Lawsuit: Dismissed Pepecuu vs MrEntomology [2025] DCR 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
LecheCarne

LecheCarne

Citizen
Joined
Jan 5, 2025
Messages
12
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Pepecuu (Represented by LecheCarne)
Plaintiff

v.

MrEntomology
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On January 6, 2025, around 4am UTC time, Pepecuu was walking around Reville's CBD area, enjoying the democracy we have while window shopping, when suddenly, the defendant entered the scene. Without any text or warning, he proceeds to shoot Pepecuu in the back multiple times, leading to his death. As soon as Pepecuu respawned, he worsened the situation by beating him with a diamond sword multiple times and took around 3 hearts. During the beatings, Pepecuu told MrEntomology to stop this abuse, but to no avail. He felt distress, anger, depression over being powerless in this situation. He proceeded to continue beating him until he pointed a gun to his head, passing an olive, and threateningly asking for Pepecuu to pass it back "for peace". In this entire incident, Pepecuu never fought back or hit MrEntomology, held any weapon, or gave any sign that he wanted to incite or continue the fight. Despite this non aggression, Pepecuu was mocked to the point of depression. It is clear MrEntomology broke section 7 of the Legal damages act, despite having no reason to do so.

I. PARTIES
1. Pepecuu (Plaintiff)
2. (Mr.Entomology (Defense)

II. FACTS
Pepeecuu enters the Raville’s CBD area
Entomology shoots PepeCuu 12 times leading to their death
Pepeecuu respawns and gets beaten with an enchanted diamond sword
Pepeecuu tells MrEntomology to stop attacking him
MrEntomology points a gun to Pepecuu’s head

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Mr.Entomology disrupts Pepeecuu’s peace by shooting him 12 times which the reasonable man would consider emotionally alarming.
2. MrEntomology repeatedly beat Pepecuu within an inch of his life, after being told to stop. This escalated the situation from a normal murder to humiliation
3. MrEntomology pointed a gun at Pepeecuu’s head causing distress and panic within Pepecuu
4. This lasted an hour, anyone being beaten for that amount of time would feel belittled by the perpetrator.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 5,000 in reparations
2. 1,000 in legal fees

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)
AD_4nXf2sRPCwS_XPvpmsAN6ysRqmDBPcmmsme9-Q_nHon2Lwg28S67gaDBJVXFzxCgl_JebyDbCGHsmPP5zq_bI-wPeNTSIaN9NTUUHAVA9h5BUYqkxtT6Uxzk2-PYUIuHA60tNTlY_Pw

AD_4nXcMs-SZFqiydPLvI55T_c0E-2a5htVPFGhyPpZixVuaFh41Jz7bwWNoWlJ7y7hCobCTGisw_MvBixwMOIJt8Zewx5hDs3CyvJY6EKWJG6YEPcsKpcD0yiNiDVJZPpsib0_xOKKmFg

AD_4nXeYLikZox9vJeHQOUwcR7gKlQEKqkFxgUJRlB27OSX2j1WpasjjDKc-JPUp5BB2kBPDwHjO9emNtV-4muO2GmNwbyAx9VzeoZhC1x8scFJgnOneLlO7aflhANaqEsbSMd6WIt1_

AD_4nXcPes_x6d-DaiWibT6pexGPZoue0eO9EYyVM87bDazIEvpjqIi5EnNk9ipaQEG8NdXmZfZ3zmDCAZL9MUiZb7hYLZw7-FDfPgQocpjt3oeJfJppCDJwljGbEbb4lyR-p8oGgCByDA

AD_4nXdjh0akeo15Op-YNW1MgFtngEZMk1xUFFv8nUM2pS_899zekRDD5Fbd3ySimtncFQYwW5lYsIRULrf_e1uM3wCbEVb87_8nEg84y7mtaE5MThJFHjrD7HMq6i3SjFDxwnynSF2VdQ

Witness’ are as follows: Pepecuu
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: January 9th 2025

Proof that I am assigned attorney is attached
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-01-09 173127.png
    Screenshot 2025-01-09 173127.png
    19.4 KB · Views: 37

Writ of Summons


@MrEntomology is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of pepecuu v MrEntomology [2025] DCR 6

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Present, your honor. Dragon Law Firm has been retained to represent MrEntomology in this matter.
 

Motion


MOTION TO DISMISS

Your honor, this is obviously a frivolous case that belongs under DHS jurisdiction. Being murdered one time has not and never will constitute a court case. Even if there was also one instance of assault, the evidence is circumstantial and it still doesn’t map to a proper cause of action in civil court.

 
Alexander P. Love said:

Motion


MOTION TO DISMISS

Your honor, this is obviously a frivolous case that belongs under DHS jurisdiction. Being murdered one time has not and never will constitute a court case. Even if there was also one instance of assault, the evidence is circumstantial and it still doesn’t map to a proper cause of action in civil court.

Click to expand...
Thank you, Your honor.

RESPONSE TO MOTION
Your honor, although murder in itself does not constitute a court case, the constant abuse and humiliation my client underwent breaks section 7 of the Legal Damages act. Murder is only an aspect of the emotional and physical abuse that occurred.
 
Last edited:

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


MrEntomology
Counterplaintiff

v.

pepecuu
Counterdefendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The defense (counterplaintiff) is incurring legal fees as a result of having to hire a law firm to defend him from this frivolous case. We therefore ask for legal fees.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. MrEntomology
2. pepecuu
3. Dragon Law Firm

II. FACTS
1. pepecuu is suing MrEntomology.
2. MrEntomology retained Dragon Law Firm to handle this court case for $5,000.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Legal Damages Act entitles the prevailing party to a minimum of $5,000 in legal fees to recover expenses due to hiring a lawyer.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $5,000 in legal fees (the minimum established by the Legal Damages Act) for Dragon Law Firm is charging the counterplaintiff $5,000 for this defense.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of January, 2024.

 
The plaintiff and defense have agreed to do an in-game trial.
 
LecheCarne said:
(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)
Click to expand...

Objection


Improper Evidence

All exhibits are cropped and exclude context. They are also incorrectly labelled.



Objection


Relevance, Facts not in Evidence, Lacks Foundation

All exhibits exclude the necessary context and are circumstantial, including an editable notepad screenshot and a screen capture of a HUD that could be from anywhere. A tab picture of the plaintiff is irrelevant to anything.



Objection


Hearsay

The picture of the attorney and the client conversation should be done in court under oath and with cross examination. Submitting an out of court statement to prove the truth of the matter asserted is hearsay in almost all legal systems.

 
Alexander P. Love said:

Motion


MOTION TO DISMISS

Your honor, this is obviously a frivolous case that belongs under DHS jurisdiction. Being murdered one time has not and never will constitute a court case. Even if there was also one instance of assault, the evidence is circumstantial and it still doesn’t map to a proper cause of action in civil court.

Click to expand...

Denied


I am unsure the exact rule you wish this case to be dismissed under, mainly because you failed to provide the discovery rule as the Court Rules and Procedures demand (Rule 5.1). What you did include in this motion are claims with little to any reasoning or backing that could fall under multiple different discovery rules by themselves. As I am not a mind reader this is denied.

 
ko531 said:

Denied


I am unsure the exact rule you wish this case to be dismissed under, mainly because you failed to provide the discovery rule as the Court Rules and Procedures demand (Rule 5.1). What you did include in this motion are claims with little to any reasoning or backing that could fall under multiple different discovery rules by themselves. As I am not a mind reader this is denied.

Click to expand...

Motion


MOTION TO DISMISS

Your honor, this is obviously a frivolous case that belongs under DHS jurisdiction. Being murdered one time has not and never will constitute a court case. Even if there was also one instance of assault, the evidence is circumstantial and it still doesn’t map to a proper cause of action in civil court. I therefore move to dismiss with prejudice under rule 5.5, lack of claim.

 
Alexander P. Love said:

Objection


Improper Evidence

All exhibits are cropped and exclude context. They are also incorrectly labelled.



Objection


Relevance, Facts not in Evidence, Lacks Foundation

All exhibits exclude the necessary context and are circumstantial, including an editable notepad screenshot and a screen capture of a HUD that could be from anywhere. A tab picture of the plaintiff is irrelevant to anything.



Objection


Hearsay

The picture of the attorney and the client conversation should be done in court under oath and with cross examination. Submitting an out of court statement to prove the truth of the matter asserted is hearsay in almost all legal systems.

Click to expand...
Improper Evidence
Sustained
All the evidence (besides the proof of representation) is not only incorrectly labelled but not labelled at all. Therefore it is all struck and may be resubmitted before discovery is over with the correct labelling.

Relevance
Partially Sustained
The picture of the defendant in the tab provides nothing of value to this case.

Facts not in Evidence
Overruled.
The Plaintiff has all the time during discovery to provide evidence for their facts.

Lacks Foundation
Overruled

Hearsay
Sustained.
Comments like this should be said during witness testimony where the opposing side has a chance to cross examine and challenge the validity of the testimony.
 
Alexander P. Love said:

Motion


MOTION TO DISMISS

Your honor, this is obviously a frivolous case that belongs under DHS jurisdiction. Being murdered one time has not and never will constitute a court case. Even if there was also one instance of assault, the evidence is circumstantial and it still doesn’t map to a proper cause of action in civil court. I therefore move to dismiss with prejudice under rule 5.5, lack of claim.

Click to expand...

Denied


DHS deals with the criminal charges but not the civil. Just because criminal punishment occurs does not mean one is immune from civil liability. For lack of claim the plaintiff has filed a claim of relief including Emotional damages and Humiliation while evidence for these claims don't have to be provided until discovery.




We will now be entering discovery. Discovery will last 72 hours starting now.
 
Thank you, your honor, for allowing me to resubmit my evidence, the evidence is as follows:

P-001
This is the murder message my client received after the defendant murdered her
 

Attachments

  • evidence 4.jpg
    evidence 4.jpg
    151.8 KB · Views: 21
P-002
This is my clients command history before, during, and after the incident
 

Attachments

  • Evidence 3.png
    Evidence 3.png
    10.3 KB · Views: 27
P-003
This is a screenshot of my client's hearts after the incident
 

Attachments

  • Evidence 1.png
    Evidence 1.png
    22.1 KB · Views: 15
LecheCarne said:
Thank you, your honor, for allowing me to resubmit my evidence, the evidence is as follows:

P-001
This is the murder message my client received after the defendant murdered her
Click to expand...
Interrogatory
1. How many times did MrEntomology allegedly kill the plaintiff?
 
LecheCarne said:
P-002
This is my clients command history before, during, and after the incident
Click to expand...

Objection


Improper Evidence

This is an editable chat log and therefore cannot be verified.

 
The defense will be calling MrEntomology as a witness.
 
LecheCarne said:
however after respawning they were battered, and threatened with a gun.
Click to expand...

Objection


Nothing Pending

I only asked how many times he was killed.

 
Good day your honour, defence,
I am now present as the witness to the case. My apologies for the late response as due to timezone differences, I was temporarily incapacitated by natural bodily functions.
 
P-004 (edited of 10:03 pm, 1/14/2025)
This is a picture of the modification history of my client's command history taken today. It was last edited on January 7th, 1:12:53. This is when my client logged off and their command history automatically updated itself. If my client altered the file in any way, the date on the modified section would be around 1:30:00 on January 7th, when the original screenshot was taken.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-01-12 140025.png
    Screenshot 2025-01-12 140025.png
    124.6 KB · Views: 23
Last edited:
LecheCarne said:
P-003
This is a picture of the modification history of my client's command history taken today. It was last edited on January 7th, 1:12:53. This is when my client logged off and their command history automatically updated itself. If my client altered the file in any way, the date on the modified section would be around 1:30:00 on January 7th, when the original screenshot was taken.
Click to expand...

Objection


Relevance, Improper Evidence

All we see is the modification history of some document named command_history, whether or not it is the one that corresponds to the document in question is unverifiable. One can name any file that, and that could be from any player's PC even if it were a real command history file. That makes this unverifiable piece of evidence improper and irrelevant.

 
Alexander P. Love said:

Objection


Relevance, Improper Evidence

All we see is the modification history of some document named command_history, whether or not it is the one that corresponds to the document in question is unverifiable. One can name any file that, and that could be from any player's PC even if it were a real command history file. That makes this unverifiable piece of evidence improper and irrelevant.

Click to expand...
Overruled

Technically all evidence has the chance to be edited or fake therefore I will not be striking this evidence. Unless you have proof that it is edited or any other reason it may be improper besides theories then it will be struck.
 
LecheCarne said:
P-003
This is a picture of the modification history of my client's command history taken today. It was last edited on January 7th, 1:12:53. This is when my client logged off and their command history automatically updated itself. If my client altered the file in any way, the date on the modified section would be around 1:30:00 on January 7th, when the original screenshot was taken.
Click to expand...

Objection


Improper Evidence

The plaintiff submitted two pieces marked P-003.



LecheCarne said:
P-003
This is a screenshot of my client's hearts after the incident
Click to expand...

Objection


Relevance and Lack of Foundation

There is no evidence that this happened in the time period alleged, or even belonged to the plaintiff. It is just a picture of a random HUD with missing hearts and cannot possibly be of use to the Court.

 
Alexander P. Love said:

Objection


Improper Evidence

The plaintiff submitted two pieces marked P-003.




Objection


Relevance and Lack of Foundation

There is no evidence that this happened in the time period alleged, or even belonged to the plaintiff. It is just a picture of a random HUD with missing hearts and cannot possibly be of use to the Court.

Click to expand...
Permission to respond, Your honor?
 
LecheCarne said:
Permission to respond, Your honor?
Click to expand...
Response to lack of foundation.
It is purely theoretical that this screenshot was not taken at the time of the incident or was not taken by my client. As stated earlier, all evidence has the chance to be fake.

Response to improper evidence,
I have edited the exhibit number on the original thread as p-004
 
Alexander P. Love said:

Objection


Improper Evidence

The plaintiff submitted two pieces marked P-003.




Objection


Relevance and Lack of Foundation

There is no evidence that this happened in the time period alleged, or even belonged to the plaintiff. It is just a picture of a random HUD with missing hearts and cannot possibly be of use to the Court.

Click to expand...
Improper Evidence Overruled.
The plaintiff has fixed this mistake

Lack of Foundation Sustained.
There is a million different ways these hearts could have been lost. The court can not accept this on its own as fact of anything unless it has supporting evidence which it does not.
 
Sorry for the wait I have been busy, but now that discovery is over I will be dismissing this case Sua Sponte for Lack of Claim.


Just looking at the facts of the complaint, they have been left unproven. 95% of Fact 1 is unproven (besides the death) and Facts 2, 3, 4, 5 are all completely unproven. All the evidence that has been provide is either completely circumstantial or doesn't prove anything.

All the claims in this complaint rely on the intense nature of this crime and what emotional, humilation and distressing damages they caused. For this case to move on as it currently stands, Either side could make claims for or against these damages while I would not be able to decipher truth from hyperbole or from straight lies.


This case is dismissed with prejudice.

EDIT: to address the counterclaims I accidently overlooked, I will be granting the defense $5,000 in legal fees.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top