Lawsuit: Dismissed Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. CopTop_YT, lawanoespr, Alexthelillion [2024] FCR 85

Status
Not open for further replies.

Towloo

Citizen
Representative
Homeland Security Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Oakridge Resident
Statesman Popular in the Polls 4th Anniversary Change Maker
Towloo
Towloo
representative
Joined
Nov 22, 2023
Messages
360
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto
Plaintiffs


V


CopTop_YT, lawanoespr, Alexthelillion
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The plaintiff complains against the defendants as follows:

Throughout multiple instances, the defendants have harassed the plaintiffs and caused many damages through no fault of my clients (P-002 + Witness testimonies). In particular, they have forced the plaintiffs to close their business, live in constant fear of being shot, and have prevented them from going about their daily lives. The defendants have achieved such a punitive feat by constantly showing up towards my clients’ lawful shop and shooting towards them. The plaintiffs have no other option other than to close all the doors, preventing any business that would have come. A defendant, Alexthelillion, even stated, “if anyone goes near your store ill kill em,” further preventing business due to the fear instilled that would prevent anyone from going, and the actual threat being carried out (P-001).

I. PARTIES
1) Dragonfly0001 (Plaintiff)

2) Brustklefurry (Plaintiff)

3) YourLocalDiabeto (Plaintiff)

4) CopTop_YT (Defendant)

5) lawanoespr (Defendant)

6) Alexthelillion (Defendant)

7) _A_S_H_E_R (Witness)

8) LandoPlayzo (Witness)

II. FACTS
1) The defendants have constantly harassed the plaintiffs

2) The defendants’ harassment caused the plaintiffs’ closing shop

3) The plaintiffs had to live in constant fear of being shot due to the harassment

4) The plaintiffs were prevented from going about their daily lives

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1) The definition of Compensatory Damages as per the Legal Damages Act is, “ ‘Compensatory damages’ are the damages awarded to a person as compensation; security or protection against a loss or other financial burden.” The defendants have imposed a great financial burden upon my clients as their business has been prevented from being open due to the constant threat of another attack, as well as the threat made by defendant Alexthelillion

2) The definition of Emotional Damages as per the Legal Damages Act is, “Situations in which a person suffers psychological harm due to an entity's negligent or intentional actions.” The plaintiffs have certainly suffered psychological harm due to their having to live in constant fear of dying (this is very mentally straining) as well as having to physically fight against the defendants’ actions.

3) The definition of Loss of Enjoyment as per the Legal Damages Act is, “situations in which an injured party loses their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm.” My clients were completely able to sell their products and go about their daily lives before the harassment, but afterwards, they were having to defend their property against the defendants and live in fear that another attack would come, preventing them from performing daily operations.

4) The definition of Punitive Damages as per the Legal Damages Act is, “‘Punitive damages’ are damages awarded against a person to punish them for their outrageous conduct and to deter them and others like them from similar conduct in the future.” Attempting and successfully trying to kill multiple people multiple times across multiple incidents is certainly outrageous conduct. This court must award these punitive damages because if they’re not awarded, the defendants will continue with their outrageous behavior and most likely harass more innocent Redmont citizens.

IV. PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
1) $10,000 in compensatory damages for the lost business
2) $15,000 in emotional damages
3) $15,000 in loss of enjoyment
4) $20,000 in punitive damages
5) $18,000 in legal fees

V. EVIDENCE

Screen Shot 2024-06-06 at 12.31.27 PM.png


Screen Shot 2024-06-06 at 11.22.15 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-06 at 12.33.47 PM.png
 
Seal_Judiciary.png


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@CopTop, @lawanoesepr and @Alexthelillion are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. CopTop_YT, lawanoespr, Alexthelillion. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Should all parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures , including the option of an in-game trial should all parties request one.

Should any of the parties not agree to having the same attorney, this case will be split up into separate cases. Please indicate this before filing an answer to the complaint.
 
I am present, I request 48 hours for my legal team to prepare a Response to Complaint.
 
I am present, I request 48 hours for my legal team to prepare a Response to Complaint.
Do @CopTop and @Alexthelillion share the same legal counsel as yourself? If so, please provide proof.
 
Very Well, I will be dismissing this case without prejudice due to the defendants not sharing the same legal counsel. I advise the plaintiffs to refile, naming only one defendant in each filing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top