Lawsuit: Dismissed .Lucky_waq v. YourChillGamer [2025] FCR 15

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

AmityBlamity

Citizen
Aventura Resident
AmityBlamity
AmityBlamity
Attorney
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
30

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

.Lucky_waq
Plaintiff
(Represented by AmityBlamity)

v.

YourChillGamer
Defendant

COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On February 8th, 2025, around 22:40 CET, my client was attempting to sell a Superior AA-Grade Amethyst Ring, having been fortunate enough to obtain this valuable item. Uncertain of the item’s value, they sought the advice of veteran player Homelander to obtain an accurate valuation. Perhaps sensing my client’s naivety, the Defendant made a seemingly genuine offer to purchase the item, with the two eventually agreeing on the sum of $4,500 (as shown in P-001).

Wisely, my client demanded that the Defendant hand over the money first. However, the Defendant outrageously attempted to paint my client as untrustworthy, demanding the ring first while uttering “i dont trust you” (see P-002).

My client, seeking to allay any concerns of trust, agreed to hand over the ring. Upon doing so, the Defendant proceeded to mock and humiliate my client before logging off without paying (as shown in P-003).

Your Honor, this is an open and shut case. A prime example of a disgusting scammer who not only thinks themselves above the law of the server, but also saw fit to insult my client. The Defendant took advantage of my client’s kind, trusting nature, and proceeded to exploit it for financial gain. I humbly request that this court use the power vested within the judiciary to amend the situation and make my client whole.


I. PARTIES

1. .Lucky_waq (Plaintiff)
2. YourChillGamer (Defendant)


II. FACTS

1. The Plaintiff was looking to sell a Superior AA-Grade Amethyst Ring in exchange for money.
2. The Defendant agreed to purchase the Ring for $4,500.
3. Upon receiving the ring, the Defendant mocked the Plaintiff in a disgusting act of humiliation, and then proceeded to log off, scamming the Plaintiff.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Punitive Damages: The Defendant engaged in intentional and malicious actions, and thus should be punished with punitive damages to hold them accountable.

2. Loss of Enjoyment: The plaintiff’s enjoyment of DemocracyCraft has been significantly hampered by the Defendant’s actions.

3. Humiliation: The Defendant not only scammed the plaintiff, but also saw fit to laugh at and mock the plaintiff.

4. Legal Fees: In order to pay the attorney for their time and effort spent on the case.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

Punitive Damages - The plaintiff seeks $25,000 for the Defendant’s malicious and intentional actions, as a means to punish the Defendant for their behavior and to deter them from engaging in similar conduct in the future.

Loss of Enjoyment - The plaintiff seeks $25,000 for the loss of enjoyment as a direct result of the Defendant’s actions. I think you will agree that getting scammed will dampen the amount of enjoyment you’ll find on the server.

Humiliation - The plaintiff seeks $25,000 for the unprompted, unjust, and downright hurtful humiliation caused by the Defendant’s actions. It was bad enough the Defendant decided to scam my client, but they also felt it necessary to rub it in their face.

Legal Fees - The plaintiff seeks 30% of the case value to compensate for the legal fees incurred.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Signed,
AmityBlamity


DATED: This 8 day of February 2025

 

Attachments

  • p-001.png
    p-001.png
    830.7 KB · Views: 40
  • p-002.png
    p-002.png
    823.2 KB · Views: 39
  • p-003.png
    p-003.png
    812.8 KB · Views: 33
  • proof-of-representation.png
    proof-of-representation.png
    64.3 KB · Views: 34
Last edited:

Writ of Summons


YourChillGamer is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of .lucky_waq v YourChillGamer [2025] FCR 15.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
YourChillGamer has failed to appear before the court. I hereby find them in Contempt of Court and order the Department of Homeland Security to fine and/or jail them appropriately.

I will be appointing a Public Defender as, by my discretion, this player seems to be completely oblivious to the legal processes of Redmont.
 
I am present on behalf of the PD Programm
 
I hereby find the Public Defender Program in Contempt of Court for failing to provide a filing by the deadline. As this is their first offense, I order a $500 fine.

As the Defendant is still entitled to legal counsel, we will  not have Summary Judgement, however the PD Program will be charged with Contempt every 24 hours until there is a filing.
 
ANSWER TO CIVIL ACTION

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

(.Lucky_waq)
Plaintiff

v.

(YourChillGamer)
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defence affirms all.

II. DEFENCES
1. The Defence wishes to call JediAJMan
2. The Defence wishes to state that the Defendant returned the Ring they had bad WiFi and could get back.

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This (16) day of (Febuary) (2025)
 
We will now enter a 72-hour period of Discovery. It may be extended if necessary or cut short by both parties agreeing.
 
I move to submit p-004, p-005, p-006, p-007, and p-008 into evidence.

Furthermore Your Honor, I wish to amend the Complaint to remove the Breach of Contract from the Claims for Relief/Prayer for Relief.
 

Attachments

  • p-004(v2).png
    p-004(v2).png
    120.3 KB · Views: 23
  • p-005.png
    p-005.png
    86.8 KB · Views: 25
  • p-006.png
    p-006.png
    90.5 KB · Views: 25
  • p-007.png
    p-007.png
    199.4 KB · Views: 21
  • p-008.png
    p-008.png
    242.9 KB · Views: 22
AmityBlamity said:
Furthermore Your Honor, I wish to amend the Complaint to remove the Breach of Contract from the Claims for Relief/Prayer for Relief.
Click to expand...
You may
 
Babysoga4real said:
ANSWER TO CIVIL ACTION

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

(.Lucky_waq)
Plaintiff

v.

(YourChillGamer)
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defence affirms all.

II. DEFENCES
1. The Defence wishes to call JediAJMan
2. The Defence wishes to state that the Defendant returned the Ring they had bad WiFi and could get back.

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This (16) day of (Febuary) (2025)
Click to expand...

Your honor,

Per Court rules and procedures 3.4 (Amendment to Answer) I am amending the defense's answer to the complaint as follows in response to discovery by the plaintiff. Because the previous answer was posted by another lawyer I opted to re-post it in its entirety with the changes made.

I also opted to utilize the required formatting to re-present this answer, as such I hope that is not an issue for the court.

Thank you.

Answer to Complaint


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

.lucky_waq
Plaintiff

v.

YourChillGamer
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The defence AFFIRMS this fact.
2. The defence AFFIRMS this fact.
3. The defence AFFIRMS that the defendant had mocked the plaintiff, but DENIES the plaintiff was scammed.

II. DEFENCES
1. With the ring in the plaintiff's possession, the idea that a scam took place is ridiculous.
2. The plaintiff was offered $1,000 on a payment plan, and upon assumptions made about the defendants balance, seemingly chose to deny this generous offer.
3. The plaintiff ring in one hand, and the choice to not have $1,000 in the other is pushing this frivolous case forward to receive money they were never entitled to in the first place.
4. On a balance of probabilities, the plaintiff likely was not humiliated or lost enjoyment as the result of a single-item setback, of which they received back later.
5. The defendant made no money or profit as a result of this alleged 'scam', the ring was returned to its owner.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 16th day of February 2025

 
Your Honor,

I'm pleased to announce that both parties have agreed on an out of court settlement.
 
This case is dismissed with prejudice as a settlement has been reached.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top