Lawsuit: Dismissed MikeOxlonger1 v. Ollie_army [2025] DCR 12

[Babysoga4real]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


MikeOxlonger1
(represented by me)
Plaintiff

v.

Ollie_army
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant has not returned a Drill owned by the Defendant and also hasnt payed rent as agreed.


I. PARTIES
1. MikeOxlonger1
2.Ollie_army

II. FACTS
1. Both Parties signed a Legally Binding Contract.
2. The Defendant whilst farming in the Wild lost the Drill given via the Plaintiff.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiffs Property was lost and as Stated in Evidence the Defence has to be returned.
2. The Defendant didn't want to return it over anything in a equal value such as Rented Plots, Cash or other Assests

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 15,000$
2. The Plaintiff wishes for 480$ per day until a Verdict or a Drill or Assets of equal Value are given(The Plaintiff may decide Value on Assets if offered) to the Plaintiff.
3. The Plaintiff wishes for 7,500$ of Emotional Damage as the Drill was a Part of his Buisness which he cares a lot about and works every day on.

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This (2) day of (Febuary) (2025)

 

[Babysoga4real]

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Writ of Summons

Ollie_army is required to appear before the District Court in the case of MikeOxlonger1 v. Ollie_army [2025] DCR 11

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Writ of Summons

Ollie_army is required to appear before the District Court in the case of MikeOxlonger1 v. Ollie_army [2025] DCR 11

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Your Honor,
We request that a PD be called.

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Ollie_army is hereby held in contempt of court. The DHS is to punish them as appropriate.

 

[Babysoga4real]

Ollie_army is hereby held in contempt of court. The DHS is to punish them as appropriate.

Your Honor,
The Plaintiff wishes a Verdict in the Form of Summary Judgment. Or has the PD system been called?

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Your Honor,
The Plaintiff wishes a Verdict in the Form of Summary Judgment. The PD System couldnt provide a PD.

I don't recall that the PD System has been contacted yet.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Your honor, I have been assigned to this case as a Public Defender.

I will be filing a motion shortly.

Thank you

Proof of representation attached.

Spoiler

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Court Rules and Procedures 5.12

Under Rule 5.12 (Lack of Personal Jurisdiction) 'the plaintiff fails to have sufficient standing in order to pursue the case.'

The plaintiff MikeOxlonger1 a.k.a LiveLaughToaster, has since been permanently deported since this case was filled. They no longer have standing within this court as they cannot participate in Redmont activities.

We can see this line specifically in this [Appeal Request 2023 SCR 2]

The idea that deported players have no rights within Redmont is a long upheld decision within the courts. In Ligthiago v. FuriousPaladin [2023 FCR 79] we see that the Judge had been informed of a deported players lack of right to representation.

We also see this in the appeal REALTV4968 v. Staff Team where a deported player attempts to represent themselves and is disallowed from doing so by staff, and is also reiterated here in gsse v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024 FCR 101] by Judge Duke that deported players have no rights.

Most recently this supreme court decision upholds previous determinations that "Deported players have no rights in our nation", UnityMaster v. lcn [2025 SCR 2]

This recent case that was dismissed about the first listed plaintiff, and stands here. MikeOxlonger1 v. Philip_d_blank [2025 DCR 9]

 

[Babysoga4real]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Court Rules and Procedures 5.12

Under Rule 5.12 (Lack of Personal Jurisdiction) 'the plaintiff fails to have sufficient standing in order to pursue the case.'

The plaintiff MikeOxlonger1 a.k.a LiveLaughToaster, has since been permanently deported since this case was filled. They no longer have standing within this court as they cannot participate in Redmont activities.

We can see this line specifically in this [Appeal Request 2023 SCR 2]

The idea that deported players have no rights within Redmont is a long upheld decision within the courts. In Ligthiago v. FuriousPaladin [2023 FCR 79] we see that the Judge had been informed of a deported players lack of right to representation.

We also see this in the appeal REALTV4968 v. Staff Team where a deported player attempts to represent themselves and is disallowed from doing so by staff, and is also reiterated here in gsse v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024 FCR 101] by Judge Duke that deported players have no rights.

Most recently this supreme court decision upholds previous determinations that "Deported players have no rights in our nation", UnityMaster v. lcn [2025 SCR 2]

This recent case that was dismissed about the first listed plaintiff, and stands here. MikeOxlonger1 v. Philip_d_blank [2025 DCR 9]

Your Honor,
May we Respon?

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

You may respond.

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Plaintiff, do you have a response?

 

[Babysoga4real]

Plaintiff, do you have a response?

Your Honor,
We fully understand this Motion this Cases has lost its standing.

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

This case is hereby dismissed. Plaintiff, in the future please take factors like what was mentioned in the Motion to Dismiss into consideration.