ko531
Citizen
Magistrate
Education Department
Supporter
3rd Anniversary
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
Legal Eagle
ko531
Magistrate
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2022
- Messages
- 1,581
- Thread Author
- #1
Username: ko531
I am representing a client
Who is your Client?: The Commonwealth of Redmont
What Case are you Appealing?: [2024] FCR 116
Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Alexanderlove [2024] FCR 116
Basis for Appeal: The Commonwealth wishes for the verdict to be vacated as it is not in compliance with the law. We do not wish for a retrial however as that would violate a citizens rights. We are only asking for a Vacated verdict so a new verdict may be given more in line with the law and one that does not set Dangerous Precedent.
Duke claimed that Ghost writing isnt Legal fraud when stating:
"If Mr. Love were to “ghostwrite,” he would not be breaking the law as he is not practicing in a court of law"
This is very much wrong. The act of ghost writing is about lying to the reader on who wrote the information so If alexanderlove were to ghost write then the court would be actively lied to as to who is actually behind the case. It would have the exact same effect as if Alexanderlove went under a new name to practice law.
This decision sets dangerous and harmful precedent for the legal community. What is the point of disbarring someone when they can easily avoid it by ghost writting? What is the point of passing the legal exams if you can just ghost write? Legal fraud is now almost useless against the very thing it was trying to stop.
As for Conflict of Interest Duke stated:
"However, it does not constitute a COI when clients agree to waive their right to representation if a higher-status client is involved."
This is just wrong. The definition for Conflict of Interest (in a legal sense) is:
"In the legal context, a conflict of interest is defined as the situation where the same legal counsel represents both the defense and the plaintiff simultaneously in the same case."
Dragon law with this policy to allow one client to sue another would be a conflict of interest as Dragon law is still actively representing both clients in almost all legal matters. They have attorney client privillege for both clients so to allow these lawsuits could give dragon law an advantage as they have access to very private information about the exact entity they are suing. Dragon law has the responsiblility to do what is best for their clients which does not include suing them for a higher pay day.
As you can see these 3 charges all being found not guilty does so much more harm then good. It sets terrible precedent and will utterly render these laws useless. This is why the Commonwealth is appealing for a vacated verdict in order to prevent the legal field from going to chaos. This is not just about finding one person guilty, its about upholding integrity and accountability in the practice of law.
Supporting Evidence:
I am representing a client
Who is your Client?: The Commonwealth of Redmont
What Case are you Appealing?: [2024] FCR 116
Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Alexanderlove [2024] FCR 116
Basis for Appeal: The Commonwealth wishes for the verdict to be vacated as it is not in compliance with the law. We do not wish for a retrial however as that would violate a citizens rights. We are only asking for a Vacated verdict so a new verdict may be given more in line with the law and one that does not set Dangerous Precedent.
Duke claimed that Ghost writing isnt Legal fraud when stating:
"If Mr. Love were to “ghostwrite,” he would not be breaking the law as he is not practicing in a court of law"
This is very much wrong. The act of ghost writing is about lying to the reader on who wrote the information so If alexanderlove were to ghost write then the court would be actively lied to as to who is actually behind the case. It would have the exact same effect as if Alexanderlove went under a new name to practice law.
This decision sets dangerous and harmful precedent for the legal community. What is the point of disbarring someone when they can easily avoid it by ghost writting? What is the point of passing the legal exams if you can just ghost write? Legal fraud is now almost useless against the very thing it was trying to stop.
As for Conflict of Interest Duke stated:
"However, it does not constitute a COI when clients agree to waive their right to representation if a higher-status client is involved."
This is just wrong. The definition for Conflict of Interest (in a legal sense) is:
"In the legal context, a conflict of interest is defined as the situation where the same legal counsel represents both the defense and the plaintiff simultaneously in the same case."
Dragon law with this policy to allow one client to sue another would be a conflict of interest as Dragon law is still actively representing both clients in almost all legal matters. They have attorney client privillege for both clients so to allow these lawsuits could give dragon law an advantage as they have access to very private information about the exact entity they are suing. Dragon law has the responsiblility to do what is best for their clients which does not include suing them for a higher pay day.
As you can see these 3 charges all being found not guilty does so much more harm then good. It sets terrible precedent and will utterly render these laws useless. This is why the Commonwealth is appealing for a vacated verdict in order to prevent the legal field from going to chaos. This is not just about finding one person guilty, its about upholding integrity and accountability in the practice of law.
Supporting Evidence: