Lawsuit: Pending Dr_Eksplosive v. Commonwealth of Redmont

[Goldendude15]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Dr_Eksplosive (Represented by Dragon Law firm.)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The constitutional rights and freedoms of the Plaintiff were violated by the Department of Homeland Security. At 2:53pm on the 26th of January AEDT time, the Plaintiff was arrested by police officer and DHS secretary HellsideBurnton. After being arrested, the Plaintiff’s rights and reason for arrest were not read to the Plaintiff. HellsideBurnton then transported the Plaintiff to the police station then jail where the Plaintiff spent 40 minutes imprisoned. This is a clear and evident violation of the rights of the Plaintiff. It is crucial that the DHS, the department which enforces the laws of Redmont respect the law themselves. As a result of these unlawful actions of the DHS, the Plaintiff has suffered immense stress and anxiety because of how the DHS blatantly violated their core rights as a person.
I. Parties

1. Dr_Eksplosive (Plaintiff.)
2. HellsideBurnton (Agent of the Defendant.)
3. Department of Homeland Security (Defendant.)

II. Facts

1. Dr_Eksplosive was present at spawn engaging in conversation with fellow citizens. (P-001.)
2. At 2:53pm on the 26th of January AEDT time, Dr_Eksplosive was arrested at spawn by the Secretary of Homeland Security HellsideBurnton. (P-002.)
3. Immediately after being arrested, the Plaintiff was moved to the police station then Revcatraz and was given 40 minutes of jail time and fined $600. (P-003)
4. At no point during or after the arrest was the Plaintiff informed of the nature or cause of the accusation against them nor advised of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent or that anything said could be used as evidence against them.

III. Claims for Relief

1. Part 4 of the constitution, rights and freedoms outlines in right IX that “any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judicial Officer, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted with the evidence against them, and to have the assistance of legally qualified counsel for their defense.” In this case, the Plaintiff was not informed of the nature and cause of the accusation. HellsideBurnton, the arresting officer, simply locked away the Plaintiff without giving any information about why they were being arrested, a clear violation of the fundamental right aforementioned.
2. The law further sets out in the Miranda Warning Act that “every citizen charged with an offense must: a. be informed, without unreasonable delay, of the specific offense. b. be advised, without unreasonable delay, that they have a right to remain silent and that any statement they do make may be used as evidence against them.” Evidently in this case the plaintiff was not informed of the specific offense nor advised of their right to remain silent and the fact that anything they say can be used as evidence in court. By not reading the Plaintiff the Miranda rights, the DHS has clearly violated the law and the core rights of the plaintiff.
3. In accordance with §4-2(c) of the Standardized Criminal Code Act, “If an individual is found to be not guilty of a crime after punishment has been imposed, they shall be compensated $50 per minute spent in jail for offenses found unproven, alongside a reimbursement of any fine paid for unproven offenses.” The Plaintiff's arrest and subsequent 40-minute imprisonment were unlawful, as no valid charges were presented or proven.

IV. Prayers for Relief

1. Punitive damages: $100,000: The Plaintiff seeks $100,000 from the Department of Homeland Security to discourage and prevent the DHS from committing the outrageous conduct of violating the constitutional rights of the citizens of Redmont under which they serve. The court must ensure such a gross miscarriage of justice never occurs again.
2. Consequential Damages: $70,000: The Plaintiff seeks $70,000 from the DHS as emotional damages. This amount is justified to address the emotional stress and severe anxiety inflicted upon the Plaintiff as a direct consequence of the violation of their enshrined rights and freedoms. It accounts for the distress and confusion experienced by the Plaintiff, stemming from the unjust arrest procedure applied by the DHS and how the Plaintiff had no way of knowing why they were being imprisoned.
3. Civil damages: $2,600: The plaintiff seeks $2,600 in civil damages as compensation for the 40 minutes spent in jail under §4-2(c) of the Standardized Criminal Code Act and a reimbursement for the fine of $600 under §4-2(c) of the aforementioned law.
4. Legal fees: $51,780: The Plaintiff seeks $51,780 to account for the legal services of Dragon Law firm at the 30% of case value cap.

V. Evidence

Spoiler: P-001

P-001

Spoiler: P-002

P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: Proof of representation

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 30th day of January 2025.