Verdict
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case No. 04-2021-21-03
I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. The Prosecution, represented by Aladeen22, allege that the defendant has violated the Bank Robbery law.
2. The Prosecution asserts that the Defendant was caught at the vault at the time the alarms went off.
II. DEFENDANTS POSITION
1. The Defendant, didna, denies all allegations made by the Prosecution, claiming that they were in the build world at the time of the alleged robbery.
2. The Defendant claims that they were a witness to the prosecutor, Aladeen22, robbing such a bank; and asserts that they were framed for the robbery.
III. THE COURT OPINION
1. In the evidence and testimonies we have heard throughout this case, several eyewitnesses have confirmed the whereabouts of the Defendant during the alleged robbery.
2. The burden of proof is weighed upon the prosecution, which I believe they have proven with the multiple testimonies and evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Defendant committed such a crime.
3. The Defendant claims that Krix was an eyewitness to their alternate whereabouts at the time, however Krix denies that. The lack of any sort of other eyewitness to her whereabouts, in comparison to the testimonies from the other witnesses we have seen, proves that she was not in the location she claimed to be.
4. The Defendant has continuously contradicted themselves throughout this case - claiming that they were in the build world at the time of the alleged robbery, whereas also claiming they witnessed someone else rob the bank.
5. The court finds that the Defendant has committed perjury, in an attempt to mislead the courts in regards to her whereabouts at the time of the crime. This repugnant behaviour came with an intent to falsely accuse another of committing such crime.
6. The court would implore the RBA to consider the removal of the defendant's license to practice law, pursuant of Section 5 of the Legal Board Act.
IV. DECISION
The Court hereby finds the Defendant guilty of the charge of Bank Robbery, and additionally guilty of the charge of Perjury.
The recommended sentence brought by the prosecution, pursuant of the provisions of the charge of Bank Robbery, have been accepted by the court. Seeing as the jail time to Bank Robbery has already been issued, the court sees no reason to issue any further jail time on that charge, as for the fine and the other charge, I've noted the sentence below;
I hereby sentence the Defendant to a:
(a) Fine of $1000 for Bank Robbery
(b) Fine of $500 for Perjury
This case is hereby adjourned.