Recent content by Taelor

The courts have received your appeal request. Due to both of our current Justices (Sumo & Relaxed) having been involved in the original case, neither are able to work on this appeal. This case is in recess pending the appointment of another Justice.

The courts have received your appeal request. Due to both of our current Justices (Sumo & Relaxed) having been involved in the original case, neither are able to work on this appeal. This case is in recess pending the appointment of another Justice.

As court clerk, I'm just bumping this thread so it doesn't get burried.

Due to there being 2 cases numbered 31, this case number will be changed to FCR 35. Apologies for the confusion.

For the proportional representation sheet thing it takes a lot of manual entry and there was a wrong entry that was just overlooked so the proportionality distribution was off because of it. It was my fault for overlooking it. People want you to get done fast so you rush and then errors happen...

Present

Just a friendly reminder from the court clerk, please follow the template for posts, including naming the post. The clerk will rename the post with the case number when it gets assigned. Thank you!

Feliz dia de los muertos!

Happy Halloween!

I agree with the defendant your honor.

Let me rephrase: The plaintiff is dropping this case.

Your honor, the plaintiff is requesting to drop this case as we have reached a settlement out of court.

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS The Plaintiff oppose to the motion to dismiss on the grounds of: 1. The Plaintiff was in "detainment" in the prison bus, for an undisclosed amount of time. There was no cell sign that said how long she would be there, she couldn't move around or mine. And...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Taelor Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On October 18, 2023, I set a bounty on a player who had been asking to go to jail as they were...

Notice: This case will be given a new case number ([2023] FCR 66) as it was given the same case number as Mask3D_WOLF v. The Commonwealth of Redmont FCR 64.