- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
winterwolf (represented by Dragon Law)
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On the 8th of February 2025 winterwolf declared that they would be contesting a seat as the Head of Commerce of Aventura in the February 2025 Aventura Council Elections. Upon the closing of the declaration period for these council elections, on the 11th of February 2025, the Department of State, publicly for all to see, informed winterwolf that they did not meet the requirements to run for this position. This was done through a forum post in the declarations thread. The forum post specified that the requirement that winterwolf did not meet was: “Have Aventura residency or own property within the Town.” However, there is no legal basis at all for this requirement, nor for there being any other requirements to run for this position. As there are no lawful requirements for the position which winterwolf declared for, winterwolf should have been allowed to run in this election. The Department of State has unlawfully prevented winterwolf from running for this election, thereby impeding on winterwolf’s first right as granted by our Constitution. Protecting the rights and freedoms of our People as outlined in our constitution is of utmost importance, and the Commonwealth must be held accountable for its actions.
I. PARTIES
1. winterwolf (Plaintiff)
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. On the 8th of February, 2025, the Department of State opened a forum thread for the February 2025 Aventura Council Elections. (See Council Elections - FEBRUARY 2025)
2. This thread did not state any requirements to run for the position of Head of Commerce.
3. On the 8th of February, 2025, winterwolf declared that they would be contesting a seat as the Head of Commerce in the February 2025 Aventura Council Elections.
4. On the 11th of February, 2025, the Department of State informed winterwolf that they did not meet one of the requirements to run for the position of Head of Commerce in the February 2025 Aventura Council Elections. The specified requirement was: “Have Aventura residency or own property within the Town.”
5. The requirement “Have Aventura residency or own property within the town” for the position of Head of Commerce in Aventura has no legal basis in the Towns’ Rights Executive Order, the Aventura Constitution, written State Department policy, or anywhere else in law.
6. Winterwolf was not put on the ballot for the Head of Commerce in the February 2025 Aventura Council Elections, and was not given the ability to run in this election by the Department of State.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Our Constitution states: “The Redmont Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it, subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law that are justified in a free and democratic society.” and afterwards states: “(1) The right to participate in, and run for elected office, unless as punishment for a crime.” Our law did not prescribe any limits to run for the position of Head of Commerce in the February 2025 Aventura Elections, yet the Department of State nevertheless removed winterwolf from the ballot. In doing so, the Department of State has impeded on one of winterwolf’s constitutional rights.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. For the February 2025 Aventura Council Election for the position of Head of Commerce to be held with all candidates that declared their intent to run for this position in the forum thread for this election, those candidates being winterwolf and Argen_Lee.
2. $200,000 in punitive damages for the completely outrageous conduct of the Commonwealth of Redmont in handling the February 2025 Aventura Council Elections and for the completely outrageous act of impeding on a constitutionally protected right. In SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont, the Department of State was fined $100,000 for the improper conduct during the January House of Representatives Election. In SCR 5 [2025] AnimeInc & KattoC324 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont, the plaintiffs were awarded $200,000 in punitive damages per plaintiff for the mishandling of the February 2025 Aventura Mayor elections. This case concerns not only the Commonwealth’s improper conduct during an election but also a more severely outrageous conduct by impeding on its own citizens’ constitutionally defined rights.
3. $75,000 in consequential damages for the loss of enjoyment in Redmont, as winterwolf has been abruptly and unrightfully denied the ability to run and participate in an election, as well as to serve in an elected position. These are significant and essential parts of the democratic system of DemocracyCraft and are a big source of enjoyment.
4. $82,500 in legal fees, as prescribed by the Legal Damages Act.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 29th day of March 2025