Lawsuit: Pending AmityBlamity v. Iresmani_I [2025] DCR 5

[AmityBlamity]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


AmityBlamity
Plaintiff

v.

Iresmani_I
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On or about the 10th of January, 2025, While walking around Reveile, I stumbled upon the Defendant assaulting another citizen. Before I could react, the Defendant turned his axe on me and attempted to kill me. I was forced to gun him down in self-defense, but not before suffering an injury to my hand (see p-001 and p-002). Following this attempted murder, I questioned the Defendant as to why he had hit me with an axe, to which he said "I want your head Amity" (p-003).

I made a trip to Revhospital to receive medical treatment. Upon informing the Defendant I was doing so, the Defendant stated that "now I know where to kill you" (p-004).

Later, upon returning to spawn, Defendant once again attacked me. They made two additional attempts to murder me (showcased in p-005 to p-010, where the Defendant said to "Pls gimme head Amity"; and p-011 to p-013, where the defendant laughed as they attacked me).

The actions taken by the Defendant have inflicted not just physical damage, but significant emotional damage as well. I am now afraid to leave my home, for fear of being attacked by some murderous individual, laughing while wanting to decapitate me. I humbly request that the court grant my prayers for relief, so that I might start to rebuild my shattered life.

I. PARTIES
1. AmityBlamity
2. Iresmani_I

II. FACTS
1. On or about the 10th of January, 2025, plaintiff was assaulted in Reveile by the defendant. Defendant attempted to kill plaintiff.
2. After killing the Defendant in self-defense, plaintiff made their way to the hospital. Plaintiff was further threatened with murder by the Defendant.
3. A short while later, plaintiff was attacked two additional times at spawn by the Defendant. Defendant once again announced their intention to kill. Plaintiff once again was forced to kill Defendant in self-defense in order to stay alive.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant's actions caused physical and emotional injury to the Plaintiff.
2. The Defendant's actions are a blatant violation of the law, creating a fearful, depressive environment.
3. As a result of the Defendant's actions, the Plaintiff has suffered emotional distress and a loss of enjoyment.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $300 in Compensatory Damages to refund the cost of medical care.
2. $500 in Emotional Damages.
3. $200 in Constitutional Damages due to the Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 10th day of January, 2025

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@iresmani_I is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of AmityBlamity v. iresmani_i [2025] DCR 5

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Your Honor,
I am now present as the Defence Attorney.

 

[ko531]

We will now enter Discovery. Discovery will last 72 hours starting now.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. The Plaintiff has committed Perjury after saying to need Medical Care after he was allegedly assaulted even though there can't be physical injuries which cost more than 300$ after (alleged) Assault as claimed here.
2. Also why didn't the Plaintiff call the Police at the Scence? If he did this Case must be dismissed as the Defendant has been punished previously.
3. The Plaintiff is Carring a Firearm at Spawn which is a Safe zone and we wish to Counter sue on this matter.

 

[ko531]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. The Plaintiff has committed Perjury after saying to need Medical Care after he was allegedly assaulted even though there can't be physical injuries which cost more than 300$ after (alleged) Assault as claimed here.
2. Also why didn't the Plaintiff call the Police at the Scence? If he did this Case must be dismissed as the Defendant has been punished previously.
3. The Plaintiff is Carring a Firearm at Spawn which is a Safe zone and we wish to Counter sue on this matter.

Denied

This case falls under Court Rule 2.2(b) or in better words the Small Claims Exceptions. Because this case is not asking for more then $2500 it is immune to dismissal.

I would also like to clarify for the defense on points 2 and 3. For point 2 there is a difference between criminal damages and civil damages. Just because you are punished criminally does not mean you are immune to civil damages. For point 3, you can not countersue based on the idea that the opposing party allegedly committed a crime as you do not have the power to impose or prosecute for criminal damages. You may countersue for civil damages.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Your Honor, I wish to submit the following images into evidence: p-014 and p-015.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Your Honor, both the Defense and I are in agreement on ending Discovery early.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Your Honor, both the Defense and I are in agreement on ending Discovery early.

Confirmed.

 

[ko531]

The Plaintiff has 72 hours to post their opening statement

 

[AmityBlamity]

Opening Statement

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

May it please the Court,

Your honor, opposing counsel, and others following this case, each and every one of us is bound by the law. It exists to guide the citizens of this great nation, to protect those dealt grave injustices, and to punish those who consider themselves above it.

iresmani_I does not just consider himself above the law. He considers those who follow it beneath him. The violence he has unleashed against our wonderful nation will make for a dark chapter in our history. And while I have full confidence in our officers to charge him criminally, the fact remains that many of us have been harmed. As I have highlighted in evidence submitted in this lawsuit, iresmani severely injured me on several occasions, and saw fit not just to attack me, but to revel in the harm he was causing.

I am not without mercy. I have attempted to settle this case outside of the courts, with conditions most favourable to iresmani. However, these ouvertures have been shunned, and I must now turn to the courts and humbly plead that they may right what has been wronged.

I hope that iresmani might one day seek to rejoin the society he has shunned. Until that day however, I respectfully ask that this court grant the Prayers of Relief requested in my complaint, as both a remedy to the pain suffered... and as punishment to a man who seeks only to hurt.

Thank you.

 

[ko531]

Defense has 72 hours to post their Opening statements

 

[Babysoga4real]

Opening Statement

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The Defendant clearly stated that he feels remorse and understands what he has done. The Defence therefore does not think its fair nore just to insult him as someone who only seeks to only hurt as this no longer applies. The Defendant understands his wrong doings. Though the Defendant accidently assaulted the Plaintiff but was very scared when the Plaintiff pulled a gun. The Plaintiff opened Fire on the Defendant who feelt threatened by the Plaintiff and therefore tried to take them out of Action before being Statement Plaintiff: "Guned down." Which I interpret as Murder. The defence is ready to pay any Medical bills as a sign of good faith though feels they were emotional hit harder than the Plaintiff.

 

[ko531]

As no witnesses were called, the plaintiff has 72 hours to post their closing statement

 

[Babysoga4real]

[MISSCLICK]

 

[AmityBlamity]

Closing Statement

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

It is disgraceful for the Defendant's counsel to claim that the Defendant clearly stated he feels remorse and understands what he has done. P-015 shows someone who isn't genuinely apologetic for their actions, but instead someone who demands legal action be halted against him in exchange for maybe not killing anyone else. That's not repentance. That's an ultimatum. Furthermore, if the Defendant truly were remorseful, they would not have killed me after this lawsuit was filed, as described in P-014.

In addition, if it would please the court, I have made great efforts to settle this matter with the Defendant. I was willing to drop all financial relief in exchange for two things: a written apology from the Defendant, and the return of my head which he cut from my corpse. If the Defendant were truly apologetic of his actions, the absolute minimum he could do is provide an apology. He has failed to meet this lowest of thresholds.

In addition, the counsel for the Defense is skirting dangerously close to perjury. They have seen the evidence I have submitted. The Defendant did not accidentally hit me. He attacked me on no less than four separate occasions (killing me on one of them, as described in P-014), reveling in the harm he unleashed. This is nothing more than a disgusting lie to damage my credibility, in hopes of escaping justice for his actions.

I beseech the court to stand up for the good citizens of Redmont and to deliver a clear message to the Defendant that his violent acts will not go unpunished.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Your Honor, I wish to submit the following images into evidence: p-014 and p-015.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE

This evidence is not relevant to the issue at hand because it does not pertain to the facts of the case.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Assumes facts not in evidence

The Opposing Party is cleary assuming facts which aren't proven by any Evidence or Witness such as the Defence lying which is not acceptable by any means.

Closing Statement

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

It is disgraceful for the Defendant's counsel to claim that the Defendant clearly stated he feels remorse and understands what he has done. P-015 shows someone who isn't genuinely apologetic for their actions, but instead someone who demands legal action be halted against him in exchange for maybe not killing anyone else. That's not repentance. That's an ultimatum. Furthermore, if the Defendant truly were remorseful, they would not have killed me after this lawsuit was filed, as described in P-014.

In addition, if it would please the court, I have made great efforts to settle this matter with the Defendant. I was willing to drop all financial relief in exchange for two things: a written apology from the Defendant, and the return of my head which he cut from my corpse. If the Defendant were truly apologetic of his actions, the absolute minimum he could do is provide an apology. He has failed to meet this lowest of thresholds.

In addition, the counsel for the Defense is skirting dangerously close to perjury. They have seen the evidence I have submitted. The Defendant did not accidentally hit me. He attacked me on no less than four separate occasions (killing me on one of them, as described in P-014), reveling in the harm he unleashed. This is nothing more than a disgusting lie to damage my credibility, in hopes of escaping justice for his actions.

I beseech the court to stand up for the good citizens of Redmont and to deliver a clear message to the Defendant that his violent acts will not go unpunished.

.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE

This evidence is not relevant to the issue at hand because it does not pertain to the facts of the case.

Response to Objection:

Your Honor, this appears to be nothing more than an attempt to waste the court's time. Defendant's counsel agreed to end Discovery early. If they had an issue with the evidence I submitted, why didn't they raise an objection during Discovery?

 

[AmityBlamity]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Assumes facts not in evidence

The Opposing Party is cleary assuming facts which aren't proven by any Evidence or Witness such as the Defence lying which is not acceptable by any means.


.

Response to Objection:

The burden of proof is on Defendant's counsel here. Defendant's counsel claimed that Defendant felt "remorse and understands what he has done" yet has offered neither Evidence nor Witness to justify these claims. I countered this argument in my Closing Statement with Evidence presented to the court.

 

[ko531]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE

This evidence is not relevant to the issue at hand because it does not pertain to the facts of the case.

Overruled
Your time to object to evidence has come and gone when discovery ended.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Assumes facts not in evidence

The Opposing Party is cleary assuming facts which aren't proven by any Evidence or Witness such as the Defence lying which is not acceptable by any means.


.

Overruled
You have made an argument, they claiming to be false and as there is no evidence to support your argument they plaintiff has every right to question its legitimacy.

 

[ko531]

The Defense has 72 hours to provide their opening statements