Dartanboy
Citizen
Supporter
3rd Anniversary
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
Legal Eagle
Dartanboy
Attorney
- Joined
- May 10, 2022
- Messages
- 1,442
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Dartanman
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
At some point between January 31, 2023 and March 12, 2023, our esteemed Congress voted in favor of the Super Modern Legal Board Act, yet it was never sent to the President for approval. This is an egregious Constitutional violation that must be addressed.
I. PARTIES
1. Dartanman
2. Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On January 31, 2023, bibsfi4a proposed a bill on the House floor -- the Super Modern Legal Board Act, authored by Dartanman and bibsfi4a.
2. In the House, it received an overall Aye vote, with 7 ayes and 1 nay.
3. In the Senate, it received an overall Aye vote, with 3 ayes and 1 nay.
4. The bill was never given to the President to get assent or be vetoed.
5. The bill is now marked as "rejected."
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Constitution, Part 1, Section 2, clearly states that when a bill passes through Congress it must be "sent to the President for their approval."
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Super Modern Legal Board Act be sent to the President for approval.
2. $2,500 in nominal damages, in accordance with the Legal Damages Act.
3. $250 in legal fees
Evidence
Exhibit A [Super Modern Legal Board Act]: Bill: Rejected - Super Modern Legal Board Act
Exhibit B [Constitution]: Government - Constitution
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12th day of March 2023
CIVIL ACTION
Dartanman
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
At some point between January 31, 2023 and March 12, 2023, our esteemed Congress voted in favor of the Super Modern Legal Board Act, yet it was never sent to the President for approval. This is an egregious Constitutional violation that must be addressed.
I. PARTIES
1. Dartanman
2. Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On January 31, 2023, bibsfi4a proposed a bill on the House floor -- the Super Modern Legal Board Act, authored by Dartanman and bibsfi4a.
2. In the House, it received an overall Aye vote, with 7 ayes and 1 nay.
3. In the Senate, it received an overall Aye vote, with 3 ayes and 1 nay.
4. The bill was never given to the President to get assent or be vetoed.
5. The bill is now marked as "rejected."
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Constitution, Part 1, Section 2, clearly states that when a bill passes through Congress it must be "sent to the President for their approval."
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Super Modern Legal Board Act be sent to the President for approval.
2. $2,500 in nominal damages, in accordance with the Legal Damages Act.
3. $250 in legal fees
Evidence
Exhibit A [Super Modern Legal Board Act]: Bill: Rejected - Super Modern Legal Board Act
Exhibit B [Constitution]: Government - Constitution
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12th day of March 2023