Lawsuit: Adjourned Noteblock Co. v. zeos_exe [2022] FCR 63

[jediflashfire]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Noteblock Co.
Plaintiff

v.

zeos_exe
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

So basically, it was early on June 15th 2022. Zeos decided to order some custom songs and a doorbell from those custom songs a while ago. After Gertis had completed the songs and I had finished his doorbell I moved across the country (America) and I was avaliable to make the rest. But then Zeos said he quit so we decided to get money from him because Gertis already made the custom songs and I already made the doorbell. So we start asking him for money then he just ghosts us.

I. PARTIES
1. Noteblock Co. (Plaintiff)
2. Gertis7 (Employee to the Plaintiff)
3. zeos_exe (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. The Defendant asked for a custom jingle from the Plaintiff. Gertis7 then composed the jingle, and PracticeTyping (representing the Plaintiff) put it into noteblocks.
2. The price of $5,000 from Gertis7 was established after his songs were shown. Then, a price of $3,500 was established by the Plaintiff
3. The Defendant has still not paid either party.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff established a solid price for the services rendered, and the Defendant has still not paid.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $5,000 to be paid to Gertis7
2. $3,500 to be paid to the Plaintiff
3. $500 in legal fees

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 23rd day of August, 2022

Attachments:

 

[dygyee]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Noteblock Co. v. zeos_exe [2022] FCR 63. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[dygyee]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Noteblock Co v. zeos_exe [2022] FCR 63

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant contacted the Plaintiff asking for a custom song and doorbell from the Plaintiff.
2. The Plaintiff made the song, and then they agreed on a payment of 5k and 3.5k.
3. The Defendant then quit and refused to pay.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Defendant did not appear before court.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. The Plaintiff isn't allowed to charge the Defendant whatever they want to, without the Defendant agreeing first.
2. The Defendant never agreed to pay the Plaintiff 3.5k for the songs, as this was a charge that the Plaintiff created after the songs were created.
3. However the Defendant did agree to pay 4k for all 4 songs with an additional 1k bonus.
4. In order for the Plaintiff to receive the full 5k, there needs to be proof that all 4 songs were created and installed in the Defendant's desired plot.
5. The Plaintiff has shown proof that they have created 1 song, however there is no proof that there was any other song.

IV. DECISION
1. Because the Plaintiff has only proven that they created 1 song, and the Defendant agreed to pay 4k, plus a 1k bonus for 4 songs, the Plaintiff is entitled to 1k for the song along with the 1k bonus.
2. Because the Plaintiff added on a 3.5k charge at the end that the Defendant didn't agree to, they are not entitled to the 3.5k.
3. I hereby order the DOJ to fine zeos_exe $2,000 and transfer this money to the Plaintiff.
4. Lastly because this is the 2nd time recently that zeos_exe has failed to appear before the court, I hereby charge him with contempt of court, and order the DOJ to issue the correct fine and/or jail time.

The Federal Court thanks all involved.