Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Aveke [2024] FCR 126

[EpicFought]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.

Aveke
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, Aveke, has engaged in a series of illegal and criminal activities. Specifically, the Defendant has been involved in the trafficking of illegal substances, the commission of targeted assaults (i.e., murdering people for money), and the distribution of illegal buffs.

The evidence presented in this complaint unequivocally establishes the Defendant’s involvement in these criminal actions, and such evidence will be utilized in support of the prosecution as this case proceeds. Furthermore, in the evidence provided, the Defendant explicitly admits to having committed twenty murders in exchange for money being a hitman. Additionally, the Defendant acknowledges involvement in the sale of illegal buffs.

This behavior constitutes clear violations of the criminal laws, and as such, the Defendant should be held accountable for their unlawful actions.

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
The Defendant, Aveke, is charged with the trafficking of illicit substances and conspiracy for financial gain. Evidence for these claims has been attached below.

I. PARTIES

1. The Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Aveke

II. FACTS

1. The Defendant, Aveke, is accused of engaging in a series of illegal and criminal activities, including the trafficking of illegal buffs and the act of multiple targeted murders.
   
   
2. The Defendant has admitted to participating in the trafficking of illegal buffs, including the distribution of these substances.
   
   
3. The Defendant has explicitly confessed to committing at least twenty murders for financial compensation, being as a hitman.
   
   
4. The Defendant’s continued engagement in illegal activities during this period, while the police are unable to take action (since the plugin is down), highlights the Defendant’s intent to further exploit vulnerabilities (Proof of the Defendant stating that the police can't send him to jail since the plugin is down, is on the video. EVIDENCE #2) in the legal system.
   
   
5. Given the seriousness and ongoing nature of the Defendant’s crimes, the Prosecution asserts that the Defendant should be held accountable for their actions as soon as the legal process can proceed, to protect public safety and uphold the law.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. Illicit Substance Trafficking: The Defendant is charged with the trafficking and distribution of illegal buffs. The Defendant is accused of knowingly participating in the sale of illegal substances.
2. Conspiracy: The Defendant is charged with conspiring to commit murder, including planning and carrying out at least twenty murders for financial compensation.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. Illicit Subtance Traficking: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $5,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.
2. Conspiracy: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $10,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.

EVIDENCES

Spoiler: P-001

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of November 2024

 

[Jakovus]

Writ of Summons

@Aveke is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth v. Aveke [2024] FCR 126.​

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[EpicFought]

Your Honour,
It has been 72 hours since the writ of summons and the defendant has failed to appear in the court.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Your Honor, the prosecution respectfully requests a verdict.

 

[Jakovus]

The Court is currently reviewing options for appointment of a Public Defender, I request of the Prosecution to be patient.

For now, Court stands in recess.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

The Defense Is present, your honor.

 

[Jakovus]

Now that the Public Defence Programme is active again, Public Defender is assigned to the Defendant.

Discovery is now open and will last 48 hours. If an extension is needed, notify the Court in reasonable advance.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Your honor, as the public defense office has yet to make first contact with the defendant, we ask for the full three days (72 hours) for discovery.

 

[Jakovus]

Does the Prosecution concur?

 

[Freeze_Line]

The Prosecution believes the 48 hours already granted is sufficient for discovery and sees no need for further extension.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Your honor, with due respect to the prosecution, it places an undue burden upon the defense to create a quality defense within 48 hours without contact with the defendant.

 

[Jakovus]

The Discovery deadlines remain in effect, seeing as both parties do not concur on whether to extend it.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

The defense moves that the court reconsider its previous decision and grant an extension of discovery for the full three days (72 hours), and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. In the court's decision, it cited a lack of assent by the prosecution. The defense contends that assent by the prosecution is in no way necessary for an extension of discovery, and that the extension is decided purely through the discretion of the presiding officer (Rule 4.4 [Request for Extension of Discovery]).
2. Pursuant to Rule 4.3 (Required Days of Discovery), Discovery shall last for up to 3 days.
3. Due to the current circumstances faced by the defense, and with continuous struggles to make contact with the defendant, it proves itself reasonable that the defense would at least be allotted the regular time for discovery (72 hours), instead of the unnecessarily shorter time-frame currently granted.

 

[Jakovus]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

The defense moves that the court reconsider its previous decision and grant an extension of discovery for the full three days (72 hours), and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. In the court's decision, it cited a lack of assent by the prosecution. The defense contends that assent by the prosecution is in no way necessary for an extension of discovery, and that the extension is decided purely through the discretion of the presiding officer (Rule 4.4 [Request for Extension of Discovery]).
2. Pursuant to Rule 4.3 (Required Days of Discovery), Discovery shall last for up to 3 days.
3. Due to the current circumstances faced by the defense, and with continuous struggles to make contact with the defendant, it proves itself reasonable that the defense would at least be allotted the regular time for discovery (72 hours), instead of the unnecessarily shorter time-frame currently granted.

Sustained

As the conditions are peculiar here, the Court will extend the Discovery to 72h since its opening. Now, it is important to note that:
1) It is a long standing convention to see if there is interest between both parties to extend the Discovery, and if they fail to reach a concensus, the status quo remains;
2) Discovery shall last up to three days, and it lies at the presiding officer's discretion on whether they will make it 72 hours or less.

Again, the Court recognises the necessity of this extension in ensuring a fair trial for the Defendant.

Current deadline is extended by 24 hours, please adhere to it.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.

Aveke
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, Aveke, has engaged in a series of illegal and criminal activities. Specifically, the Defendant has been involved in the trafficking of illegal substances, the commission of targeted assaults (i.e., murdering people for money), and the distribution of illegal buffs.

The evidence presented in this complaint unequivocally establishes the Defendant’s involvement in these criminal actions, and such evidence will be utilized in support of the prosecution as this case proceeds. Furthermore, in the evidence provided, the Defendant explicitly admits to having committed twenty murders in exchange for money being a hitman. Additionally, the Defendant acknowledges involvement in the sale of illegal buffs.

This behavior constitutes clear violations of the criminal laws, and as such, the Defendant should be held accountable for their unlawful actions.

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
The Defendant, Aveke, is charged with the trafficking of illicit substances and conspiracy for financial gain. Evidence for these claims has been attached below.

I. PARTIES

1. The Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Aveke

II. FACTS

1. The Defendant, Aveke, is accused of engaging in a series of illegal and criminal activities, including the trafficking of illegal buffs and the act of multiple targeted murders.
   
   
2. The Defendant has admitted to participating in the trafficking of illegal buffs, including the distribution of these substances.
   
   
3. The Defendant has explicitly confessed to committing at least twenty murders for financial compensation, being as a hitman.
   
   
4. The Defendant’s continued engagement in illegal activities during this period, while the police are unable to take action (since the plugin is down), highlights the Defendant’s intent to further exploit vulnerabilities (Proof of the Defendant stating that the police can't send him to jail since the plugin is down, is on the video. EVIDENCE #2) in the legal system.
   
   
5. Given the seriousness and ongoing nature of the Defendant’s crimes, the Prosecution asserts that the Defendant should be held accountable for their actions as soon as the legal process can proceed, to protect public safety and uphold the law.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. Illicit Substance Trafficking: The Defendant is charged with the trafficking and distribution of illegal buffs. The Defendant is accused of knowingly participating in the sale of illegal substances.
2. Conspiracy: The Defendant is charged with conspiring to commit murder, including planning and carrying out at least twenty murders for financial compensation.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. Illicit Subtance Traficking: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $5,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.
2. Conspiracy: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $10,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.

EVIDENCES

Spoiler: EVIDENCE #1

Spoiler: EVIDENCE #2

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of November 2024

INTERROGATORY:
When were each of these videos captured?

 

[Freeze_Line]

INTERROGATORY:
When were each of these videos captured?

Both of these videos were captured on November 10, 2024. Evidence #2 was captured shortly after Evidence #1.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.

Aveke
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, Aveke, has engaged in a series of illegal and criminal activities. Specifically, the Defendant has been involved in the trafficking of illegal substances, the commission of targeted assaults (i.e., murdering people for money), and the distribution of illegal buffs.

The evidence presented in this complaint unequivocally establishes the Defendant’s involvement in these criminal actions, and such evidence will be utilized in support of the prosecution as this case proceeds. Furthermore, in the evidence provided, the Defendant explicitly admits to having committed twenty murders in exchange for money being a hitman. Additionally, the Defendant acknowledges involvement in the sale of illegal buffs.

This behavior constitutes clear violations of the criminal laws, and as such, the Defendant should be held accountable for their unlawful actions.

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
The Defendant, Aveke, is charged with the trafficking of illicit substances and conspiracy for financial gain. Evidence for these claims has been attached below.

I. PARTIES

1. The Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Aveke

II. FACTS

1. The Defendant, Aveke, is accused of engaging in a series of illegal and criminal activities, including the trafficking of illegal buffs and the act of multiple targeted murders.
   
   
2. The Defendant has admitted to participating in the trafficking of illegal buffs, including the distribution of these substances.
   
   
3. The Defendant has explicitly confessed to committing at least twenty murders for financial compensation, being as a hitman.
   
   
4. The Defendant’s continued engagement in illegal activities during this period, while the police are unable to take action (since the plugin is down), highlights the Defendant’s intent to further exploit vulnerabilities (Proof of the Defendant stating that the police can't send him to jail since the plugin is down, is on the video. EVIDENCE #2) in the legal system.
   
   
5. Given the seriousness and ongoing nature of the Defendant’s crimes, the Prosecution asserts that the Defendant should be held accountable for their actions as soon as the legal process can proceed, to protect public safety and uphold the law.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. Illicit Substance Trafficking: The Defendant is charged with the trafficking and distribution of illegal buffs. The Defendant is accused of knowingly participating in the sale of illegal substances.
2. Conspiracy: The Defendant is charged with conspiring to commit murder, including planning and carrying out at least twenty murders for financial compensation.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. Illicit Subtance Traficking: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $5,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.
2. Conspiracy: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $10,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.

EVIDENCES

Spoiler: EVIDENCE #1

Spoiler: EVIDENCE #2

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of November 2024

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE

Pursuant to the 'I Admit Act', "an admission of guilt on its own cannot be used as sole evidence for a crime being committed, in order to be admissible it must be proven the crime actually happened - the point of an Admission of Guilt is to prove who did it." Evidence two only shows an admission of guilt, with no evidence of any crime regarding the admission (murder in exchange for compensation) having occurred. Because of this, according to the 'I Admit Act', evidence two is therefor inadmissible. For this reason, the defense moves that it be struck from the record.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.

Aveke
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, Aveke, has engaged in a series of illegal and criminal activities. Specifically, the Defendant has been involved in the trafficking of illegal substances, the commission of targeted assaults (i.e., murdering people for money), and the distribution of illegal buffs.

The evidence presented in this complaint unequivocally establishes the Defendant’s involvement in these criminal actions, and such evidence will be utilized in support of the prosecution as this case proceeds. Furthermore, in the evidence provided, the Defendant explicitly admits to having committed twenty murders in exchange for money being a hitman. Additionally, the Defendant acknowledges involvement in the sale of illegal buffs.

This behavior constitutes clear violations of the criminal laws, and as such, the Defendant should be held accountable for their unlawful actions.

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
The Defendant, Aveke, is charged with the trafficking of illicit substances and conspiracy for financial gain. Evidence for these claims has been attached below.

I. PARTIES

1. The Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Aveke

II. FACTS

1. The Defendant, Aveke, is accused of engaging in a series of illegal and criminal activities, including the trafficking of illegal buffs and the act of multiple targeted murders.
   
   
2. The Defendant has admitted to participating in the trafficking of illegal buffs, including the distribution of these substances.
   
   
3. The Defendant has explicitly confessed to committing at least twenty murders for financial compensation, being as a hitman.
   
   
4. The Defendant’s continued engagement in illegal activities during this period, while the police are unable to take action (since the plugin is down), highlights the Defendant’s intent to further exploit vulnerabilities (Proof of the Defendant stating that the police can't send him to jail since the plugin is down, is on the video. EVIDENCE #2) in the legal system.
   
   
5. Given the seriousness and ongoing nature of the Defendant’s crimes, the Prosecution asserts that the Defendant should be held accountable for their actions as soon as the legal process can proceed, to protect public safety and uphold the law.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. Illicit Substance Trafficking: The Defendant is charged with the trafficking and distribution of illegal buffs. The Defendant is accused of knowingly participating in the sale of illegal substances.
2. Conspiracy: The Defendant is charged with conspiring to commit murder, including planning and carrying out at least twenty murders for financial compensation.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. Illicit Subtance Traficking: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $5,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.
2. Conspiracy: The Prosecution recommends a sentence of a $10,000 fine and 30 minutes of jail time.

EVIDENCES

Spoiler: EVIDENCE #1

Spoiler: EVIDENCE #2

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of November 2024

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

The defense moves that Evidence #1 and Evidence #2 are stricken from the record, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Pursuant to rule 'Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily)', the only permissible evidence formats are "(plaintiff/p-### / defense/d-###)."
2. The prosecution's evidence does not fit this format, therefor the defense motions to strike each of these pieces of evidence, as "evidence that is not properly formatted can be motioned to be struck for improper formatting" 'Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily)'.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Your Honor, the prosecution moves to amend the complaint as follows:

• 1. Rename EVIDENCE #1 to P-001.
  • Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily) was primarily created for evidence provided during discovery. However, to make this more formal, the prosecution requests renaming the evidence provided prior to discovery.
    
    
• 2. Strike or remove EVIDENCE #2 as well as the Conspiracy charge.
  • Due to some issues with the jail plugin, the prosecution will be unable to provide further evidence to overcome the I Admit Act.

Finally, if the court sustains these changes, the prosecution requests that the court apply these changes, as the previous prosecutor won't be able to do so due to personal issues.

 

[Jakovus]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE

Pursuant to the 'I Admit Act', "an admission of guilt on its own cannot be used as sole evidence for a crime being committed, in order to be admissible it must be proven the crime actually happened - the point of an Admission of Guilt is to prove who did it." Evidence two only shows an admission of guilt, with no evidence of any crime regarding the admission (murder in exchange for compensation) having occurred. Because of this, according to the 'I Admit Act', evidence two is therefor inadmissible. For this reason, the defense moves that it be struck from the record.

Overruled.

In Article 3, Section 1, it is stated that such evidence can be used to satisfy the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt. First video shows the Defendant handling illegal substances; their admission of guilt may serve to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt in this matter. It is not the sole evidence, and whether it will be enough to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt will be seen at the end of this trial.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

The defense moves that Evidence #1 and Evidence #2 are stricken from the record, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Pursuant to rule 'Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily)', the only permissible evidence formats are "(plaintiff/p-### / defense/d-###)."
2. The prosecution's evidence does not fit this format, therefor the defense motions to strike each of these pieces of evidence, as "evidence that is not properly formatted can be motioned to be struck for improper formatting" 'Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily)'.

Overruled.

I will not strike the entirety of the evidence provided because of this; I will, however, order the Plaintiff to amend the filing so that evidence is labelled as proscribed by the applicable rule.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Your Honor, the prosecution moves to amend the complaint as follows:

• 1. Rename EVIDENCE #1 to P-001.
  • Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily) was primarily created for evidence provided during discovery. However, to make this more formal, the prosecution requests renaming the evidence provided prior to discovery.
    
• 2. Strike or remove EVIDENCE #2 as well as the Conspiracy charge.
  • Due to some issues with the jail plugin, the prosecution will be unable to provide further evidence to overcome the I Admit Act.

Finally, if the court sustains these changes, the prosecution requests that the court apply these changes, as the previous prosecutor won't be able to do so due to personal issues.

Sustained.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMON
TMOTION TO RECONSIDER

The defense moves that the court's ruling on the defense's improper evidence objection be reconsidered, and alleges the following in the support thereof :

1. Your honor, the prosecution itself has admitted that it cannot support its conspiracy charge based on Evidence #2 alone. This is because evidence #2 is not related to the illicit substance trafficking charge, and is instead entered in support of the conspiracy charge.
2. The prosecution's evidence of an admission of guilt is not related to the first piece of evidence, and is instead entered to support the conspiracy charge, which there is no further evidence of.
3. In the video entered as evidence #2, the defendant says he 'sold 20 murders.' The prosecution has itself admitted that there is no evidence of these alleged murders, and so, the defense humbly requests that evidence #2 be stricken under the 'I Admit Act'.
4. Furthermore, the prosecution itself has requested its removal.

 

[Jakovus]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMON
TMOTION TO RECONSIDER

The defense moves that the court's ruling on the defense's improper evidence objection be reconsidered, and alleges the following in the support thereof :

1. Your honor, the prosecution itself has admitted that it cannot support its conspiracy charge based on Evidence #2 alone. This is because evidence #2 is not related to the illicit substance trafficking charge, and is instead entered in support of the conspiracy charge.
2. The prosecution's evidence of an admission of guilt is not related to the first piece of evidence, and is instead entered to support the conspiracy charge, which there is no further evidence of.
3. In the video entered as evidence #2, the defendant says he 'sold 20 murders.' The prosecution has itself admitted that there is no evidence of these alleged murders, and so, the defense humbly requests that evidence #2 be stricken under the 'I Admit Act'.
4. Furthermore, the prosecution itself has requested its removal.

Sustained.

I apologise, the request of the prosecution to take the evidence down was missed by me. I hereby strike P-002.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Your Honor, the prosecution moves to amend the complaint as follows:

• 1. Rename EVIDENCE #1 to P-001.
  • Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily) was primarily created for evidence provided during discovery. However, to make this more formal, the prosecution requests renaming the evidence provided prior to discovery.
    
• 2. Strike or remove EVIDENCE #2 as well as the Conspiracy charge.
  • Due to some issues with the jail plugin, the prosecution will be unable to provide further evidence to overcome the I Admit Act.

Finally, if the court sustains these changes, the prosecution requests that the court apply these changes, as the previous prosecutor won't be able to do so due to personal issues.

You honor, whenever possible, could you please remove the conspiracy charge pursuant to the prosecution's motion to amend the complaint?

 

[Jakovus]

You honor, whenever possible, could you please remove the conspiracy charge pursuant to the prosecution's motion to amend the complaint?

Done.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Defense Witness list:
EpicFought
Freeze_Line

 

[Jakovus]

Now that Discovery is concluded, I call on the Defendant to enter their Plea.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Defense Plea:
As the defense counsel could not make contact with the defendant, and therefor cannot levy a just and honest defense before the court, the defense pleads guilty on the count of Illicit Substance Trafficking.

 

[Jakovus]

I would request that next time the Defendant's counsel use appropriate template.

We are moving to opening statements. Prosecution is called to deliver an opening argument, they have 72h to do so. When they submit it, the Defendant also has 72h.

 

[Anaphase_Andy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

The defense moves that, as there are no facts in dispute, that the case proceeds via summary judgement. The defense asks that, during the court's deliberation, it keeps in mind that the cost of the substance traded in the video was only $100 (as shown in the prosecution's own video). Thank you, your honor.

 

[Jakovus]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

The defense moves that, as there are no facts in dispute, that the case proceeds via summary judgement. The defense asks that, during the court's deliberation, it keeps in mind that the cost of the substance traded in the video was only $100 (as shown in the prosecution's own video). Thank you, your honor.

Does the Prosecution concur?

 

[Freeze_Line]

Does the Prosecution concur?

The prosecution concurs.

 

[Jakovus]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

The defense moves that, as there are no facts in dispute, that the case proceeds via summary judgement. The defense asks that, during the court's deliberation, it keeps in mind that the cost of the substance traded in the video was only $100 (as shown in the prosecution's own video). Thank you, your honor.

Sustained

The Court is now in recess pending verdict.

 

[Jakovus]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT

The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Aveke [2024] FCR 126

I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. The Commonwealth of Redmont alleges that the Defendant, Aveke, facilitated and executed the trafficking of illegal substances, and in support thereof provided P-001. Furthermore, the Prosecution claims that the Defendant participated in sale and distrubution of illegal buffs.


II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Defendant did not contest the facts and pled guilty on the charge of Illegal Substance Trafficking.


III. THE COURT OPINION

1. This verdict is handed out on the basis of presented facts and careful consideration, especially since the Defendant could not be reached.
2. In P-001, the Defendant is clearly visible handling Tyalus Erthro, an illicit substance as per Illicit Substances Offenses Act, Section 6, Subsection 1, Point b); moments later distributing it.
3. It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that such distribution constitutes an offence as described in the Illicit Substances Offenses Act, Section 5, Subsection 5.
4. As extenuating circumstance the Court recognises only a singular Tyalus Erthro was distributed, as well as the guilty plea of the Defendant.

IV. DECISION
In the matter of FCR 126, the court finds the Defendant GUILTY.

1. The Court will amend the recommended sentencing to $2,500 and 10 minutes of jail time.

The Federal Court is now adjourned.