After a 2-0 vote the Supreme Court has voted to accept the appeal and reverse the original verdict. The plaintiff may refile the case in the Supreme Court. The original verdict will not be enforced pending the outcome of the retrial.
The appeal is denied due to the plaintiff failing to demonstrate solid harm resulted from the President's actions. The original verdict found no proof of financial loss or any constitutional violations. This appeal presents no new facts to justify a reconsideration.
The Supreme Court declines to hear this case. Given other errors in the federal case, not getting emotional damages is harmless. We see no need to do anything with the Judge's decision.
In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal for the following reason.
We have found no merit to overturn the decision made by Justice Matthew, the verdict correctly held that the defendant did not have enough legal capacity due to their playtime and lack of financial...
The decision is final and the EI will remain. Please make the arguments for STV or the Presidential Run-off acts as part of the actual case. The Court has recognized that there is a valid path to the run-off in both laws. Another motion to reconsider for either party on the EI will result in a...
Clarification: I’m sustaining that my comment related to the Presidential Run-Off Act is being stricken from the record. The Emergency Injunction continues into effect.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.