- Joined
- Jan 23, 2025
- Messages
- 6
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
lcn (Represented by Dragon Law)
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On the 7th of March of 2025, at 19h47 EST lcn, the Plaintiff, requested to be let go from their employment at the Department of Homeland Security, to which Secretary Intercepticon answered with an offer of becoming an Honorary Detective, a counteroffer that the Plaintiff declined.
At 1h10 EST on the 14th of March of 2025, the Plaintiff requested to be let go from their position for a second time. The request was denied by Secretary Intercepticon at 3h59 EST with the statement of “NO! You stay”. At 16h27 EST, Senate President CaseyLeFaye quoted §4(2) of the Miscellaneous Offenses Act that describes the crime of Enslavement, to which Dep. Secretary Real42 responded with three nerd emojis, seemingly mocking Senate President CaseyLeFaye’s mentioning of the criminal nature of their refusal. After consulting with legal counsel, the Plaintiff was advised to submit a criminal complaint to the DOJ, which they did the 26th of March, at 23h56 EST, to which Attorney General Freeze_Line answered “You must stay” at 2h32 EST of the next day, echoing Secretary Intercepticon’s second refusal, without requesting any more information. At 13h11 EST, Attorney General Freeze_Line requested to close the ticket, with the reason stated as “You must stay”.
I. PARTIES
1. lcn
2. Secretary Intercepticon
3. Attorney General Freeze_Line
4. Deputy Secretary Real42
II. FACTS
1. The Plaintiff was prevented from leaving their job at the Department of Homeland Security by Homeland Security Secretary Intercepticon, which constitutes Enslavement.
2. Attorney General Freeze_Line refused to prosecute enslavement, with Attorney General Freeze_Line stating “You must stay” when this fact was brought to the DOJ, refusing to prosecute. They didn’t request any further information when the ticket was brought to them, simply affirming the actions of Secretary Intercepticon.
3. Deputy Secretary Real42 acknowledged that the refusal to release the Plaintiff from their employment constituted Enslavement under the Miscellaneous Offenses Act and mocked Senate President CaseyLeFaye for citing the relevant statute.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff was in involuntary servitude by the Department of Homeland Security by refusing to terminate their employment, violating §4(2) of the Miscellaneous Offenses Act.
2. Officials of the Department of Homeland Security openly mocked the citing of the relevant legal statute, and by doing so acknowledged the criminality of the retention of the Plaintiff as an employee.
3. The Department of Justice refused to prosecute a criminal complaint, as is their duty under §8(1)(b) of the Executive Standards Act.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. As Injunctive Relief: A court order requiring the Defendant to relieve the Plaintiff from her Department of Homeland Security employment.
2. $30,000 in Punitive Damages from the Commonwealth - For the outrageous conduct from Homeland Security Secretary Intercepticon for refusing to terminate the Plaintiff's employment and engaging in Enslavement.
3. $30,000 in Punitive Damages from the Commonwealth - For the outrageous act of the Department of Justice of refusing to prosecute without even asking for further information, and affirming the “necessity” of the forced continuous employment, twice.
4. $10,000 in Consequential Damages from the Commonwealth - For the overall refusal to allow the Plaintiff to freely enjoy their time in Redmont instead of seeking to restore their ability to leave employment with the Commonwealth by their own free will, as this constitutes Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont.
5. $21,000 in Legal Fees for the time and effort of Dragon Law firm, per the Legal Damages Act.
V. EVIDENCE
Witness List:
CaseyLeFaye
roryyy___
Proof of representation:
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 26th day of March 2025
Last edited: