Lawsuit: Adjourned Smokeyybunnyyy v. V__D [2024] DCR 30

[ko531]

N THE FEDERAL COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT
CIVIL ACTION

Smokeyybunnyyy
Plaintiff

v.

V__D
Defendant

COMPLAINT
Smokeyybunnyyy and V__D (formerly known as Dumbyhead1234) used to be married. During this marriage they adopted 5 children. Since these adoptions Smokeyybunnyyy and V__D have since divorced. According to the Marriage act when couples divorce they must agree who has custody and in the event they disagree then they must come to the district court for a court ordered custody agreement. That is the purpose of this Lawsuit, V__D and Smokeyybunnyyy have failed to agree who has custody over their children.


I. PARTIES
1. Smokeyybunnyyy
2. V__D

II. FACTS
1. Smokeyyy and V__D (formerly known as Dumbyhead1234) adopted 5 children during their marriage (Itskatto, igelic, totemundying, craftyiso and stoppers)
2. Smokeyyy and V__D have divorced since the adoption of these children
3. Smokeyyy and V__D have failed to come to a custody agreement

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Marriage act section 8.3 states: "In the event that divorced spouses cannot reach a custody agreement privately, they must file for custody in the District Court in order to reach a court-ordered custody agreement."

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. Smokeyyy wishes to have complete custody over all 5 children adopted in her marriage with V__D.

V. EVIDENCE
Itskatto Adoption Registration

igelic Adoption Registration

totemundying Adoption Registration

Craftyiso Adoption Registration

Stoppers Adoptions Registration

Act of Congress - Marriage Act

Spoiler: P-1

Edit: Spelling mistake

 

[Aladeen]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@v__d is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Smokeyybunnyyy v. V__D [2024] DCR 30. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Aladeen]

Before starting I would strongly suggest both the Plaintiff and the Defendant to consider having an in-game trial.

 

[Aladeen]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Smokeyybunnyyy v. V__D [2024] DCR 30

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The plaintiff seeks full custody of the five children they adopted during her marriage with the defendant.
2. The plaintiff has stated that since the divorce, both parties have failed to reach a custody agreement, needing to get court intervention as per section 8.3 of the Marriage Act.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The defendant did not appear before the court.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. Given the defendant's failure to appear and contest the claims presented by the plaintiff, the court has considered a default judgment.

IV. DECISION
1. This court hereby grants summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, given that the defendant did not appear before the court and decided not to dispute the facts. This court orders that the plaintiff shall have full custody of all five children adopted during her marriage to the defendant. The court would also like to remind to the defendant that this summary judgment can be appealed to the Federal Court.

The District Court thanks all involved.