Lawsuit: Dismissed BaconDonut Enterprises v. BoiBot’s Skins [2020] DCR 14

[Maxterpiece]

IN THE COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT
CIVIL ACTION

BaconDonut Enterprises
Plaintiff

v.


BoiBot’s Skins
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The defendant made an add that violates rules and laws code: 15.16 aka Slander.

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I. PARTIES
1. Maxterpiece (president and co-owner of BaconDonut Enterprises
2. Pig_Girl2003 (Vice President and co-owner of BaconDonut Enterprises
3. BoiBotPlayz (owner of BoiBot’s Skins)

II. FACTS
1. An ad was posted in the Democracycraft discord server for the defendant (Evidence).
2. In it, it states “You may know of Skin Palace. Their prices are ridiculous”
3. This violates rule and law 15.16 Slander (Slander bill)
4. Skin Palace is a subsidiary of BaconDonut Enterprises
...

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The claims for relief are explained above
...

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. All I want is the ad not to be posted (and never posted again), and $300.00 compensation, for loss of our sales
...

thank you for reading

 

[Nacho]

Verdict

Case No. 27 -12-2020

I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. Plaintiff ( BaconDonut Enterprises ) claims that the defendant ( BoiBot’s Skins) released an Ad slandering a subsidiary of BaconDonut Enterprises.


III. THE COURT OPINION
1. The Plaintiff fails to provide any evidence proving that the defendant actually stated the mentioned ad.
2. The Court of DemocracyCraft will not make not allow cases to be filed under hearsay.


IV. DECISION
The Court hereby dismisses the case on the failure to provide substantial evidence of the encounter.

 

[Maxterpiece]

Your honor, if you click the word “evidence” it is a link to the screenshot