- Joined
- Jan 3, 2025
- Messages
- 10
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RaiTheGuy07 (Represented by Superwoops)
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Homeland Security
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
Raitheguy07 was fired from the Department of Homeland Security on 16/02 by Secretary of DHS HellsideBurnton for “murder”. The “murders” for which he was terminated were consensual from the receiving party; therefore, they do not constitute murder. Upon realizing that he had become wanted, Rai opened a ticket with DHS, hoping to clear up this issue and have these murder charges removed from his criminal record. Having been opened on the 15th, the ticket goes unanswered and unsolved to this day. Not only did DHS fire Raitheguy07 for having killed others despite having received their express consent, they fired him without following their own protocol. These actions caused great harm to RaiTheGuy07.
I. PARTIES
1. RaiTheGuy07
2. Department of Homeland Security
II. FACTS
1. 12/02 Raitheguy receives a first offense infraction for murder. (See Infractions)
2. Raitheguy07 kills Doc upon receiving express verbal consent to do so. (P-001)
3. Raitheguy07 kills IamJeb_ upon receiving express verbal consent to do so. (P-002 and P-003)
4. Raitheguy07 is unlawfully arrested and sent to jail for two counts of murder.
5. Raitheguy07 kills Argen_Lee with his consent. (P-004 and P-005)
6. Raitheguy07 is unlawfully arrested and sent to jail for one count of murder.
7. 15/02 Raitheguy07 opens a ticket with DHS hoping to revert his criminal record for these murders.
8. 16/02 Raitheguy07 is terminated from the DHS for “murder” (See Infractions), a termination which became widespread public knowledge.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The DHS did not follow their own procedure to discipline employees. Using Ko531 v. Department of Health [2022] DCR 59 as precedent, it is clear that Departments must handle their employees' terminations according to their regulations. The Department of Homeland Security has a Code of Conduct that determines how employees are punished, which states that "Terminations automatically occur after a 3rd major offense or a 4th minor offense." Anything not constituting a 3rd major offense or a 4th minor offense or higher could warrant other disciplinary actions, but not termination. Since the killings in question do not constitute murders, they also should not count towards infractions. Furthermore, even if one assumes that the murders were illegal, (which they were not) Raitheguy07 should have received a verbal warning, a second time warning, be put under probation, then terminated, which did not happen. Therefore, under the Commercial Standards Act, this constitutes an unfair dismissal.
2. While the Plaintiff spent a total of 30 minutes in jail, he could have been doing other activities relating to his job, like arresting criminals, and/or painting frogs, a hobby through which he earns significant funds (as much as $50,000 per piece). (P-006)
3. The fact that my client has been made a criminal is, for him, angering by itself. Being arrested for those crimes is significantly more preposterous and exasperating. But, being fired for those crimes is orders of magnitude worse, and constitutes an outrageous act by DHS. Even more aggravating is the fact that my client still hasn't received a definitive answer in his DHS ticket.
4. My client's termination has become public knowledge and as a result, his reputation has been harmed (P-007). The No More Defamation Act states that my client could be entitled to an apology from the defaming party.
5. As a result of his firing, my client has begun to enjoy life in Redmont less, as his job meant a lot to him.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Raitheguy07 be found not guilty for the murders of Doc, IamJeb_, and Argen_Lee from Raitheguy07's, and subsequently, his criminal record be expunged.
2. Immediate reinstatement of Raitheguy07 as Recruit in the Department of Homeland Security.
3. $1,500 in compensatory damages, as my client is entitled to $50 per minute spent in jail, according to the Standardised Criminal Code Act.
4. $5,000 in compensatory damages for missed earning capacity while in prison, as well as lost salary for arrests in the two days of playtime my client has had since his termination.
5. $35,000 in punitive damages for the Department of Homeland Security's outrageous conduct in the handling of this case. Is a reasonable person supposed to expect that you can be fired from a government job for crimes you didn't commit, all the while blatantly disregarding Department policy? My client was an outstanding member of the police force and did not deserve this treatment.
6. $10,000 in emotional damages, as this whole process, along with my client's sudden termination and the need to file a lawsuit to gain his job back and right these wrongs has caused him great anger and grief.
7. $20,000 for Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont.
8. $10,000 for reputational loss (through defamation) by stating that my client committed murder.
9. A public apology from DHS to my client, Raitheguy07.
10. $24,450 in legal fees, corresponding to 30% of the value of this case.
EVIDENCE:
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 22nd day of February, 2025.