lawanoesepr
Citizen
Justice Department
Construction & Transport Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
3rd Anniversary
2nd Anniversary
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
lawanoesepr
donator1
- Joined
- May 8, 2021
- Messages
- 686
- Thread Author
- #1
- Client Name: The Commonwealth of redmont
- Counsel Name: Office of The Attorney General
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff/ Prosecution
- Reason for the Appeal:
In the verdict, Judge nnmc found Franktabasco guilty of one count of mass animal murder, but not two because he claims that more than 50 only constitutes one charge. He is correct, but these murders have been committed separately, and according to the Mass Animal Murder Act Amendment, the charges are separate if they didn't happen at the same time Therefore, the court should have charged Franktobasco with two charges of mass animal murder.
- Additional Information:
- Counsel Name: Office of The Attorney General
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff/ Prosecution
- Reason for the Appeal:
In the verdict, Judge nnmc found Franktabasco guilty of one count of mass animal murder, but not two because he claims that more than 50 only constitutes one charge. He is correct, but these murders have been committed separately, and according to the Mass Animal Murder Act Amendment, the charges are separate if they didn't happen at the same time Therefore, the court should have charged Franktobasco with two charges of mass animal murder.
- Additional Information: