Towloo
Citizen
Representative
Homeland Security Department
Oakridge Resident
Statesman
Popular in the Polls
4th Anniversary
Change Maker
Towloo
Representative
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2023
- Messages
- 360
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
APPEAL
Your honor, in Lawsuit: Adjourned - ANDREASP15 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] DCR 5 the ruling made by Chief Justice Mathew100x was made on an assumption, and wrongfully stated that my client was suing the wrong person.
The justice points out that dimitre977 was willing to bid the $8,000, so therefore he must’ve been willing to bid $9,000 when he bid $9. There are two main reasons why this is false: The first, is that even if dimitre977 wanted to bid $9,000, all he bid was $9. Many people may assume this to be $9,000, however, numbers are numbers, and $9 is equal to $9. The second is that even though Mathew100x points out that dimitre977 was willing to bid $8,000, so he was willing to bid $9,000. This is false. There is no evidence supporting the fact that he was willing to bid $9,000 at the time, as he only bid $9. Even if there was evidence, under the Foundation of Contract law, the bid can’t be vague or ambiguous (dimitre977’s is both). With all this in mind, the bid made by dimitre977 was invalid, while my client’s wasn’t.
When reading the above paragraph, it is clear that my client has a right, and to get the property he rightfully deserves he must sue the auctioneer for it. This is because at the time of the incident, the Commonwealth owned it, and it was the Commonwealth’s mistake to accept the invalid bid. To clarify, the Commonwealth should be ordered to seize c718 from dimitre977, obviously compensating him, and transfer it to my client (ANDREASP15).
Your honor, the above paragraphs directly invalidate the court’s opinion from Lawsuit: Adjourned - ANDREASP15 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] DCR 5. If the court’s opinion was invalid, all parties involved should get a second chance to present the case. Therefore, I respectfully ask that due to the false opinions laid out by the court, the plaintiff be allowed to refile this case in Federal Court.
APPEAL
Your honor, in Lawsuit: Adjourned - ANDREASP15 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] DCR 5 the ruling made by Chief Justice Mathew100x was made on an assumption, and wrongfully stated that my client was suing the wrong person.
The justice points out that dimitre977 was willing to bid the $8,000, so therefore he must’ve been willing to bid $9,000 when he bid $9. There are two main reasons why this is false: The first, is that even if dimitre977 wanted to bid $9,000, all he bid was $9. Many people may assume this to be $9,000, however, numbers are numbers, and $9 is equal to $9. The second is that even though Mathew100x points out that dimitre977 was willing to bid $8,000, so he was willing to bid $9,000. This is false. There is no evidence supporting the fact that he was willing to bid $9,000 at the time, as he only bid $9. Even if there was evidence, under the Foundation of Contract law, the bid can’t be vague or ambiguous (dimitre977’s is both). With all this in mind, the bid made by dimitre977 was invalid, while my client’s wasn’t.
When reading the above paragraph, it is clear that my client has a right, and to get the property he rightfully deserves he must sue the auctioneer for it. This is because at the time of the incident, the Commonwealth owned it, and it was the Commonwealth’s mistake to accept the invalid bid. To clarify, the Commonwealth should be ordered to seize c718 from dimitre977, obviously compensating him, and transfer it to my client (ANDREASP15).
Your honor, the above paragraphs directly invalidate the court’s opinion from Lawsuit: Adjourned - ANDREASP15 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] DCR 5. If the court’s opinion was invalid, all parties involved should get a second chance to present the case. Therefore, I respectfully ask that due to the false opinions laid out by the court, the plaintiff be allowed to refile this case in Federal Court.
