Lawsuit: Adjourned IShowed_Up v. Michealson [2024] DCR 35

[ilovemyself_64818]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff
IShowed_Up (Represented by solid law firm
v.

Michealson
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On 11th augest 2024 , my client was murdered multiple times by Michealson This is bad, however soon after the first murder Michealson started repeatedly harassing and murdering my client multiple times over the course of a few hours without end. My client was Humiliated and belittled by the blasphemous actions of michealson . On top of these heinous deeds my client experienced extreme psychological and emotional damage from the continuous murders. These unwarranted killings also prevented IShowed_Up from engaging in any business or normal activities.


PARTIES
1. IShowed_Up ( plaintiff )
2.Michealson (Defendant)


II. FACTS
1. On Augest 11th 2024 The Plaintiff was murdered and harassed multiple times by Michealson .
2. This constant harassment severely damaged IShowed_Up's emotional framework and his psychological health in general.

III. CLAIMS FOR Relief
1. After multiple hours of being prevented from doing anything normal my client clearly suffered severe emotional and psychological damage.
2. Under the legal damages act emotional damage is when “ Situations in which a person suffers psychological harm due to an entity's negligence or intentional actions.” Michealson intentionally murdered and harassed my client repeatedly, and as a result of that IShowed_Up suffered intense psychological harm.
3. The act of being repeatedly murder causes huge disgrace and shame, and these repeated murders were directed towards my client. IShowed_Up was made to look weak and foolish under Michealson's Power
4. Under the legal damages act humiliation is when “a person has been disgraced, belittled or made to look foolish.” Understandably being murdered multiple times is certainly a disgrace, and my client was also meant to look weak and defenseless because of being murdered multiple times.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $10000 to be rewarded to the plaintiff in emotional damages
2. $10000 in punitive damages(To deter heinous acts such as these in the future)
3. 20 percent of case value hence
$4000 in legal fees


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: Augest,20th 2024

 

[Jakovus]

Your honour,
As the CEO of Solid Law Firm, this case never received my approval to go to Court and the lead counsel is in the process of being fired. Solid Law Firm is not representing this client.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your honour,
I am no longer associated with solid law firm
However after the consulation with the plaintiff
the plaintiff has agreed to let me represent him in my personal capacity as a barrister

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Proof of consent to represent is attached above

 

[KingBOB99878]

Your Honour
I am KingBOB99878 I did not let me change my username on Democracy craft am I am a witness please check photo
five I tried to sue but I did not have discord please ask IshowedUp and he will tell you that I am a witness

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Still awaiting the case to start

 

[Anthony]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@Michaelson is required to appear before the District Court in the case of IShowed_Up v. Michealson [2024] DCR 35. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honor,
The defendant has failed to testify within the 72 hour period
I request you to issue a default judgement based on the known facts of the case

 

[Anthony]

The defendant has failed to appear to the summons issued by the court and the defendant is held in contempt of court. The Dept Homeland Security is ordered to fine/jail accordingly. I will be assigning a public defender.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honor,
no public defender has been assigned yet
Pls look into it and assign one

 

[Anthony]

Your Honor,
no public defender has been assigned yet
Pls look into it and assign one

Please have patience. A public defender has to accept it, it takes time.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Alright I shall keep patience
thank you for your effort

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
it has been 72 hours and no public defender has been assigned.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your honour,
5 days have elapsed and no public defender has been appointed
This is a violation of the plaintiff's IX right
I request the court to contact the PDD and ask them to accelarate the appointment of public defender

 

[Anthony]

Your honour,
5 days have elapsed and no public defender has been appointed
This is a violation of the plaintiff's IX right
I request the court to contact the PDD and ask them to accelarate the appointment of public defender

There is only one public defender. who is also the public defender director, who is assigned to the case.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
The assigned public defender has still not delivered an answer to the complaint.
I request you to direct the Public defender to issue one within 48 houes

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Please direct the public defender to send a answer to complaint within 48 hours
it has been 6 days

 

[ko531]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT


Ishowed_up
Plaintiff

v.

Michealson
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defense Affirms On Augest 11th 2024 The Plaintiff was murdered but Denies that they were harassed multiple times by Michealson.

2. The Defense Denies that yhis constant harassment severely damaged IShowed_Up's emotional framework and his psychological health in general.


II. Defense

It is clear from the evidence that the Plaintiff was murdered quite a few times. Murder is illegal and there is remedy for this already with /complaint. The Plaintiff fails to show in there evidence or state whether or not they did this. What is evident by the provided screenshots is that these murdered happened near michealson's property as shown by the ability to place down ishowed_up's head. This property is in the residential area and near nothing of necessity meaning ishowed_up purposely went there.

Because they purposely went there even though they were getting killed by this person means they were most likely looking for confrontation. They knew this person was violent and killing them yet they still went to their property. THey could have easily avoided this by leaving Michealson alone. The murder may have been illegal and if so /complaint should have been used. But because ishowed_up kept going to this person's property after getting killed multiple times already in a way prolonged and caused their own damages and therefore they can not seek compensation.


(I apologize to the court for the delay, it is the first week of college for me)

 

[Anthony]

We will be moving onto discovery. Discovery will end in 3 days.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

The Plaintiff motions to end discovery early

 

[Anthony]

Does the defendant agree?

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
3 days have elapsed

 

[Anthony]

We will now move onto opening statements, the plaintiff has 72 hours to do so.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
I had went to conference today and have lost my laptop so i request a 48 hour extenstion to give my opening statement

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

OPENING STATEMENT
Your Honour,

Our case is quite straightforward and simple to understand. My client was first murdered by Michealson near his property, an act that caused immediate harm and distress. However, the situation escalated shortly after the first murder when Michealson continued to repeatedly murder and harass my client. These actions persisted over the course of several hours, creating a pattern of targeted aggression. During this time, my client was not only physically Murdered but also humiliated in front of everyone present. This public humiliation further deepened the emotional toll on my client.
As a result of Michealson’s heinous actions, my client suffered significant psychological damage, which left him unable to engage in any normal business activities for the duration of those few hours. The repeated nature of these attacks undermined my client’s confidence and sense of security. Michealson’s actions were not just about murder; they were calculated moves meant to make my client appear weak and powerless in the eyes of others.
The constant cycle of murders and ongoing harassment inflicted by Michealson severely damaged my client’s ability to carry out his usual business activities, effectively paralyzing his efforts to participate in Activities . This continued abuse prevented my client from returning to a normal state of affairs, thereby causing long-lasting consequences that affected not only his emotional well-being but also his standing within the environment.

ON THE DEFENSES CLAIMS
The defense’s claims are completely baseless. The defense argues that there is no evidence Michealson himself committed the murder. This is false, as the screenshots provided clearly show the system message in the chat: “You have been murdered by Michealson.” This message appears in all the screenshots, which directly contradicts the defense's claim.

Secondly, the defense's argument that the area was residential and there was nothing of necessity there is also false. My client was hired by KingBOB99878 to be his bodyguard, and the house Michealson was at was on the way to KingBOB99878’s house. Therefore, my client had no choice but to pass through the area to fulfill his duties. KingBOB99878 was under attack, so my client had to protect him. To do so, he needed to reach KingBOB’s house, and near Michealson’s house was a bus stop, making it impossible for my client to avoid that path.

Michealson repeatedly killed my client when he was simply trying to get to KingBOB’s house. Your Honour, my client was not seeking confrontation; he was only attempting to carry out his responsibilities as a bodyguard and reach KingBOB’s house.

 

[Anthony]

The defense has 72 hours to file their opening statement.

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
In light of some new information being known to me we would like to call
KingBOB99878 as a witness

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
The time period for response has expired
I request you to move ahead with the legal process

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
I request that we move forward with the legal process

 

[furiouspaladin]

I like to request a Diherea order wich each defendent and plaintiff shit there pants on live to reveal the truth

 

[Anthony]

Struck from the court, I will ask you do not make another statement in this court.

I like to request a Diherea order wich each defendent and plaintiff shit there pants on live to reveal the truth

 

[Anthony]

The plaintiff has 72 hours to post a closing statement.

does the defense agree to a summary judgment?

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
I reiterate what i said in my opening

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Can we move ahead

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Its been 3 days can we please proceed

 

[Anthony]

The defendant has 72 hours to post a closing statement.

 

[furiouspaladin]

hehehehe

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

The defendant has 72 hours to post a closing statement.

Your Honour,
It has been 3 days and the defendant hasnt posted a closing statement

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Can we proceed please

 

[Anthony]

This court is in recess pending a verdict

 

[furiouspaladin]

I hate myself

 

[BlestSnow636130]

Something

 

[BlestSnow636130]

Sorry to court
i was dming someone else mistakenly typed here

 

[ilovemyself_64818]

Your Honour,
Its been 11 days when can we expect a verdict?

 

[Anthony]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
IShowed_Up v. Michealson [2024] DCR 35

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. After multiple hours of being prevented from doing anything normal my client clearly suffered severe emotional and psychological damage.
2. Under the legal damages act emotional damage is when “ Situations in which a person suffers psychological harm due to an entity's negligence or intentional actions.” Michealson intentionally murdered and harassed my client repeatedly, and as a result of that IShowed_Up suffered intense psychological harm.
3. The act of being repeatedly murder causes huge disgrace and shame, and these repeated murders were directed towards my client. IShowed_Up was made to look weak and foolish under Michealson's Power
4. Under the legal damages act humiliation is when “a person has been disgraced, belittled or made to look foolish.” Understandably being murdered multiple times is certainly a disgrace, and my client was also meant to look weak and defenseless because of being murdered multiple times.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. these murdered happened near michealson's property as shown by the ability to place down ishowed_up's head. This property is in the residential area and near nothing of necessity meaning ishowed_up purposely went there.

2. Because they purposely went there even though they were getting killed by this person means they were most likely looking for confrontation. They knew this person was violent and killing them yet they still went to their property. THey could have easily avoided this by leaving Michealson alone. The murder may have been illegal and if so /complaint should have been used. But because ishowed_up kept going to this person's property after getting killed multiple times already in a way prolonged and caused their own damages and therefore they can not seek compensation.

III. THE COURT OPINION
Firstly, Murder is illegal yes, but there is a few things that the plaintiff has not shown.

1. The plaintiff claims "Michealson started repeatedly harassing and murdering my client multiple times over the course of a few hours without end." The plaintiff has not shown any evidence of the course of a "few hours without end" as the plaintiff states.
2. Since the defendant has murdered, the plaintiff has the option to do /complaint as the message shows in the evidence, and the defendant will be punished by the Dept. Homeland Security.
3. The Legal Damages Act states "Humiliation damages may be proven by witness testimony and reasonable person tests, or any other mechanism the presiding Judge considers persuasive." There has been no witness testimony to show that there was any Humiliation. during this case.


IV. DECISION
The District Court rules in favor of the Defendant.

The District Court thanks all involved.