Lawsuit: In Session Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8

[Boomsides]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Bardiya_King (Represented by Dragon Law Firm)
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Plaintiff, Bardiya_King, alleges that the Department of Interior (DOI), as an agency of the Commonwealth of Redmont, engaged in an unfair, biased, and hostile application process. This resulted in the Plaintiff being unjustly rejected from the DOI, causing emotional distress, humiliation, and loss of enjoyment in Redmont.

I. PARTIES

1. Plaintiff: Bardiya_King, an individual who applied to the Department of Interior (DOI).
2. Defendant: The Commonwealth of Redmont
3. kvogt2340, an official associated with the DOI application process herein known as the "Defendant’s representative."

II. FACTS

1. The Plaintiff applied to the DOI and was rejected.
2. The Plaintiff opened a ticket to inquire about the reasons for the rejection.
3. The Defendant’s representative responded to the ticket, providing feedback, which the Plaintiff acknowledged.
4. After two weeks, the Plaintiff reapplied to the DOI, incorporating the feedback provided in the ticket.
5. During this time, the Plaintiff “voice-rejected” (the act of using permissions to ban an individual from joining a voice chat) the Defendant’s representative from a voice chat (VC).
6. The Defendant’s representative found out about this action and confronted the Plaintiff.
7. The Plaintiff explained their actions.
8. The Defendant’s representative responded to the explanation with the threat, “You do realize that your application is still in voting.”
9. The Plaintiff then received a second rejection from the DOI.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant’s representative’s actions, including threats and bias, compromised the fairness of the DOI application process breaching Part IV, §33, Point XIII of the Constitution which specifically says “Every citizen is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without unfair discrimination and, in particular, without unfair discrimination based on political belief or social status.”
2. The Plaintiff further claims that the Defendant’s representative’s conduct violates principles of impartiality and procedural fairness which further breaches Part III §29 Paragraph Two of the constitution which declares that “Executive Offices and Officers are required to remain unbiased, impartial and are required to defend the constitution and the laws of the commonwealth.”

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

The Plaintiff seeks the following relief, as outlined by the Legal Damages Act, based on the Defendant’s wrongful conduct and its violation of constitutional principles:

1. Consequential Damages:
   • Emotional Damages: The Plaintiff requests $20,000 for emotional distress caused by the unjust rejection process and the threatening behavior of DOI officials. While no formal psychological assessment is available, the Plaintiff experienced significant emotional strain due to the unfair treatment, ongoing threats, and anxiety caused by the Defendant's conduct. The Plaintiff’s own account of the emotional harm suffered, including feelings of stress and frustration, substantiates the claim that the actions of the Defendant caused substantial emotional distress, impairing the Plaintiff's ability to engage fully within Redmont.
   • Humiliation Damages: The Plaintiff seeks $15,000 for the humiliation suffered publicly in global chat and during the DOI application process. The Defendant’s representative, kvogt2340, engaged in behavior that led to the Plaintiff being publicly ridiculed, resulting in damage to the Plaintiff’s reputation within the community. This chat took place within a public space and was responsible for the embarrassment that the Plaintiff felt. This humiliation was caused by the Defendant’s treatment, which directly impacted the Plaintiff's standing in Redmont, causing embarrassment and distress.
   • Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont: The Plaintiff requests $10,000 for the loss of enjoyment in Redmont, which arose directly from the unfair DOI application process. The Plaintiff was unjustly denied an opportunity to participate in DOI-related activities, causing them to feel isolated and excluded from engaging fully with Redmont’s social and organizational activities. This loss is attributed to the biased actions of the Defendant that prevented the Plaintiff from enjoying their experience as a potential DOI member.
2. Punitive Damages:
   • The Plaintiff seeks $25,000 in punitive damages to punish the Defendant for the outrageous and biased conduct of its representative, kvogt2340, and to deter such behavior in the future. The Plaintiff claims that the Defendant’s actions—especially the threats and unjust rejection—constituted not only an injustice but a deliberate attempt to harm and undermine the Plaintiff’s standing within Redmont. This was outrageous conduct and must be penalized to maintain the integrity of the DOI application process and to ensure fair treatment for all citizens.
3. Legal Fees:
   • The Plaintiff requests $21,000 for reasonable legal fees incurred in pursuing this case.

Evidence:
P-001

By making this submission, the Plaintiff affirms understanding of the penalties for perjury and acknowledges that knowingly making false statements in court constitutes perjury.

DATED: This 19th day of January 2025

Boomsides
Representative of the Plaintiff, Bardiya_King

Proof of Representation:

 

[xtub12345]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@Freeze_Line (Attorney General) is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures , including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​