Lawsuit: Adjourned Pepecuu v. VortexX_X [2025] DCR 8

[Pepecuu]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRCT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Pepecuu
Plaintiff

v.

VortexX_X
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On the 20th of January 2025, at approximately 15:30 UTC, while traveling from the spawn area to CBD039 (a shop rented by the user Mikeoxlonger1), the plaintiff was abruptly attacked by the defendant, who was armed with a shotgun. This unprovoked attack resulted in the immediate death of the plaintiff.

Following this initial incident, the defendant continued to engage in violent actions against the plaintiff over the course of the next hour. Despite multiple explicit warnings from the plaintiff to cease such behavior, the defendant persisted in inflicting harm, intentionally killing and injuring the plaintiff numerous times.

During this series of violent actions, the defendant caused significant damage to the plaintiff’s property and belongings, such as the destruction of plaintiff’s elytra and severe damage to their set of enchanted netherite armor, forcing the plaintiff to spend large sums of money in order to repair or replace the items damaged by the defendant.

Despite repeated requests from the plaintiff to halt the destructive behavior, the defendant continued their reckless and malicious actions, displaying a blatant disregard for the established laws of Redmont.

I. PARTIES
1. Pepecuu (Plaintiff)
2. VortexX_X (Defendant)

The plaintiff (Pepecuu) will be representing themselves in this case.

II. FACTS
1. On the 20th of January 2025, around 15:30 UTC, the plaintiff was suddenly attacked by the defendant with an armed weapon, causing instant death.
2. Over the next hour, the defendant continued to kill and injure the plaintiff numerous times using a weapon (P-001 to P-007), despite numerous different calls by the plaintiff to cease their violent actions (P-008 to P-011).
3. The defendant’s actions caused severe physical damage to the plaintiff’s enchanted netherite armor, as well as the destruction of the plaintiff’s enchanted elytra (Before: P-012, After: P-013).

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant’s actions caused severe physical damage and the destruction of the plaintiffs property, namely the plaintiff’s elytra and their set of enchanted netherite armor.
2. The defendant’s destructive actions are a blatant disregard of Redmont law, along with the outrageous behaviour by the defendant during the incident.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $2,000 in Compensatory Damages for the severe damage to the plaintiff’s enchanted netherite armor, directly caused by the damage stemming from the weapons used by the defendant.
2. $500 in Compensatory Damages for the destruction of the plaintiff’s enchanted elytra, directly caused by the damage stemming from the weapons used by the defendant.
3. $2,500 in Punitive Damages for the defendant's blatant disregard for Redmont law and their outrageous behavior to commit mass murder during the incident, and to deter the defendant from ever committing such horrendous acts of violence ever again.
4. Any additional relief the court may deem appropriate.

V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-002

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-003

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-004

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-005

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-006

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-007

imgur.com

Spoiler: P-008

Spoiler: P-009

Spoiler: P-010

Spoiler: P-011

Spoiler: P-012

Spoiler: P-013

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 20th day of January 2025

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@vortexx_x is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of pepecuu v. vortexx_x [2025] DCR 8

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Your Honor,

I will be representing the defendant on behalf of the Public Defender Program.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR INGAME TRIAL

The Defense formally request an In-game Trial

 

[Pepecuu]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR INGAME TRIAL

The Defense formally request an In-game Trial

The plaintiff would like to deny this request for an in-game trial, given concerns over time zone differences, which will hamper the ability of either party to attend the in-game trial during a reasonable hour of the day.

 

[ko531]

As both sides can't agree to an in game trial the request is Denied.

We will now enter Discover. Discover will last for the next 72 hours starting now.

 

[Pepecuu]

Your honour, the plaintiff would also like to request that the defendant provide proof of representation, as they have not provided one thus far.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Your honour, the plaintiff would also like to request that the defendant provide proof of representation, as they have not provided one thus far.

I am a public defender i will show records.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Here is the records

Your honour, the plaintiff would also like to request that the defendant provide proof of representation, as they have not provided one thus far.

Spoiler: Proof of Representation

.

 

[Pepecuu]

The Plaintiff submits the following:

Spoiler: P-014

Spoiler: P-015

 

[Pepecuu]

As both sides can't agree to an in game trial the request is Denied.

We will now enter Discover. Discover will last for the next 72 hours starting now.

Your Honour, the plaintiff would like to motion to end discovery early.

As attached, the defense has also verbally stated their intent to agree with this motion.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Your Honour, the plaintiff would like to motion to end discovery early.

As attached, the defense has also verbally stated their intent to agree with this motion.

View attachment 51334

I agree To the following

 

[ko531]

Alright, We will move to Answer to Complaint. Defense has 72 hours to post their Answer to Complaint.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Motion

N THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION For Summary Judgment

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges Reason 1. The defense believes this case is straight forward and there is no defence. Therefore the defence asks for summary Judgment.

​

 

[ko531]

Motion

N THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION For Summary Judgment

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges Reason 1. The defense believes this case is straight forward and there is no defence. Therefore the defence asks for summary Judgment.

​

Does the Plaintiff concur?

 

[Pepecuu]

Does the Plaintiff concur?

Your honour, the plaintiff would like to respectfully deny this motion.

 

[ko531]

Your honour, the plaintiff would like to respectfully deny this motion.

Motion for Summary Judgement Denied, The Defense still has about 65 hours to post their answer to complaint.

 

[KingBOB99878]

Your Honor,
As you may know my mother died last month of stage four lung cancer and her funeral is across country and we have to drive their. I will not have the time to work on this lawsuit so another public defender will be taking care of it

Spoiler: Proof of another Public Defender

[

/SPOILER]

 

[Babysoga4real]

Your Honor,
I will be taking over as the Public Defender in this Case.

 

[Pepecuu]

Alright, We will move to Answer to Complaint. Defense has 72 hours to post their Answer to Complaint.

Your honor, I believe the 72 hours allocated for the defendant to submit an answer to the plaintiff's complaint has elapsed.

 

[ko531]

We will be moving to opening statements. Plaintiff has 72 hours to post theirs.

 

[Pepecuu]

Opening Statement

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

Your Honor, this case is about an unprovoked and relentless act of violence that resulted in repeated harm, destruction of valuable property, and a clear disregard for the laws that govern Redmont. The Plaintiff comes before you today seeking justice for the deliberate and senseless attacks carried out by the Defendant.

On January 20th, 2025, the Plaintiff was traveling peacefully from the spawn area to CBD039, when, without warning, the Defendant launched a brutal attack using a shotgun, killing the Plaintiff instantly. But this was not just one act of aggression. For the next hour, the Defendant repeatedly hunted down and attacked the Plaintiff, despite numerous explicit pleas by the Plaintiff to stop. This was not self-defense. This was not an accident. This was a calculated, ongoing assault.

The evidence will show that the Defendant’s violent actions caused severe physical damage to the Plaintiff’s prized possessions. In fact, the Plaintiff’s enchanted elytra was completely destroyed. Additionally, the Plaintiff's enchanted netherite armor also suffered extensive damage, forcing the Plaintiff to spend significant sums of money on repairs. The evidence will also show that, despite being explicitly warned multiple times, the Defendant continued their reckless actions, blatantly disregarding Redmont law and the Plaintiff’s rights.

Your Honor, despite being given ample time to do so, the Defendant has failed to respond to these allegations, further demonstrating their disregard for responsibility and justice. But accusations alone are not enough. The evidence will speak for itself. Therefore, the Plaintiff will present clear and undeniable proof of the Defendant’s egregious actions, and at the conclusion of this trial, the Plaintiff asks that you hold the Defendant accountable and grant the relief that the Plaintiff rightfully deserves.

Thank you.

 

[ko531]

The defense now has 72 hours to post their opening statement

 

[Babysoga4real]

MOTION

THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION For Summary Judgment

The defence has nothing to argue on or disagree on, the Plaintiff has provided sufficient Evidence for a Verdict.

 

[Pepecuu]

MOTION

THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION For Summary Judgment

The defence has nothing to argue on or disagree on, the Plaintiff has provided sufficient Evidence for a Verdict.

Your Honor, the Plaintiff accepts the Defendant’s motion, seeing as the Defendant has stated that they have no arguments or disputes regarding the Plaintiff's claims. Furthermore, the Defendant have acknowledged that the Plaintiff have provided sufficient evidence for a verdict.

Since there is no genuine dispute of material fact, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant summary judgment in their favor and award the relief sought in the Plaintiff's complaint. Additionally, the Plaintiff requests any further relief that the Court deems just and proper.

 

[ko531]

Case is in recess pending a verdict

 

[ko531]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Pepecuu v. Vortexx_x [2025] DCR 8.

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The defendant had a clear disregard of the law in their multiple attempts to kill the plaintiff.
2. The defendant damaged the plaintiff's property by causing loss of durability in their armor.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The defense failed to provide any defense.

III. THE COURT OPINION
The damaging of property as alleged with the loss of durability on the Plaintiff's armor is an interesting argument but one that I can't say I come to agree with. For almost all property damage, the damage is not something that the owner means to occur. Armor on the other hand is different. Armor serves a purpose to protect the user in exchange for loss of durability. In order for armor to serve its intended purpose it must be damaged in the process. So, I cannot say the defendant is liable for property damage when that property is being used as intended by the plaintiff.

As for the Defendants outrageous disregard of law, I do agree. The defendant is seen killing the plaintiff and attempting to do so multiple other times while only being thwarted by the kill limit. Instead of stopping after being thwarted by the kill limit, the defendant continued to cause as much damage as possible. For this I find it outrageous and therefore find in favor of the plaintiff.


IV. DECISION
The District Court rules in favor of the Plaintiff with a modified prayer of relief.

The DOJ is hereby ordered to fine Vortexx_x $2,500 and unfine Pepecuu the same amount for punitive damages.


The District Court thanks all involved.