Upon reconsideration, I will grant an extension to post your opening statement. I do expect that if you need another extension you will ask before the deadline is up, though.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Creepy505 v. d3froggy [2023] DCR 15
I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff participated in an auction made by the Defendant for a plot of land.
2. The Plaintiff won the auction and the Defendant failed to respond regarding the transferring...
The case will not be dismissed, however we will move on without the Plaintiff's opening statements. The Defense may now present their opening arguments.
The Defense's objection is sustained and I will not allow the witnesses to testify in this format. It is contrary to the procedures of the Courts to allow witnesses to DM lawyers with their answers to questions. Furthermore, after consulting with staff, I have confirmed that permanently deported...
This appeal is ridiculous. I'm going to break it down by each claim you've made.
You yourself made a statement acknowledging that everything you said was true, and you would be held responsible for lies as perjury. Giving "incorrect" information in a lawsuit is not even what you did. You...
No, you do not need to respond. The motion to reconsider is denied. The Save The Public Defender Program Act specifies that the Judicial arm of the government shall maintain a Public Defender program to provide the assistance of legal counsel. I believe that the Defendant needs a Public...
Given these real-life circumstances, I understand that it is impossible for the Defendant to appear in court, and thus I am requesting a public defender to advocate for the Defendant. The public defender may respond with the standard Answer to Complaint, Motion to Dismiss, or both.
If it would please the Court, I request to present a short statement as a party mentioned in the case, in order to provide the Court with the context and rationale behind my decision.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@Dusty_3, @TheDonuticus, @Nacho, @HugeBob, and @AlexTheLion are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of xLayzur & Krix v. Politico as witnesses.
Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at...
Dartanman is hereby held in contempt of court. You may not speak out of turn in court cases you have not been summoned to. I order that they be punished by the DOJ as appropriate, and their out-of-line comment will be struck.
I will allow the amicus brief, but I am instructing you to keep it...
Thank you for the ping, counselor, but I have not forgotten about this case.
I have been considering both sides' arguments as to the legitimacy of witnesses. I have reached a decision, as follows. Players with low activity, or "dead" players, may still be sued. This has been set as precedent...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.