HugeBob
Citizen
Former President
Supporter
President
Presidential Commendation
hugebob23456
donator3
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2020
- Messages
- 656
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
hugebob23456
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
What is election fraud? Would a state sponsored televised debate open to all candidates which conveniently disinvites certain candidates constitute election fraud? What it be unreasonable to believe that such an event, especially one announced in #government-announcements and pinging @politics, would have a significant impact on the outcome of the election? I fully understand why some campaigns are not taken seriously. My campaign is not seeking to seriously win the Presidency, however this is a matter of establishing precedent and protecting the rights ordained in the Constitution. A future President with malicious intent could cite this debate as precedent to allow them to strategically deny unfavorable candidates access to Government sponsored debates. This threatens the very foundation of our democracy. We must guarantee that all lawful candidates are given an equal opportunity to seek elected office, no matter what. We cannot allow people who hold political affiliations to arbitrarily decide who is a "joke candidate" and who is "legitimate". All candidates, whether they be ICP, BDP, Independent, or even a "protest candidate" should, so long as they are legally eligible to contest the election, be given access to the same mechanisms provided by the State. That simple concept has been breached on this day, and we seek retribution not only for the damage done to our campaigns, but to protect the next generation of politicians from the same type of abuse.
I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth
2. hugebob23456
3. Krix
4. LilNickiVert
5. LilDigiVert
II. FACTS
1. Candidate hugebob23456 declared candidacy to contest the February Presidential Election and is legally permitted to contest this election.
2. Candidate LilNickiVert declared candidacy to contest the February Presidential Election and is legally permitted to contest this election.
3. Candidate Westray and Bestray declared their candidacies and were permitted to participate in the debate.
4. As evident by their username, candidate Bestray is sympathetic to the Westray campaign.
5. Both candidates hugebob23456 and LilNickiVert have a longer, more established political history than at least one of the candidates which were permitted to debate.
6. The incumbent DPA Secretary was aware of the candidacy of these other campaigns and was notified of this problem via pings in Discord.
7. The Constitution grants the following right: "XIII. Every citizen is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without unfair discrimination and, in particular, without unfair discrimination based on political belief or social status." and we believe that both of the parties excluded from this debate have been unfairly discriminated against in accordance with this expressly enumerated right.
8. The Constitution grants the following right: "I. The right to participate in, and run for elected office, unless as punishment for a crime." and, while the candidates are not being barred from contesting the election, their right to participate in the election is certainly being limited to a degree that other candidates are not being subject to, and not as punishment for any crime which either candidate has been formally charged with.
9. Corruption is defined as: "To use a government position, elected or otherwise, to benefit one's private interests or corporate ventures. By applying for a position or being elected into a position in government, the player agrees to serve the server over themselves." and we believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest that these actions have the express motive of ensuring the victory of the Westray campaign in the upcoming election.
10. Election Fraud is defined as: "Any player caught rigging/meddling with an election through, but not limited to: the use of alternate accounts, bribery, and or threats." and we believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest that these discriminatory actions are politically motivated, with the goal to ultimately influence the result of the election.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The DPA Secretary has unlawfully kept lawful candidates from participating in a Government sanctioned debate event.
2. The President took no action to correct the DPA Secretary's unlawful action.
3. The results of the Presidential Election cannot be legitimate due to the significant amount of election interference conducted by the incumbent administration.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The incumbent DPA Secretary be removed from office and barred from serving in public office for the maximum allowable 2 month period.
2. The incumbent President be removed from office and barred from serving in public office for the maximum allowable 2 month period.
3. The upcoming Presidential Election be cancelled.
4. A total of $10,000 made payable to hugebob23456 for damage to their reputation and political campaign.
4. A total of $10,000 made payable to LilNickiVert for damage to their reputation and political campaign.
V. EVIDENCE
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
VI. INJUNCTION REQUEST
Because of the nature of this lawsuit, we would like to request an emergency injunction to prevent the February Presidential Election from taking place pending the completion of this lawsuit.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 6th day of February 2022
CIVIL ACTION
hugebob23456
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
What is election fraud? Would a state sponsored televised debate open to all candidates which conveniently disinvites certain candidates constitute election fraud? What it be unreasonable to believe that such an event, especially one announced in #government-announcements and pinging @politics, would have a significant impact on the outcome of the election? I fully understand why some campaigns are not taken seriously. My campaign is not seeking to seriously win the Presidency, however this is a matter of establishing precedent and protecting the rights ordained in the Constitution. A future President with malicious intent could cite this debate as precedent to allow them to strategically deny unfavorable candidates access to Government sponsored debates. This threatens the very foundation of our democracy. We must guarantee that all lawful candidates are given an equal opportunity to seek elected office, no matter what. We cannot allow people who hold political affiliations to arbitrarily decide who is a "joke candidate" and who is "legitimate". All candidates, whether they be ICP, BDP, Independent, or even a "protest candidate" should, so long as they are legally eligible to contest the election, be given access to the same mechanisms provided by the State. That simple concept has been breached on this day, and we seek retribution not only for the damage done to our campaigns, but to protect the next generation of politicians from the same type of abuse.
I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth
2. hugebob23456
3. Krix
4. LilNickiVert
5. LilDigiVert
II. FACTS
1. Candidate hugebob23456 declared candidacy to contest the February Presidential Election and is legally permitted to contest this election.
2. Candidate LilNickiVert declared candidacy to contest the February Presidential Election and is legally permitted to contest this election.
3. Candidate Westray and Bestray declared their candidacies and were permitted to participate in the debate.
4. As evident by their username, candidate Bestray is sympathetic to the Westray campaign.
5. Both candidates hugebob23456 and LilNickiVert have a longer, more established political history than at least one of the candidates which were permitted to debate.
6. The incumbent DPA Secretary was aware of the candidacy of these other campaigns and was notified of this problem via pings in Discord.
7. The Constitution grants the following right: "XIII. Every citizen is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without unfair discrimination and, in particular, without unfair discrimination based on political belief or social status." and we believe that both of the parties excluded from this debate have been unfairly discriminated against in accordance with this expressly enumerated right.
8. The Constitution grants the following right: "I. The right to participate in, and run for elected office, unless as punishment for a crime." and, while the candidates are not being barred from contesting the election, their right to participate in the election is certainly being limited to a degree that other candidates are not being subject to, and not as punishment for any crime which either candidate has been formally charged with.
9. Corruption is defined as: "To use a government position, elected or otherwise, to benefit one's private interests or corporate ventures. By applying for a position or being elected into a position in government, the player agrees to serve the server over themselves." and we believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest that these actions have the express motive of ensuring the victory of the Westray campaign in the upcoming election.
10. Election Fraud is defined as: "Any player caught rigging/meddling with an election through, but not limited to: the use of alternate accounts, bribery, and or threats." and we believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest that these discriminatory actions are politically motivated, with the goal to ultimately influence the result of the election.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The DPA Secretary has unlawfully kept lawful candidates from participating in a Government sanctioned debate event.
2. The President took no action to correct the DPA Secretary's unlawful action.
3. The results of the Presidential Election cannot be legitimate due to the significant amount of election interference conducted by the incumbent administration.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The incumbent DPA Secretary be removed from office and barred from serving in public office for the maximum allowable 2 month period.
2. The incumbent President be removed from office and barred from serving in public office for the maximum allowable 2 month period.
3. The upcoming Presidential Election be cancelled.
4. A total of $10,000 made payable to hugebob23456 for damage to their reputation and political campaign.
4. A total of $10,000 made payable to LilNickiVert for damage to their reputation and political campaign.
V. EVIDENCE
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
VI. INJUNCTION REQUEST
Because of the nature of this lawsuit, we would like to request an emergency injunction to prevent the February Presidential Election from taking place pending the completion of this lawsuit.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 6th day of February 2022
Last edited: