End
Owner
Owner
Senator
Construction & Transport Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
xEndeavour
Senator
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2020
- Messages
- 2,406
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
xEndeavour
Plaintiff
v.
UnityMaster
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
Unitymaster filed a case against me which was frivolous in nature. It's a waste of my own time and effort to be litigating a case which has absolutely no standing, purpose, or value, and which I assess was filed vexatiously.
I. PARTIES
1. xEndeavour (Plaintiff)
2. UnityMaster (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. UnityMaster filed a case (P-001) which has established no breach of law, nor established any value. Frivolous litigation is proven in that the case not only lacks any legal standing or merit, but also represents a deliberate abuse of the legal process. The Defendant's action is vexatious, purposefully wasteful of the Plaintiff's time, and has no legitimate foundation in fact or law. The case constitutes an egregious misuse of judicial resources and must be dismissed.
2. The judge failed to consider my counter claims in dismissing the case for lack of claim from the Defendant (then plaintiff).
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant, UnityMaster, has initiated a claim against the Plaintiff that is utterly devoid of any legal grounds. The claim is frivolous, with no factual or legal basis supporting the allegations. The Defendant's pursuit of this action reflects a clear disregard for the legal process and an intention to harass and vex the Plaintiff.
2. Frivolous litigation is characterized by the pursuit of claims that are not grounded in law, facts, or evidence. In this case, the Defendant has failed to substantiate any of their claims with verifiable evidence. Moreover, they have refused to provide evidence during the discovery process, thus confirming that their actions are not motivated by a genuine dispute but rather by an intent to waste the Plaintiff's resources and time.
If a vexatious case lacks value and purpose - in a case where nothing is supported by evidence - is not frivolous, then what is?
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 30% of $260,000 is $78,000, so the counterplaintiff seeks $12,000 in legal fees, or compensatory damages if legal fees are not accepted by this Court.
2. Order the Defendant to issue a public apology, to be approved by the Court, and published in a reputable news outlet to mitigate the reputational harm caused by the Defendant’s meritless and baseless claims.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 26th day of February 2025.