgC4idhaYdDnhnBb76hG2xXmq0s3G2gIYBM6ahnuSk6nVJ2frOKXBgHjY2_rX-VcZ8PipWd9Wv0EoOC3aihNp3acFbYH4
 OBJECTION
Relevance

These Executive Orders have nothing to do with the situation at hand.
 
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION

Your honour, the timing of the executive orders, combined with lcn's subsequent repealing of them, strongly support the legitimacy of a deported President’s actions. If the defence intends to rely on the time of deportation to challenge Former President Unity’s authority, then my evidence demonstrating the continued use and recognition of his Presidential powers during his deportation is both relevant and necessary to provide full context.
 
 OBJECTION
Relevance

These Executive Orders have nothing to do with the situation at hand.
Overruled.

The Plaintiff has provided reasonable justification for the submission of the evidence.
 
The Defense submits the following:

Screenshot_20250122_074755_Discord.jpg
 
Back
Top