- Joined
- Jan 3, 2025
- Messages
- 43
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
siebelol7
Plaintiff
v.
ForeverShadow1
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On January 19, 2025, at approximately 10:20 AM UTC, the Defendant unlawfully trespassed onto the Plaintiff's rented farm, identified as Wl-f086, under the false pretense of being "friends with the owner".
Upon discovering that the Plaintiff was the rightful tenant and not an acquaintance, the Defendant escalated the situation by brandishing a firearm and pointing it directly at the Plaintiff. Despite the Plaintiff's pleas for the Defendant to vacate the premises, the Defendant refused and, without justification, fatally shot the Plaintiff on the spot.
Following this initial act of violence, the Defendant continued to harass and repeatedly murder the Plaintiff over the course of the next few hours, severely disrupting their agricultural operations. These outrageous actions made by the Defendant displays their lack of responsibility to follow Redmont law.
Additionally, These killings had caused large quantities of clues such as blood splatter, to be strewn all over the farming area, leading to the Plaintiff and his employees to be unable to grow their usual agricultural produce for an extended period of time.
I. PARTIES
1. siebelol7 (Plaintiff)
2. ForeverShadow1 (Defendant)
The plaintiff will be represented by Pepecuu, and Proof of Representation is attached below.
II. FACTS
1. On January 19, 2025, at the Defendant unlawfully trespassed onto the Plaintiff's rented farm, under the false pretense of being "friends with the owner" (P-001).
2. Despite the Plaintiff's pleas for the Defendant to vacate the premises (P-002), the Defendant refused and fatally shot the Plaintiff on the spot (P-003).
3. The Defendant continued to murder the Plaintiff numerous times (P-004 to P-006), causing significant disruption to the Plaintiff’s work as a farmer.
4. These killings had caused large quantities of “clues” to be strewn all over the farming area, leading to the Plaintiff and his employees to be unable to grow their usual agricultural produce for an extended period of time.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Lost income due to blood splatter all over the farm, causing the farm to be unable to grow for 3 days (P-007).
2. The defendant’s dangerous and violent actions (P-004 to P-006) shows the total disregard of Redmont law, and therefore should be punished and deterred.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $9361.20 in Compensatory Damages due to lost income in the time period between 19th January 2025 and 22nd January 2025. Over the 3 days, the Plaintiff lost 11.6 hours worth of production, calculated by the formula (27.08333 (The playtime of the Plaintiff for the last 7 days, as shown in P-008) / 7 days * 3 days (The length of the time in which the Plaintiff had lost their income)).
In these 11.6 hours of playtime, the Plaintiff is estimated to have lost 556.8 stacks of sugarcane, based on the harvesting rate of 4 stacks of sugarcane (P-009) per 5 minutes (P-010), multiplied by the 11.6 hours of playtime. The plaintiff is also estimated to have lost 1461.6 stacks of wheat, based on the harvesting rate of 14 stacks of haybales per hour (P-011), multiplied by 9 due to the conversion between haybale blocks to wheat (P-012), and further multiplied by 11.6 hours of playtime. Therefore, the loss in crop production have a value of $2784 (at $5 per stack (P-013)) and $6577.20 (at $4.50 per stack (P-014)) for the sugarcane and haybales respectively.
2. $5000 in Punitive Damages as punishment and deterrence for the Defendant and others who wish to commit similar crimes and undermine the rule of law in Redmont.
3. $4308.36 in Legal Fees (30% of the value of the case) to cover the costs the Plaintiff incurred hiring Pepecuu as their legal counsel in this case.
V. EVIDENCE
