Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

AmityBlamity

Citizen
Justice Department
Aventura Resident
AmityBlamity
AmityBlamity
State Prosecutor
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
46

Case Filing


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION


Due to the severity of the defendant’s crimes, we request that the court remove v__d from his positions as both the Head of Urban Development and General of the Oakridge Military, and appoint a caretaker in his stead, until the conclusion of this court case. The Department of Justice is of the opinion that the defendant may attempt to use his positions to threaten, coerce, or otherwise influence others in an attempt to obtain a favorable outcome for his case.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

V.

v__d
Defendant

COMPLAINT

The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

On or about March 23rd, 2025, a terrorist attack in the Oakridge Town Hall caused massive damage. In the aftermath of a terrorist attack on Oakridge’s town hall, v__d made several proclamations of violence. Then, Yeet_Boy and v__d gathered a group of people in the streets. As Yeet_Boy claimed, without evidence, that Redmont was responsible for the attack, v__d riled up the crowd and seized control of the town hall by force. He took 1950Minecraft and rorrry___ hostage, ordered his forces to commit acts of violence against groups and specific individuals, and threatened the security and stability of the nation of Redmont in a brutal, illegal display.

I. PARTIES

1. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. v__d (Perpetrator)

II. FACTS

  1. On or about March 23rd, 2025, the Oakridge Town Hall suffered extensive damage during what appeared to be a terrorist attack.
  2. Shortly after, Yeet_Boy encouraged people to join the Oakridge Discord server, to join v__d’s army.
  3. Shortly after, v__d “assured” the people of Oakridge that “We will seek retribution for these violent attacks”, “The Redmont government will pay”,“The WPR will pay”, “The Bedrockers will be killed”, and “We will get revenge for this atrocity”.
  4. Yeet_Boy claimed Oakridge had identified the attacker as “a Bedrock Redmont symapthyzer”. V__d affirms this.
  5. A short while later, Yeet_Boy and v__d gathered a group of people in the streets.
  6. v__d called for RaiTheGuy07 to be ‘interrogated’, demanding that he come with him.
  7. AmityBlamity attempted to intervene, stating v__d had no authority to detain or interrogate RaiTheGuy07. In response, v__d murdered AmityBlamity.
  8. A short while later, v__d states in Global chat that “I think we should go to war”. V__d follows this up by stating “We have to capture the Oakridge isles” and “We must secede”.
  9. A short while later, v__d states in Global “It’s time to put bedrock players to bed”
  10. v__d proceeded to assemble his forces, ordering them to “OCCUPY THE TOWN HALL” and claiming, without evidence, that rebels were attacking the town hall.
  11. V__d proceeded to interrogate Novahss_ asking “Are you an oakridger”, following this up by accusing PricelessAgari of being a “rebel war criminal” and to “kill him on sight”.
  12. Meeting with “Colonel Katto”, v__d again made claims that “the rebels are taking over” and “We must execute them with bullets”.
  13. Shortly afterward, v__d ordered his troops to kill “anyone who is disloyal to Yeet_Boy” and “Anyone who seems suspicious”.
  14. Subsequently, v__d accused President 1950minecrafter of being “an enemy belligerent”, and ordered his troops to “[not] let the president leave”, imprisoning the President within the building.
  15. V__d, in response to accusations that he was an “enemy to the people” claimed he was “a liberator”, before ordering his soldiers to draw their guns and “shoot anyone suspicious”.
  16. V__d gave the order to “Kill RaiTheGuy on sight”.
  17. Shortly after, v__d posted an Ad: “Town hall is under siege by Redmont forces. All Oakridgers are encouraged to defend it. -General VD”
  18. A short while later, v__d addresses his troops, asking “Did you kill the traitor?”
  19. Subsequently, v__d informs the soldiers that “Until Yeet_Boy’s return, the military will police these streets”.
  20. Soon after this, v__d gave the order to “Hit them if they cross the concrete”.
  21. At this point, roryyy___ arrived, demanding to be let in as he was the “Oakridge Head of Residence”. V__d ordered that Rory “be spared” but to “Keep him in his room”. Roryyy___ refused.
  22. Amid some confusion about if martial law has been declared, v__d confirms that “It’s de facto martial law”.
  23. Roryyy___ is forced to retreat into his office. V__d orders Luca to “make sure the hostages stay”.
  24. As the soldiers break into roryyy___’s office, v__d states that “RaiTheGuy07 is an enemy of the Oakridge military for protesting”, declaring the crime “high treason!!!”
  25. V__d praises his soldiers, stating “We’ve seized control of a fractured Oakridge”
  26. As V__d’s soldiers begin butchering roryyy___’s parrots, v__d shows off pricelessAgrari’s head, dubbing it a “head of a terrorist”.
  27. Just after, v__d states “Death to Redmont” in Global.
  28. V__d posts another ad, asking for more soldiers as “The town hall is at siege. The hostages are trying to escape.”
  29. V__d left shortly afterward. From Discord, he declared “The uprising against the violent Redmont must continue”

III. CHARGES
  1. One count of Corruption
    1. Corruption is defined as “The act of using a government position to act to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others to unfairly benefit oneself, or someone else. By applying, being appointed to, or being elected into a position in government, the player agrees to serve the server over themselves.” Nowhere in the Oakridge Constitution was v__d afforded the powers to declare martial law or to assemble his own private army to harass, assault, and murder innocent citizens. In fact, his actions were blatantly unconstitutional, withholding rights on the basis of criminality, unfairly discriminating against those he deemed “suspicious” and “traitors”, and depriving citizens of the right to life, liberty, and security. His selfish, destructive actions were a horrific attempt to tear apart the nation of Redmont and illegally declare an independent nation, for both his own benefit and that of Yeet_Boy.
  2. Nine counts of Incitement
    1. Incitement is defined as “The attempt to coax or encourage someone to break the law.” As we have seen from the footage, there are numerous instances of v__d ordering his soldiers to commit violent, illegal acts. The nine counts are as follows:
      1. Inciting capture of RaiTheGuy07.
      2. Inciting soldiers to kill Priceless on sight
      3. Inciting soldiers to kill anyone who is disloyal to Yeet_Boy and/or is suspicious
      4. Inciting soldiers to keep the President as a hostage
      5. Inciting soldiers to once again “shoot anyone suspicious”
      6. Ordering soldiers to “keep roryyy___ in is room”
      7. Ordering soldiers to make sure the hostages stay
      8. Declaring “the uprising against the violent Redmont must continue”
      9. Ordering Luca to ‘make sure the hostages stay’
  3. Two counts of Hostage Holding
    1. Hosting Holding is defined as “The act of holding a player at gunpoint and not letting them leave until they pay you “ransom”.” Here, v__d directed his soldiers to hold 1950Minecrafter and roryyy___ prisoner, refusing to let them leave, with his demanded ransom being secession from Redmont.
  4. One Count of Violent Disorder
    1. Violent Disorder is defined as “The act of 3 or more persons who are present together where they use or threaten unlawful violence, where the conduct of is such as would cause a person at the scene to fear for their own personal safety”. As you can see from the videos, v__d frequently used his position to order his various soldiers to commit acts of violence, threaten the hostages present at the scene, and employ the use of weapons to inflict brutal violence.
  5. Two Counts of Harassment, Alarm, or Distress
    1. Harassment, Alarm, or Distress is defined as “The act of disorderly behavior towards an individual or a group of individuals, that may be deemed to a reasonable person as causing harassment, alarm, or distress.” There are two specific counts we wish to levy against v__d, namely:
      1. Accusing pricelessAgari of being a rebel war criminal and showing off pricelessAgrari’s head, dubbing it a “head of a terrorist”.
      2. Multiple acts of harassing “RaiTheGuy07”, ordering his interrogation, demanding he be killed on sight, and branding him an enemy of the Oakridge military for protesting.
IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
  1. For the one count of Corruption, a $25,000 fine + removal and exclusion of v__d from public office for a period of two months.
  2. For the nine counts of Incitement, a $3000 fine + 15 minutes of jail time per act of Incitement, totaling $27000 and 135 minutes of jail time.
  3. For the two counts of Hostage Holding, a $100 fine and 10 minutes of jail time per count of Hostage Holding, totaling $200 and 20 minutes of jail time.
  4. For the one count of Violent Disorder, a $10,000 fine and 60 minutes of jail time.
  5. For the two counts of Harassment, Alarm, or Distress, a $10,000 fine and 60 minutes jail time per act of Harassment, Alarm, or Distress, for a total of $20,000 and 120 minutes jail time.
  6. In total, the Prosecution seeks:
    1. The removal and exclusion of v__d from public office for a period of two months.
    2. $82,200 in fines.
    3. 335 minutes of jail time.

V. EVIDENCE


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 6 day of April 2025

 
As the Court clerk, I would like to remind the people above who are not parties to the lawsuit, to refrain from further discussions (unless filing an amicus brief or an action that directly affects the proceedings of this case), as there are appropriate channels to discuss this in the DC discord server.

Thank you for your co-operation. :)
 
This is the funniest thing I’ve read in a long time
POV: You sue someone for corruption in your opposition in response to a member of your political party being removed and then you use your own position to try and punish them. 💀
the press should be watching this trail closely and reporting on the issue gently .

Objection


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Breach of Procedure

Your Honors, none of these people have been summoned to speak, nor are they here to offer Amicus Briefs. Rather, they have seen fit to cause chaos in the court. I find it especially concerning that supporters of the accused have seen fit to disrupt proceedings in this way, instead of seeking to prove his innocence. I ask that they all be found in Contempt of Court and their messages struck from the record.

 

Writ of Summons



@v__d is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Objection. Objection.

Objection


In the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
Breach of Procedure

Your Honors, I'm sure you're just as fed up as I am with these childish interruptions. The Deputy Speaker absolutely should know better, and yet he's seen fit to make a circus of these proceedings. I move he be charged with Contempt of Court and his comments stricken from the record.

 
Present, your honor.
 
72 hours to submit a plea, my apologies.
 
I, v__d, agree for Mezimori to represent me in court.
 
Noted, thank you for letting this Court know.
 
For what purpose? I don't have a defendant lawyer on record (I don't know who from Mezimori will be representing the defendant) for both sides to be represented in a sidebar.
 
For what purpose? I don't have a defendant lawyer on record (I don't know who from Mezimori will be representing the defendant) for both sides to be represented in a sidebar.
The issue relates to a potentially massive Conflict of Interest posed by allowing Mezimori to represent the defendant.
 

Plea



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

V__D (Mezimoří representing)
Defendant

I. PLEA
The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on the charge of Corruption.
The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on Nine charges counts of Incitement.
The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on Two charges of Hostage Holding.
The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on Two charges of Violent Disorder.
The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on Two charges of Harassment, Alarm, or Distress.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 13 day of April 2025

 
I'll invite both parties to a sidebar.
 
We have completed the sidebar and shall now be moving towards Discovery. Discovery will end in 72 hours. Discovery can be voluntarily ended or extended with both parties agreeing to do so. Please remember the following rules:

Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use)​

All material used in legal arguments must have either been included in the case prior to the submission. Material must have been included within the complaint, within the answer, within an amendment to a complaint, within an amendment to an answer, or within a discovery submission. Otherwise the material will be deemed inadmissible and the argument can be voided by the presiding judge.

Rule 4.9 (Witness Protocol)​

A party may submit a list for witnesses at any time before the end of discovery. In order for a witness to be called during witness testimony, they must be announced under this rule, during discovery. Any witness may be objected to according to the objections laid out within rule 6.3.

Failure to adhere to the timelines of this rule may subject that party to a contempt of court charge at the presiding judge’s decision. The presiding judge shall include a warning regarding the timeline when summoning the witness.
 
We have completed the sidebar and shall now be moving towards Discovery. Discovery will end in 72 hours. Discovery can be voluntarily ended or extended with both parties agreeing to do so. Please remember the following rules:

Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use)​

All material used in legal arguments must have either been included in the case prior to the submission. Material must have been included within the complaint, within the answer, within an amendment to a complaint, within an amendment to an answer, or within a discovery submission. Otherwise the material will be deemed inadmissible and the argument can be voided by the presiding judge.

Rule 4.9 (Witness Protocol)​

A party may submit a list for witnesses at any time before the end of discovery. In order for a witness to be called during witness testimony, they must be announced under this rule, during discovery. Any witness may be objected to according to the objections laid out within rule 6.3.

Failure to adhere to the timelines of this rule may subject that party to a contempt of court charge at the presiding judge’s decision. The presiding judge shall include a warning regarding the timeline when summoning the witness.
Your Honor, we still have a pending emergency injunction.
 
Witness List:
  • Roryyy___
  • 1950minecrafter
  • RaiTheGuy07
  • pricelessAgari
 
We wish to ask for 72 hour extension for discovery , I was busy during the week and i lost one of my lawiers that was solving the cases during the week.
 
Back
Top