Lawsuit: Dismissed Marissa4 v. Splashyboi74

Status
Not open for further replies.

BlestSnow636130

Citizen
.BlestSnow636130
.BlestSnow636130
Joined
Sep 27, 2024
Messages
3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT



CIVIL ACTION



Marissa4,

Plaintiff

v.

SplashyBoi74,

Defendant



COMPLAINT



On October 15, 2024, the Defendant unlawfully killed 15 of the Plaintiff’s animals. This act inflicted both emotional and financial harm upon the Plaintiff by depriving her of valuable property and companionship, in violation of Section 4, Subsection 5 of the Animal & Pet Offences Act.



WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF



I. PARTIES



1. Plaintiff: Marissa4

2. Defendant: SplashyBoi74



II. FACTS



1. The Plaintiff was the caretaker and owner of multiple animals at the time of the incident.

2. On October 15, 2024, the Defendant intentionally killed 15 of the Plaintiff’s animals, as documented in evidence exhibits P-001, P-002, P-003, and P-004.



III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF



1. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant violated Section 4, Subsection (5) of the Animal & Pet Offences Act, which explicitly prohibits the intentional harm or killing of another citizen’s animals without lawful justification.

2. This act resulted in emotional distress and financial loss to the Plaintiff, depriving her of her property and the companionship of her animals.



IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF



The Plaintiff seeks the following relief from the Defendant:



• Compensatory Damages: $2,250 for the loss of animals, calculated at $150 per animal as provided under the Animal & Pet Offences Act.

• Punitive Damages: $10,000 to deter similar conduct in the future.

• Legal Fees: $5,000 under the Legal Damages Act.

• Additional Relief: Any further relief the court may deem appropriate.



By submitting this complaint, I acknowledge and understand the penalties of perjury for any knowingly false statements.



DATED: This 6th, day of November, 2024



Exhibits:
P-0001
Schermafbeelding_2024-10-23_090420.png
P-002
Schermafbeelding_2024-10-23_090447.png
P-003
Schermafbeelding_2024-10-23_090433.png

P-004
Schermafbeelding_2024-10-23_090426.png
 
I have decided to sua sponte this case for one major reason. The plaintiff in the current filing is attempting to prosecute the defendant for crimes violating the Animal & Pet Offences Act. Not only are the crimes alleged summary offense and don't have to be prosecuted but this power of prosecuting is only reserved for the DOJ and I cannot allow a case to move forward where a citizen is trying to exercise such powers. I will allow the plaintiff to refile with a legal case.

This case is dismissed without predjudice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top