Lawsuit: Adjourned Ogabogaman1 v. Epicroplay123 [2024] DCR 28

Status
Not open for further replies.

cloverdad19

Citizen
Cloverdad19
Cloverdad19
Attorney
Joined
Jun 20, 2024
Messages
2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Ogabogaman1 (Represented by cloverdad19)
Plaintiff

v.

epicroplay123
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On July 24th, 2024, my client was murdered by Epicroplay123. This is bad, however soon after the first murder Epicroplay123 started repeatedly harassing and murdering my client multiple times over the course of 4 hours without end. My client was Humiliated and belittled by the blasphemous actions of Epicroplay123. On top of these heinous deeds my client experienced extreme psychological and emotional damage from the continuous murders. These unwarranted killings also prevented Ogabogaman1 from engaging in any business or normal activities.


PARTIES
1. Ogabogaman1 ( plaintiff )
2. Epicroplay123 (Defendant)


II. FACTS
1. On July 24th, 2024 Ogabogaman1 was murdered and harassed multiple times by Epicroplay1.
2. This constant harassment severely damaged Ogabogamn1’s emotional framework and his psychological health in general.

III. CLAIMS FOR Relief
1. After multiple hours of being prevented from doing anything normal my client clearly suffered severe emotional and psychological damage.
2. Under the legal damages act emotional damage is when “ Situations in which a person suffers psychological harm due to an entity's negligence or intentional actions.” Epicroplay123 intentionally murdered and harassed my client repeatedly, and as a result of that Ogabogaman1 suffered intense psychological harm.
3. The act of being repeatedly murder causes huge disgrace and shame, and these repeated murders were directed towards my client. Ogabogaman1 was made to look weak and foolish under Epicroplay123’s power.
4. Under the legal damages act humiliation is when “a person has been disgraced, belittled or made to look foolish.” Understandably being murdered multiple times is certainly a disgrace, and my client was also meant to look weak and defenseless because of being murdered multiple times.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $8,000 to be rewarded to the plaintiff in emotional damages
2. $8,000 in humiliation
3. $3,000 in legal fees


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: July, 27th, 2024
 

Attachments

  • ogabogman1 v epicroplay.JPEG
    ogabogman1 v epicroplay.JPEG
    172.8 KB · Views: 63
  • ogabogman1 v epicroplay 2.JPEG
    ogabogman1 v epicroplay 2.JPEG
    509.4 KB · Views: 62
  • ogabogman1 v epicroplay 3.JPEG
    ogabogman1 v epicroplay 3.JPEG
    157.9 KB · Views: 54
  • ogabogman1 v epicroplay 4.JPEG
    ogabogman1 v epicroplay 4.JPEG
    166.9 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:

pgyfUC4.png

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@epicroplay123 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Ogabogaman1 v. Epicroplay123. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
The defendant is hereby held in Contempt of Court for failing to provide an answer to complaint/appear in this courtroom. The DHS is ordered to jail/fine accordingly.


The court will appoint a public defender to defend the defendant.
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

ogabogaman1
Plaintiff

v.

epicroplay123
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. We affirm that ogabogaman1 was murdered twice but deny that they were harrassed
2. We deny the harrassment as caused any damages as there was no harrassment

II. DEFENCES
Being murdered twice is not harrassment. Its being murdered twice which the defense did have the tools to report through /complaint. Nothing presented in the evidence shows hours of "being prevented of doing anything" 3 of the screenshots came within minutes of each other while the fourth happened at least 10 minutes later as it happened in the middle of the night in contrast with the other 3 screenshots. Nothing in the presented evidence shows anything concluding to humilation. Dying and being murdered is a part of the game. It is said to say very common which is why when someone gets murdered no one bats an eye. No one cares enough about the act of murder for the plaintiff to have been humiliated by it.

The Plaintiff already had a remedy to being murdered which is called /complaint. They have failed to show anything that would prove humliation or emotional damages which leads the defense to believe this is nothing by a cash grab. They are asking for $19,000 for only two murders as shown by the evidence which is extremely unreasonable.


DATED: This 7th day of July, 2024.
 
Hi I’m ogabogaman1 and I no longer have cloverdad representing me please allow me to have a 72 hour extension to find a new lawyer
 
You may have a 72 hour extension to find a new lawyer.
 
Now that the extension has passed we will be moving onto discovery. Discovery will end in 3 days unless either party requests to end early.
 
Your Honor I know this is technically late for evidence but I had a very long weekend and Im hoping you will still allow this.
1723485032700.png
1723484919146.png
 
I will allow the evidence submitted. We will be moving onto opening statements. The plaintiff has 72 hours to provide an opening statement.
 
The plantiff has had plenty of time and will be held in contempt of court due to not filing an opening statement. The defendant has 72 hours from now to file an opening statement.
 
OPENING STATEMENTS

The Plaintiff in this case came here and told a very nice story. They cherry picked their evidence to fit that story and they hoped to make a quick cash grab. Sadly for them the rest of the evidence submitted does not line up with their story. They claimed they were harassed as they were brutally murdered multiple times. Yet they have failed to include the fact that they killed the defendant twice as many times as the defendant killed them. This shows that the murder againt the plaintiff was either self defense or mutually agreed upon in some sense.

The Defendant epicroplay123 should not be held liable for harrassment. When looking at the evidence it is easier to believe that the Defendant is the victim more then the plaintiff is. It is very hard to believe that someone just being harrassed is going to kill more then get killed. They were either searching the defendant out in hopes to engage in conflict or they were the one harrassing.

If this was a creative writing class then the Plaintiff should get an A+ for their fiction writing in this case but as this is a court of law and not a creative writing class then the plaintiff should be rewarded nothing. Their story does not line up with the evidence. Epicroplay123 should not be held liable for a well crafted story.
 
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

As the plaintiff has seemed to become unresponsive I ask that we move to Summary judgement in order to no longer waste the courts time. We have already wasted 6 days waiting on the plaintiff and the defense unlike the plaintiff does not like wasting anyones time.
 
The plaintiff will have 72 hours to respond.
 
The plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion for summary judgement. Due to the plaintiff not appearing to this court, the motion for summary judgement is sustained

This court will be in recess pending a verdict.
 

Verdict


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT

Ogabogaman1 v. Epicroplay123 [2024] DCR 28

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. After multiple hours of being prevented from doing anything normal my client clearly suffered severe emotional and psychological damage.
2. Under the legal damages act emotional damage is when “ Situations in which a person suffers psychological harm due to an entity's negligence or intentional actions.”
3. The act of being repeatedly murder causes huge disgrace and shame
4. Under the legal damages act humiliation is when “a person has been disgraced, belittled or made to look foolish.” Understandably being murdered multiple times is certainly a disgrace, and my client was also meant to look weak and defenseless because of being murdered multiple times.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Being murdered twice is not harrassment. Its being murdered twice which the defense did have the tools to report through /complaint. Nothing presented in the evidence shows hours of "being prevented of doing anything" 3 of the screenshots came within minutes of each other while the fourth happened at least 10 minutes later as it happened in the middle of the night in contrast with the other 3 screenshots. Nothing in the presented evidence shows anything concluding to humilation. Dying and being murdered is a part of the game. It is said to say very common which is why when someone gets murdered no one bats an eye. No one cares enough about the act of murder for the plaintiff to have been humiliated by it.

2. The Plaintiff already had a remedy to being murdered which is called /complaint. They have failed to show anything that would prove humliation or emotional damages which leads the defense to believe this is nothing by a cash grab. They are asking for $19,000 for only two murders as shown by the evidence which is extremely unreasonable.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. The plaintiff has claimed humiliation but never shows evidence of the defendant humiliating the plaintiff in any way.
2. The plaintiff has also claimed harassment from the defendant, meanwhile the plaintiff has been murdered 3 times between 10 minutes and one more later on.
3. The plaintiff has failed to show any proof of humiliation or harassment therefore those claims will not be granted by this court.

IV. DECISION
The District Court rules in favor of the Defendant.

The District Court thanks all involved.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top