Pepecuu
Citizen
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2025
- Messages
- 79
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Pepecuu
Plaintiff
v.
YourChillGamer (Formerly Ollie_army)
Defendant
Note: The Defendant had changed their in-game name from Ollie_army to YourChillGamer recently (P-001), thus why the contract has the contract has the contractor's name as Ollie_army, instead of their new in-game name YourChillGamer.
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On January 31, 2025, the Defendant signed a contract ("Contract for Design and Construction Services (“Brick and Browse Ltd.”)") with the Plaintiff (who signed the contract on behalf of the Plaintiff's company, Brick and Browse Ltd.) for the Defendant to provide design and construction services, first in a Player Build World design plot, then the construction of the actual building on the triple merged plots C721, C722, C723. In the contract, it was clearly stated that the Defendant was given 7 calendar days (under Section 3.1 of the contract, P-002) to design this building in PBW, and the PBW phase can only be considered completed once there was written notice by the Plaintiff's company.
The Plaintiff has demonstrated their good faith in the fulfillment of this contract, providing the initial sum as outlined in the contract's section 2.1 (P-003 and P-004), as well as providing feedback on the first iteration (P-005), with issues such as the building height, length (P-006), and width not meeting company specifications. However, after the feedback was given, the Defendant did not reply with their progress for 5 days, and when confronted by the Plaintiff on the progress of the PBW design after the 7 days had passed, the Defendant was unable to provide a valid design that meets the company specifications, the building only being tweaked slightly (P-007), while still having the same original issues of the old design. After this, the Defendant refused to return the money, citing the inability to do so (P-008), but not specifying the reason for the inability to repay the initial sum.
Under section 5.1 of the contract, it is explicitly stated that "The Company may terminate this Contract at any time for cause if the Contractor fails to meet the PBW deadline, the construction deadline, or if the work provided does not meet reasonable professional standards." (P-009), of which the Defendant (being the Contractor) has failed to meet the PBW deadline, as well as has failed to meet the "reasonable professional standards" of keeping the build size to within the limits of the merged plot. Additionally, Under section 5.2 of the contract, it is also explicitly stated that "Upon termination, the Contractor shall refund the upfront and final payment in its entirety should the work not yet be completed or approved by the company."(P-010), thus the Defendant is legally obligated to return the initial monetary sum after the termination of their contract by the Plaintiff's company.
The pdf file of the full contract has been attached to the bottom of this post for the court's convenience.
I. PARTIES
1. Pepecuu (Plaintiff)
2. YourChillGamer (Formerly Ollie_army) (Defendant)
The plaintiff (Pepecuu) will represent themselves.
II. FACTS
1. On January 31, 2025, the Defendant signed a contract with the Plaintiff (who signed the contract on behalf of the Plaintiff's company, Brick and Browse Ltd.) for the Defendant to provide design and construction services.
2. The Plaintiff has done their part in the fulfillment of this contract, providing the initial sum as outlined in the contract's section 2.1, as well as providing feedback on the first iteration, with issues such as the building height, length, and width not meeting company specifications.
3. After the intial feedback was given, the Defendant did not reply with their progress for 5 days, and when confronted by the Plaintiff on the progress of the PBW design after the allotted 7 days had passed, the Defendant was unable to provide a valid design that meets the company specifications, the building only being tweaked slightly, while still having the same original issues of the old design.
4. The Defendant (being the Contractor) has failed to meet the PBW deadline, as well as has failed to meet the "reasonable professional standards" of keeping the build size to within the limits of the merged plot, thus the Plaintiff (on behalf of the company) is able to terminate the contract with the Defendant.
5. The Defendant is legally obligated to return the initial monetary sum after the termination of their contract by the Plaintiff's company, due to section 5.2 of the contract.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Recovery of the initial monetary sum paid to the Defendant (P-004), due to the Defendant's failure to provide the services by the deadlines, as outlined in sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the contract (P-009 and P-010).
2. The Defendant actions show clear disregard for the established laws of Redmont, and financial punishment is required to deter the Defendant and others like them from taking contracts that they are not capable of completing, potentially wasting the valuable time and money of others for a product that will never arrive.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $10000 in Compensatory Damages to recover the money that the Defendant refuses to return.
2. $5000 in Punitive Damages to deter the Defendant and others from taking contracts that they are not capable of completing.
3. Any additional relief the court may deem appropriate.
V. EVIDENCE
