Lawsuit: Adjourned Dodrio3 v. Darkplays3656 [2023] DCR 51

Status
Not open for further replies.

dodrio3

Citizen
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
4th Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls Statesman
Dodrio3
Dodrio3
attorney
Joined
May 15, 2021
Messages
262
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dodrio3
Plaintiff

v.

Darkplays3656
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The defendant agree to a fight by stating "come on lets go" (Exhibit A) and then proceeding to do /complaint on dodrio3 despite the fight being agreed upon

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. Dodrio3 (Plaintiff)
2. Darkplays3656 (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. Darkplays3656 and Dodrio3 Agree to a fight (Exhibit A)
2. Dodrio3 Won the fight and killed Darkplays3656
3. Darkplays3656 /complaint on dodrio3 despite agreeing to the fight

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Dodrio3 unjustly has a complaint made agents him when it was agreed that a fight would take place
2. Dodrio3 was arrested for murder and fined for the false complaint

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $100 be paid for the fine that the Dodrio3 had to pay
2. $1000 in Punitive damages to prevent Darkplays3656 from doing this again
3. $1000 in humiliation damages for Dodrio3 Being arrested
4. $1000 in Loss of enjoyment is Redmont
5. $500 in compensatory damages for the work Dodrio3 was unable to complete whilst in jails
6. $720 in legal fees
7. The DOJ Clear the murder from Dodrio3 record

Exhibit A: https://medal.tv/games/minecraft/clips/1HtuXEbXEcfMl4/d1337BKbiSsW?invite=cr-MSw3WGYsMTYyNjMyNDE0LA

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 4 day of 12 2023
 
Seal_DC.png




IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@Darkplays3656 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of dodrio3 v. darkplays3656 [2023] DCR 51. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
72h have passes your Honour
 
@Darkplays3656 is hereby charged with contempt of court, the DOJ is to fine/jail them appropriately. I will summon a public defender shortly.
 
Seal_DC.png





IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@xtub12345 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of dodrio3 v. darkplays3656 [2023] DCR 51. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Dodrio3
Plaintiff

v.

Darkplays3656
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defense Affirms Fact 1
2. The Defense Affirms Fact 2
3. The Defense Affirms Fact 3

II. DEFENCES
1. The Defense has no defenses it wishes to present


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 13th day of December 2023
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The defense does not wish to drag out this case considering we have already affirmed the facts of the case to be true, we wish to not waste the courts time.

DATED: This 13th day of December 2023
 
Does the Plantiff agree to Summary Judgment?
 
The planning agrees to a summary judgment
 
I will issue a summary Judgement shortly
 

Verdict



IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT

dodrio3 v. darkplays3656 [2023] DCR 51


I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Plantiff entered a consensual fight with the Defendant
2. The Plantiff killed the Defendant in this fight
3. The Defendant use /complaint after losing said fight

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Defense Affirms all the facts

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. The Defendant did agree to combat by his expression of "Lets go, Lets Go" and their act of participating in the fight without any complaint at the time.
2. Consensual fighting is legal and there for the Plantiff should not have been arrested.

IV. DECISION
The court rules in favor of the Plantiff and grants a modified Prayer of Relief
1. The Department of Justice is ordered to fine the Defendant $500 and unfine the Plantiff the same amount
2. The Department of Justice is ordered to refund the $100 fine from the murder charge of the defendant and to remove said murder charge from the Plantiff's criminal record

The District Court thanks Dodrio3 and xtub12345 for their time.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top