Appeal: Accepted FCR 36 - Appeal Request - [2023] SCR 12

[Dartanboy]

Client Name:
Dartanman

Counsel Name:
Dartanman

Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant:
Plaintiff

Reason for the Appeal:
The verdict displays ignorance of the Constitution. The Court Opinion doesn't even have any opinion. It doesn't touch on the law at all. It doesn't seek to clarify anything. It is almost verbatim "It doesn't violate your rights, because it doesn't."

Regardless, I think it is very clear that the DoS has violated my rights, and wish to focus now on just one of this verdict:

"It doesn't violate the concept of everyone being equal before and under the law because these restrictions apply to everyone."

Your honors, I feel like this is the worst part of this entire verdict. Restrictions merely applying to everyone does not make for equality. For example, having a law that says, "You must have $15,000 in order to go to this part of town" applies to everyone - everyone must have $15,000 in order to go to this part of town, however this is discriminating against people with less than $15,000 based on socioeconomic status (social status).

Similarly, this point of the Court Opinion is fundamentally flawed, in that denying party registration because it isn't popular enough (not enough people support it) is denying party registration based no social status, which is unconstitutional.

Additional Information:
Original Case Link: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 36

 

[Nacho]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The court has granted this appeal on the basis of equal protection under the law with regard to department policy.

Please re-file your appealed case in the Supreme Court sub-forum at your earliest convenience. Please have this done within the next 48 hours if you wish to continue with the process.​